WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Film Zulu Quote: Lieutenant John Chard The army doesn't like more than one disaster in a day. Bromhead Looks bad in the newspapers and upsets civilians at their breakfast
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  GalleryGallery  PublicationsPublications  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
Captain David Moriarity, 80th, KIA Ntombe
This photograph taken when he was in the 7th Regiment prior to his transfer to the 80th. [Mac & Shad] (Isandula Collection)
The Battle of Isandlwana: One of The Worst Defeats of The British Empire - Military History
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Top posters
90th
 
littlehand
 
Frank Allewell
 
ADMIN
 
rusteze
 
1879graves
 
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
 
John
 
Mr M. Cooper
 
impi
 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Top posting users this month
rusteze
 
John Young
 
Frank Allewell
 
SRB1965
 
90th
 
ymob
 
Julian Whybra
 
aussie inkosi
 
ArendH
 
1879graves
 
Most active topics
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Durnford was he capable.1
Durnford was he capable.5
Durnford was he capable. 4
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable. 3
Durnford was he capable.2
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.

Share | 
 

 They were really at Isandhlwana ?

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:17 am

Hi all

The Zulu regiments Mbubi, amaShutu and amaKwenke ,were really at Isandhlwana ?

I'm reluctant to include these regiments within any formal list without the reinforce-ment of any firm primary (Zulu ) or secondary sources .

The only writer worth including here is A.W.Lee ,sometime Bishop of Zululand , who in his book published in 1949 ( Lee ,op.cit.,p.74.)recounted his experiences and meeting with various Zulus including Mehlokazulu in the early years of the twentieth century and it ought be remembered that bishop Lee lived and worked among the zulus , and wrote , albeit thirty years later ,from the vantage point of first - hand meetings with warriors who participed in the events of 1879.

There is another author who mentions these three regiments as being present at Isandhlwana ?


Cheers

Pascal The Rascal
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9877
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: They were really at Isandlwana    Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:48 am

Hi Rascal .
Mbubi ( iMbube ) if they are the same unit they formed part of the right horn at Isandlwana according to Ian Knight in Zulu Rising .
I've found the other two you named , but cant find if they were at Isandlwana or not . Very Happy
Cheers 90th . Salute
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:55 am

Hi Marsupial

After Lee, they were all three at Isandhlwana, and after other modern authors, none of the three were Sad Sad Sad

And why they would not have the right to be there?


Cheers

Pascal The Rascal
Back to top Go down
littlehand

avatar

Posts : 7059
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 50
Location : Down South.

PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:52 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:22 am

Little hand

Thank you, but it misses and some are not in their place .
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:58 am

My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.


Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?

                                            numbers present                                        
Left horn

Left of the left horn -ibuto uThulwane-numbers present:10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu.

Centre of the left horn-ibuto uVe -numbers present:13 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 650 men-Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana.

Centre of the left horn-ibuto umHlanga-numbers present :20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men -Source as a maximun figure based on Knight's list.                  

Right of the left horn-ibuto inGobamakhosi-numbers present :  80 amaviyo of 70 warriors= 5600 men -Source   based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu
   
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:19 am

My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.


Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?

                                                                                 
Chest

Left of the Chest-ibuto umBonambi-numbers present:30 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1500 men -Source based on the evidence of  Mehlokazulu.

Left of the Chest-ibuto amaShutu-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source as a maximun figure based on A.W.Lee.  

Left of the Chest-ibuto umXapho -numbers present:15 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 750 men-Source based on the evidence of  Mehlokazulu.

Centre of the Chest-ibuto umCijo+ibutho unQakamamatye -numbers present:70 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 3500 men-Source based on the evidence of  Mehlokazulu.

Centre of the Chest-ibuto uMtulisazwi -numbers present:30 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1500 men-Source based on the evidence of  Mehlokazulu.





               

Right of the left horn-ibuto inGobamakhosi-numbers present :  80 amaviyo of 70 warriors= 5600 men -Source   based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:38 am

My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.


Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?

                                                                                   
Right horn

Left of the right horn
-ibuto Nokenke-numbers present:20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men -Source based on the evidence of  Mehlokazulu.

Right of the right horn
-ibuto uDududu -numbers present:20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men-Source based on the evidence of Sihlahla.

Right of the right horn
-ibuto Mbubi-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source as a maximun figure based on A.W.Lee.                  

Right of the right horn
-ibuto umKhulutshane-numbers present :2 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 100 men -As an absolute maximun.

Right of the right horn-ibuto umsikaba-numbers present :  10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -As an absolute maximun figures based on Knight's list.

Right of the right horn
-ibuto Isanqu -numbers present:6 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 300 men-Source based on the evidence of Sihlahla.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Mon Aug 05, 2013 12:00 pm

My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.


Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?

                                                                                 

The Loins

-ibuto uThulwana-numbers present:40 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 2000 men -Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana and  Mehlokazulu.

-ibuto isiBabule -numbers present:10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men-After me per deduction  Very Happy 

-ibuto Nkonkone-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -As a maximun figure based on Knight's list.

-ibuto iNdhlondhlo-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -As a maximun figure based on Finney's list.

-ibuto inDluyengwe-numbers present :20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men -As an absolute maximun figures based on  Finney's list.

-ibuto uDhloko -numbers present:30 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1500 men-Source based on the evidence of Sihlahla.

-ibuto amaKwenke -numbers present:18 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 900 men-After me per deduction Very Happy 

Obviously, these 138 amaviyo were not all to RD !
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:27 pm

No opponents? This is great Salute 
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9877
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: They were really at Isandlwana ?   Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:57 pm

Hi Rascal .
As Springbok and I have said to you over the last year or so , the information you seek more than likely doesnt , or never existed in the first place . After all , it was only a 6 month war against a perceived primitive opponent . Those involved would never have believed in their wildest dreams that this small war would have the fascination it does 134 years on !
Marsy ! No  No 
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:35 pm

Yes Marsupial but if the truth is aillor with sources that I give, I should not be far! Very Happy 
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:08 am

In fact, I wonder if the Zulus were not many more at Isandhlwana, what was said !
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ?   

Back to top Go down
 
They were really at Isandhlwana ?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: