WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Zulu Dawn:Corporal Storey : [to the soldier next to him, referring to the ammunition] Soft 'eaded buggers these. Flatten out against the bone. Smash 'em out. Storey's mate: But bullets run out... and those bloody spears don 't.
 
HomeHome  GalleryGallery  PublicationsPublications  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
» Best Zulu War Books
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyYesterday at 11:08 pm by 90th

» knobkerrie brought back by a soldier of the 91st Highland Regiment
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyThu Mar 26, 2020 12:13 pm by 90th

» Just a quick hello to you all
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyThu Mar 26, 2020 6:36 am by beeza

» Royal Small Arms Factory Sparkbrook Birmingham
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyWed Mar 25, 2020 2:39 pm by FROGSMILE

» Vusamazulu Credo Mutwa
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyWed Mar 25, 2020 9:21 am by Frank Allewell

» Levy Leader Mr A. Smerdon
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Mar 24, 2020 7:03 pm by 1879graves

» Captain HUGH O'DONNELL.
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Mar 23, 2020 7:01 pm by 1879graves

» The end of TMFHT
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Mar 23, 2020 9:58 am by Julian Whybra

» By reporting an abuse relating to “Sexual and/or pornographic content” you will get my attention.
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyThu Mar 19, 2020 5:12 pm by beeza

» Closure of the National Army Museum, Chelsea
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyThu Mar 19, 2020 10:06 am by John Young

» Pte. William JENKINS, KIA Isandlwana
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Mar 08, 2020 9:19 pm by Tim Needham

» Zulu assegai or not
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Mar 08, 2020 4:28 pm by Magnus

» Zulu War kit bags
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Mar 08, 2020 3:46 pm by Magnus

» Colonel J.H, Spurgin 21st Fusiliers
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Mar 08, 2020 11:20 am by 1879graves

» Lt William, Edward Day SPRING 1/24th
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySat Mar 07, 2020 7:59 pm by 1879graves

Surgeon-General SIR CHARLES MacDONAGH CUFFE, K.C.B., LL.D
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Cuffe-Surgeon-181x240Isandula Collection)
Black as Hell, Thick as Grass
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Top posters
90th
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Frank Allewell
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
littlehand
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
ADMIN
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
1879graves
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
rusteze
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
John
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Mr M. Cooper
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
impi
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Top posting users this month
90th
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Frank Allewell
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Julian Whybra
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Magnus
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Peter35
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
ymob
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
1879graves
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Lunger
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Neil Aspinshaw
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
John Young
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_leftARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. BarARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Bar_right 
Most active topics
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Durnford was he capable.1
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Durnford was he capable. 4
Durnford was he capable.5
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable.2
Durnford was he capable. 3
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.

 

 ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Dave

Dave

Posts : 1605
Join date : 2009-09-21

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Jul 29, 2012 10:56 am

HANSARD 1803–2005 → 1870s → 1871 → April 1871 → 28 April 1871 → Commons Sitting
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.


http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1871/apr/28/motion-for-a-select-committee
Back to top Go down
barry

barry

Posts : 918
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Algoa Bay

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: The Martini-Henry   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Jul 29, 2012 2:04 pm

Hi Dave,

Thanks, a good one.
So,....... the mighty MH,..... an unreliable dinosaur at birth?

regards,

barry
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand

Posts : 7086
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 51
Location : Down South.

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptySun Jul 29, 2012 5:21 pm

Thanks Dave. It certainly looks like that Barry. Salute
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Jul 30, 2012 9:42 am

Dave and all

Surfing the net for titbits will barely scratch the surface, indeed The Hansard reports are the tip of the iceberg. If you think they had trouble accepting the M-H, you should see the issues they had with the Lee Metford, oh, and didn't that design basis last for another eighty years?, with the same two piece stocking this report so desperately tried to belittle?. It's called "the shock of the new",

If you think the MP's were worried, you should see the amount of fear in the military, most of which had knew nothing but the Enfield Rifle, they disliked initially the Snider, the Martini was beyond their imagination. This report was reviewing the trials of 1869-70, there was another THREE years of variations before it was adopted, interestingly They replaced Dixon: the superintendent of the Royal Small Arms factory in 1871.





you won't find on the net:

Proceeds of the committee assembled at the War Office 20th March 1871

The report of Brig Gen John Adye Director of Artillery 13th march 1872

Papers prepared for the Consideration of the Conference & war department 19th Dec 1874



FWIW, before everyone accuses me of being MH biased, was it the best rifle?, no it wasn't, but it was as good as the technology of 1870 could produce, and the rifle finally approved in Oct 1873 was wholly different to the trial this report alluded to, different calibre, different action, stronger lever, improved sighting, better breech block, improved knocks form and breeching, improved method of block attachment and a stronger firing pin.
What was overlooked was the extractor, which a decade later was to prove near fatal....but thats for another time.


If you ever get the chance to handle and evaluate the actions of the Soper, the Albini Breandalin, the Joslyn, the Improved Snider and the other trials rifles the best in gun designers and technology could offer in the last years of the 1860's at the national Firearms centre in Leeds History, you'll see what I mean. Two rifles I have not mentioned, one which never made the trial was the Carter and Edwards, then there was Burtons Bolt action rifle, both could have been upgraded to magazine action, something not lost on Paul Mauser, who's Pattern 71 is a mirror of the Burton of six years before! and became the Pattern 71/84 with the tubular magazine, a missed opportunity..you bet.

The research for my book had opened up far too many cans' of worms than Hansard ever will, but thats for another time. A footnote to all this, James Parish Lee offered his rifle mechanism in mid 1873, it was not until fifteen years later that it became arguably the best military bolt action rifle of the last century and a quarter.





Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
littlehand

littlehand

Posts : 7086
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 51
Location : Down South.

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Jul 30, 2012 8:25 pm

Neill, I don't think we are saying the rifle was completely useless. But the ammuntion was, especially when in battle conditions.
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224

Posts : 2102
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 53
Location : North London

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Jul 30, 2012 10:18 pm

Has there ever been a firearm that has found immediate acceptance?
Having only fired SA80s on ranges over the years - OK, had the very rare opportunity to fire a GPMG a few times - I have seen the SA80 grow from being a, shall we say, not very well liked weapon, I think it used to be referred to affectionately as the "civil servant", to the highly thought of and slick piece of kit that it is today.
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyMon Jul 30, 2012 11:22 pm

Littlehand.

But cherry picking a bit of info, which in reality was part of the evaluation of the system, three years before its adoption is part of the process of any firearm, (or a tasker rightly says, any other weapon system before and after the Martini,) It is not relevant to the discussion re-ammuntion issues eight years later so thats why I try and correct some of issues raised in postings and put it in the right context.

why is this not really relevant? because the ammunition in this report is NOT the adopted ammunition, it was Long Chamber .450", it was replaced in 1871 by the Mk1 short chamber, and subsequently by the MkIII, so it has little or no relevance to the Anglo Zulu wars discussion.

report that is not named is based upon the following official report which can be found in the condensed form

"Abstract of Reports on the Experimental Martini Henry Arms Issued for Trial in 1869," HMSO 1870, Capt and Lt-Col H C Fletcher presiding.

Worth noting that by December 1874 23,000,000 cartridges had been made, and manufacture by 1877 was 500,000 per week at Woolwich, indeed, some of these will jam, add in third party elements, sand, verdigris and damage and cartridges jam, whatever the rifle. But as I emphasise, until 1885, official reports acting upon verbal or written evidence from officers in the field are hard to find.... believe me I have been looking for them, but I am a bit bored at seeing it keep being dragged out of the cupboard every five minutes with the same argument. The facts are, there are little to back it positively.




Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
old historian2

old historian2

Posts : 1096
Join date : 2009-01-14
Location : East London

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 12:53 am

Did the MH rifles in the Zulu war, have the spiral spring & falling block as part of the mechanism, because there were some concerns shown in the report above. With regards to the ammuntion, was it the same type as used in the Sudan reports.
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 7:31 am

OH2, in basic design feature yes, however, The block of 1871, was renowned for weak springs and broken firing pins, the main criticism in the 1870 report.

All service Martinis had the pattern '74 block, which remained constant for the next 30 years into the .303" age. designed in 1873 (the 1874 production year), new block face, spring and strengthened striker. Marked "S.B" on the axis when a P71 block had been converted, otherwise block is marked '74.

Yes the MkIII boxer ammo remained the constant ammuntion, into the Sudan and beyond, The causes of jamming here was compounded by two outside and three completely avoidable errors. It's in the Official report of 1886, but I am holding this close to my chest for the book, its a revelation! and quite damning to the army of the time . Only one possibly two of the same conditions would have been met in the AZW, both with easy resolutions.
Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
barry

barry

Posts : 918
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Algoa Bay

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: The developement of the Martini-Henry   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 8:46 am



Hi Neil,
Thanks for all those bits of information about the developement of this weapon. Make no mistake very few weapons end their days as originally designed . It is just a pity that this one was a let down at a crtical time. I can identify with your relationship with it as I have a similar respect for an 1868 Army and Navy 12gg db shotgun which is still in use today, with light loadings. This is the best bird gun I ever used.
When do you plan on publishing?

Now for some technical questions:
1) the WO introduced a leather handguard. What was the motivation for this and where/when was it used?
2) the Colonials introduced a mod which entailed releaving the the breach.Do you know about this and what motivated that?
3) Is there on record that the MH ever printed sub-calibre?. If so what where the details, ie range, powder/ head masses and type.
4) What were the mean deviations around the MPI for this weapon in the hands of the average trooper? Was MOA ever possible, if so what were the deatils.

regards

barry
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224

Posts : 2102
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 53
Location : North London

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 10:16 am

" its a revelation! and quite damning to the army of the time"............some things still haven't changed!

I am not exactly into guns, not my field, but Neil makes it very interesting. Keep us up to date with the progress of the book, Neil.
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 10:47 am

Barry

quick answers as I am at work at the moment.

1) Leather shieild trailled in 1873, and appears in minute No5 report 23rd Sept 1873, and various patterns were tested, however no "official pattern" existed until 1883
2) I have seen colonial mods, with a section taken away of the receiver, a local attempt to give a side feed rather than a top feed of the cartridge. It does appear to have been tested with the Enfield spool loader of 1888.
3) Apart from .303" no other, military calibre. the .402" was extensively trialled between 1881-1887, and resulted in the failed Enfield Martini project. Various Commerically made Martinis in No2 Musket, and 11.4mm (Mauser), sherwood and rook I have seen plus many others. The most common sub calibre is the "Morris Tube' in .297/.230" sub calibre,(accepted 14th Feb 1884 & used in large numbers, but this was a sub calibre tube designed to retrofit into the .450 (and later.303) rifles.

4) the main issue was the suspected undersighting at ranges of 500 & 700 yards, it was tested and reported in 16th April 1875 by Frederick Close of the RSAF. I cover it in the book, but in a nutshell it wasn't undersighted, it was the firer dropping the muzzle.

I do have the comparison charts for POI, velocity and trajectory information (from the original table), I even know the name of the chronograph used to test velocity, I'll be including this in the detailed info section of the book.


Expect it to be by end of year.
Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
90th

90th

Posts : 10039
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 63
Location : Melbourne, Australia

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Army - Martini Henry Rifle    ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 12:37 pm

Hi Neil .
Excellent stuff as usual and best of British with the book . I'm sure it will be much sought after . Shocked
Cheers 90th. :lol:
Back to top Go down
barry

barry

Posts : 918
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Algoa Bay

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: The Martini -Henry   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 12:47 pm

Hi Neil,
Thanks for reply. I see from the reply that my question 3 was not understood, my apologies. In laymans terms what I meant to ask was . Could this weapon ever shoot accurately enough for the bullets to punch out intersecting concentric circles on the target. This would appear to the oberver, at a distance, to be one hole for a number of shots. Here in SA the slang for this sought after phenomenon in shooting precision , in the vernacular is "slang oe", ie snakes eyes, in English. Thus two intersecting holes for two shots.

regards

barry
Back to top Go down
old historian2

old historian2

Posts : 1096
Join date : 2009-01-14
Location : East London

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 1:56 pm

Of course there is a big difference in testing these rifles in conditioned settings, than in combat.
Back to top Go down
John

John

Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 57
Location : UK

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 2:36 pm

"It does appear that the cartridges were assembled by the orphaned children of British Soldiers they were relatively cheap to produce. They were found to be vulnerable to being easily damaged, and produced inferior muzzle
velocities."

Wasn't exactly skilled labour.
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 5:30 pm

Barry

I"ve done it, and done many overlapping holes. I fire without rests, just prone or free standing, Original mean average was expected to be approx 2.3" fired from a fixed rest at 100 yards., unless it was a rifle which attained to only 2nd class, in which case the mean average was tested in a mechanical rest and fired at 500 yards and that was < 36" at that range.

https://i.servimg.com/u/f41/14/61/42/17/result10.jpg note the three in the 6/7 overlapping.

This shows mean accuracy, One of my Martinis, 100 yards, shot off-hand, it's slightly over sighted, at 100 by approx 5" as the results show, this is a PL7 target, ring spacings are 25mm.

John
Children were indeed employed at Woolwich, but most production was mechanised, as I mentioned output was 500,000 per week. cost per Million in 1873 was £3695.
Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
Chard1879

Chard1879

Posts : 1261
Join date : 2010-04-12

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 7:27 pm

Here's another house of commons debate. A bit near the Zulu War1879

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1876/feb/22/question-observations#S3V0227P0_18760222_HOL_5
Back to top Go down
impi

impi

Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 40

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 10:51 pm

There's seems to be a lot of discreadit before and after the Zulu War of the MH rifle. Wonder why that is... scratch
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyTue Jul 31, 2012 11:35 pm

The only report from the AZW was from Thesiger report number 7669/4248 and Buller, I have copies of both, neither will be found by surfing the net. Neither mention jamming, Buller mentions cartridge malformation in his. This info is public domain, why is this scratch not mentioned.

There is no doubt the tendency to jam in certain circumstances, as steps were taken place to resolve it, likewise there was totally avoidable reasons to a) prevent it b) resolve it. However as I mention many times, historically there is scant information, apart from verbal reports, to back it up until the desert campaigns.

"What I wanted to get was a report about the Jamming made by captain Crabbe, so far as I can trace this department has never had any such sent to it. Your report from the Cape (the only one I can trace) does not allude to jamming.

It is perhaps not much of a moment now, but I wish to place on record that we were not aware of any general complaints on jamming. I may mention that no such, complaints were made by Sir D Lysons committee".


H J Alderson Director of Artillery to the Deputy Adjutant General (Redvers Buller). 11th March 1886.
part of a thick plot methinks:

So draw your conclusions, but ensure the complete facts are to hand, the Jamming chapter in my book is at present 8970 words. for and against. The bibliography will list the source information not web snippets.
Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
Dave

Dave

Posts : 1605
Join date : 2009-09-21

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyWed Aug 01, 2012 7:06 am

With refrence to the ammmuntion. I know this has been posted before. Woods would have seen this first hand.

"Colonel Redvers Buller VC wrote a memo after the Zulu War in which he was heavily critical of the Boxer cartridge compared with the Snider; “My men carried their service ammunition in bandolier belts. This did very well for the Sniders, but the Martini-Henry ammunition is more delicate. It becomes unserviceable far more rapidly than the Snider -
i.   By becoming bent in the front of the swell.
ii.  By getting bruised more easily.
iii. The bullet is far more apt to drop out.
iv. It is far more liable to get damp.

This I consider very important.
I found that Snider cartridges hardly ever became unserviceable from this cause, but a good shower of rain would spoil at least one-third of the ammunition (Martini-Henry) exposed to it. I could not account for this to my satisfaction, though I made many experiments. The result was always the same; Snider remained good, Martini-Henry carried in the same bandolier became damp.” 
Maj. Gen. Newdigate also wrote to the War Office, "Numerous complaints were made about the ball-bags; the weight of the cartridges makes the bags open, and when the men double the cartridges fall out". 
Back to top Go down
Neil Aspinshaw

Neil Aspinshaw

Posts : 552
Join date : 2009-10-14
Location : Loughborough

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyWed Aug 01, 2012 9:02 am

Dave

One of my original posting I believe, this Is Bullers report I mentioned in previous post. He doesn't as Brigadier General Alderson rightly points out mention jamming here, neither does Thesiger, both were on the terra firma of Zululand, both senior officers.

There in is the basis of my initial argument, which various contributors are not grasping, its easy to find snippets of the jamming issues on the web, and what previous authors have alluded to, but in most cases the posters have not got the context of the wider implications to the quotes or statements that are being posted. but factually, apart from Hooks comments in the Royal Magazine of 1905, there is scant primary sources to the AZW that proport to Jamming, there were newspaper correspondents on the ground, who like Burleigh, ( with the Camel Corps) would be quick to latch onto anything like this, it sells papers.

As I wrote, and I am not going to contribute anything else on this topic as its being a bit done to death, there was a problem with jamming boxer cartridges, believe me I have got a file an inch thick on it for and against. To give you an idea, my study on the subject is nearly half the TOTAL words in the osprey book due out shortly, it's partly to do with the rifle, partly to do with the cartridge, ALOT to do with climatic and geographical influence, and some completely avoidable cock ups in the armouries, most of which come together in the Sudan in a big way.

Zululand is not the Sudan, its's not ether the steaming sub tropics of the Malay peninsula, (Perak), and this is why It's important to look at the context what is being posted, and what relevance it has to the AZW, before its posted. In respect to the weapon system, is it sensation or just the evolution nearly every rifle as gone through from the MH to the M16 or SA80.

Littlehand jokingly said I should be a politician..........







Back to top Go down
http://www.martinihenry.org
Dave

Dave

Posts : 1605
Join date : 2009-09-21

ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. EmptyWed Aug 01, 2012 9:06 am

Quote :
Quote :
As I wrote, and I am not going to contribute anything else on this topic as its being a bit done to death

Littlehand jokingly said I should be a politician..........
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty
PostSubject: Re: ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.   ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE. Empty

Back to top Go down
 
ARMY—MARTINI-HENRY RIFLE.
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: BRITISH / COLONIAL UNIFORMS. WEAPONS.-
Jump to: