WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Lt. Melvill: Well done, Sir! Did you see that Noggs? Deceived him with the up and took him with the down. Norris-Newman: Well well, this one's a grandfather at least. If he'd been a Zulu in his prime I'd have given odds against your lancer, Mr.Melvill.
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  GalleryGallery  PublicationsPublications  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
» Private 547 F (S). Skinner 1st Batt. 24th Foot.
Today at 3:21 am by General Greene

» Son of 2-24/1240 CSgt William Wilson Allen VC (or Allan)
Yesterday at 6:48 pm by Kenny

» Put a name to these chaps.
Yesterday at 5:23 pm by Gardner1879

» A new memorial for the Gardners
Fri Jul 20, 2018 3:59 pm by Gardner1879

» John Dunn By Susan Nind-Barrett
Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:49 am by xhosa2000

» The Marini Henry Carbine
Thu Jul 19, 2018 4:23 pm by timothylrose

» FIND-A-GRAVE WEBSITE
Thu Jul 19, 2018 3:25 pm by barry

» A Soldier Artist In Zululand
Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:47 pm by lionshead

» Martini Henry - Correct and real period butt stock markings?
Thu Jul 19, 2018 10:27 am by SRB1965

» What to do with your research when you have passed away.
Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:44 am by grahame_k

» Which Mkii or mkiii
Wed Jul 18, 2018 10:41 pm by SRB1965

» LEGACY: Heroes of Rorke's Drift' by Kris Wheatley
Tue Jul 17, 2018 1:13 pm by louisafilby

» Medal auction
Mon Jul 16, 2018 10:23 am by Gardner1879

» Regimental Paylists
Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:37 pm by Bill8183

» Bassage Diary
Sat Jul 14, 2018 3:34 am by 90th

Lt. (Brevet Major) J.R.M. Chard, 5th Field Company, Royal Engineers--Rorke's Drift and Ulundi
(Mac and Shad) Isandula Collection)
Rededication Rorke's Drift Defender William Wilcox. 8th May 2011 Dolton Devon.
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Top posters
90th
 
littlehand
 
Frank Allewell
 
ADMIN
 
1879graves
 
rusteze
 
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
 
John
 
Mr M. Cooper
 
impi
 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Top posting users this month
Frank Allewell
 
rusteze
 
SRB1965
 
Kenny
 
90th
 
Gardner1879
 
xhosa2000
 
John Young
 
ADMIN
 
Julian Whybra
 
Most active topics
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Durnford was he capable.5
Durnford was he capable. 4
Durnford was he capable.1
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable.2
Durnford was he capable. 3
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.

Share | 
 

 The Tents Were Struck.

Go down 
AuthorMessage
old historian2

avatar

Posts : 1096
Join date : 2009-01-14
Location : East London

PostSubject: The Tents Were Struck.   Sun Feb 07, 2010 12:10 am

What doe's is mean to strike the tents. At Isandlwana there was a fuss because the tents had not been struck, At Kambul the tents were struck. But why was this done just before battle commenced, surly this would have be time consuming, not the kind of thing,one would want to be doing when you have thousands of zulu's bearing down on you. No doub't this was army regulations but I can't work out the reason for doing this. The tents would have been more usefull left in place and erected, as this would have been a good defence against zulu snipers. Of cause I could be completey wrong and there was a good reason behind it.
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9622
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: tents were struck.   Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:53 am

hi oh2.
To strike the tents is to pull them down or pull out the centre pole to collapse them. The tents need to be struck so
you have a clean field of fire , and also anyone looking from a distance seeing the tents struck would know a battle
was iminent . One of the reasons for the massacre at Isandlwana was the tents not being struck, if Milne had seen
they were struck , C"ford would have known earlier that the camp was under threat of iminent attack. Also when the
troops attempted to withdraw back onto the camp , they did not see the zulus coming from behind the camp because
of no clear field of sight . As for the zulu snipers I dont see it as a major threat , due to their lack of expertise in using
the older weapons. Also they didnt have much idea on sighting their weapons. so, summing up , the tents needed to
struck and it wouldnt take long just pulling down the centre pole , At Khambula WOOD had plenty of time , as his scouts
had seen the zulu coming from a long way off. I may be wrong but from memory he had at least a couple of hours to organise
his defence which was already done , as they were well encamped on the hill for sometime previously.
cheers 90th.
Back to top Go down
Chelmsfordthescapegoat

avatar

Posts : 2557
Join date : 2009-04-24

PostSubject: Re: The Tents Were Struck.   Sun Feb 07, 2010 11:53 am

Good answer 90th. But was there not a threat of entanglement. In the event of a retreat being made by the British.
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9622
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: the tents were struck.   Sun Feb 07, 2010 10:53 pm

hi ctsg.
I dont think a retreat was in the minds of the british officers during the zulu war . Their main worry
was , as they thought " To get the zulus to attack in great numbers " . So they would have a quick
decisive victory with the use of their firearms and artillery etc , etc. I am positive 100 % that entanglement
wouldnt have been seen as an obsticle .
cheers 90th.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: The Tents Were Struck.   

Back to top Go down
 
The Tents Were Struck.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: