WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Film Zulu Quote: Lieutenant John Chard The army doesn't like more than one disaster in a day. Bromhead Looks bad in the newspapers and upsets civilians at their breakfast
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  GalleryGallery  PublicationsPublications  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
Captain David Moriarity, 80th, KIA Ntombe
This photograph taken when he was in the 7th Regiment prior to his transfer to the 80th. [Mac & Shad] (Isandula Collection)
The Battle of Isandlwana: One of The Worst Defeats of The British Empire - Military History
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Top posters
90th
 
littlehand
 
Frank Allewell
 
ADMIN
 
rusteze
 
1879graves
 
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
 
John
 
Mr M. Cooper
 
impi
 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Top posting users this month
rusteze
 
John Young
 
Frank Allewell
 
SRB1965
 
90th
 
ymob
 
Julian Whybra
 
aussie inkosi
 
ArendH
 
barry
 
Most active topics
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Durnford was he capable.1
Durnford was he capable.5
Durnford was he capable. 4
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable. 3
Durnford was he capable.2
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.

Share | 
 

  Why attacking in the third column in priority ?

Go down 
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:28 pm

Hi all

But do, Why attacking in the third column in priority?

Victory of the kind of Isandhlwana on the first or fourth column would have the same effect, right?

Cheers

Pascal the Rascal
Back to top Go down
24th

avatar

Posts : 1843
Join date : 2009-03-25

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:01 pm

Possibly because the commander of the British forces was with the third column.
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:51 pm

From memory 24th is correct , Ceteswayo had an idea or was informed that Chelmesford and his staff were in the 3rd Column
and he thought it was also the most dangerous of the 5 Columns .
Cheers 90th.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:21 am

All columns were dangerous.

And given the speed or they moved, none of these columns were priority ...

Personally, I would have launched the army on the lowest of these columns ...
Back to top Go down
24th

avatar

Posts : 1843
Join date : 2009-03-25

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:10 am

Quote :
All columns were dangerous
Correct!!

We were answering the original question.?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 9:00 am

And in your opinion what column would have been easier to destroy ? For me it is the first, because if LC had not detached some of his troops of the camp of Isandhlwana,the Zulu would have been more miseries at Isandhlwana ...
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:31 am

Rascal your question initialy was why did they attack the third column , we told you why ! . He had to attack the biggest column in an attempt to make the british think twice about invading his land , by knocking over the strongest column and the staff with it , he thought
he may not have had a war to deal with . He didnt understand the mentality of Victorian England , he was alaways going to be done one way or another .
La Marsupial :p;:
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:46 am

Marsupial, I meant that attacking first column losses would have been less severe and the psychological effect identical , right ?

Pascal the Rascal :p;:
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:52 am

Rascal .
No , it wouldnt be identical , because number 1 column wasnt the largest or strongest , I told you why he attacked the number
3 column . He did so because he wanted to attack the column he thought posed the biggest problems , and number 3 was certainly
his way or so he thought of making a statement to the British .
Cheers 90th Very Happy
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:23 am

marsupial

Why the third column would have asked more problems?

The Rascal :p;:
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Wed Mar 27, 2013 6:09 pm

Hi Rascal.
Because it was the largest and strongest and had Chelmesford with it , also because it was the Column I think that was actually taking the direct route toward Ulundi. Salute
Cheers 90th
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Thu Mar 28, 2013 6:29 am

Hi Marsupial

Well, well very interesting if we knew exactly how many kms was Ulundi of each column, the first day of the offensive ...

LC was necessarily expected to arrive about a particular day in Ulundi, he had a plan of invasion necessarily well established for the first invasion...

Eg: The columns 1 and 4 should they join the 3rd column somewhere before Ulundi?

Cheers

Pascal the Rascal
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Thu Mar 28, 2013 7:59 am

Hi Rascal .
Yes , I think that was the plan that number 1 and Number 4 would meet with number 3 at a certain destination or day before the battle of Ulundi .
Cheers 90th
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:30 am

Hi Marsupial

It's weird, that there is nothing of writed on the original plan of LC for the first invasion ...I think LC had no invasion plan :p;:

Cheers

Pascal
Back to top Go down
90th

avatar

Posts : 9878
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 62
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   Thu Mar 28, 2013 8:34 am

:p;: :p;: :p;: :p;:
Marsupial . Salute
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Why attacking in the third column in priority ?   

Back to top Go down
 
Why attacking in the third column in priority ?
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: