Latest topics | » Colonialism: A Moral LegacyToday at 5:25 pm by Julian Whybra » Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics!Today at 11:37 am by lydenburg » Writing adviceTue Mar 26, 2024 2:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Private John Scott 24th Regiment a fugitive at largeWed Mar 20, 2024 12:53 pm by Dash » Sergeant W E Warren RA - VeteranTue Mar 19, 2024 9:32 pm by Matthew Turl » Your favourite line from Zulu or Zulu DawnTue Mar 19, 2024 4:52 pm by Julian Whybra » 100,000 posts!Tue Mar 19, 2024 2:20 pm by Julian Whybra » Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ?Sat Mar 16, 2024 2:34 pm by jgregory » Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:05 am by John Young » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:08 am by Julian Whybra » British rations and moraleMon Mar 11, 2024 11:05 pm by Julian Whybra » Blue Plaque to James Egan, alias Private HaganMon Mar 11, 2024 9:16 pm by ADMIN» A few questions regarding Rorke's Drift and IsandlwanaWed Mar 06, 2024 9:16 pm by Julian Whybra » William J Hoare 24th Regiment??Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:08 pm by Dash » Swinburn Carbine issue in AZWThu Feb 29, 2024 12:53 pm by Rob D » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:39 am by John Young » Philip Price Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:55 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds » August Hammar Letter Dated 6th Jan 1879Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:34 pm by Stefaan » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:57 am by Julian Whybra » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:47 am by Julian Whybra » About the second invasionTue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 pm by 90th » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young » Watford band boys killed at iSandlwanaFri Feb 16, 2024 8:26 am by Julian Whybra » Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:10 am by 90th » Death of Michael Jayson (Zulu Dawn)Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:55 pm by ADMIN» The anniversary of 22nd January in 2024Thu Feb 08, 2024 3:51 pm by luke1997 » What was the distance?Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:46 am by Stefaan » Mrs Henry HookTue Feb 06, 2024 3:14 pm by Kenny » "With 6 good riflemen"Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:30 pm by Mr M. Cooper » What was G company supposed to do?Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:31 pm by Julian Whybra » Private 1445 Charles Meates 17th Lancers and his brother William WylieFri Feb 02, 2024 10:07 pm by John Young » South Africa Medal With Clasp To Pvt J. Salter 3/60thFri Feb 02, 2024 3:12 pm by Foody » Weatherleys Border Horse FlagThu Feb 01, 2024 9:40 pm by Herbie » Edward Plantagenet Kemeys-TynteTue Jan 23, 2024 10:06 pm by Edjg |
March 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers | |
|
+8littlehand Julian Whybra forlornhope76 Frank Allewell Chelmsfordthescapegoat impi Chard1879 6pdr 12 posters | |
Author | Message |
---|
Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:14 am | |
| 90th I fully agree. The battle was planned for the 23rd, BUT, there is no doubt that there was massive activity stretching from the Quabe Valley to the Manzimyama that around 5 kilometres, and stretching as far back as from the ridge across the plateau to the Ngwebini valley, another 5 k. That's a huge amount of territory where activity was taking place. Theres very little doubt that the camp for the night of the 21st/22nd was to be the Ngwebini valley. But that changed, hence all that activity. If it wasn't an impending battle that changed it then what was it? Julian makes a valid but inconsequential point that there is sufficient testimony that the battle was not to be on the day of the dead moon and none that changes that concept. My answer to that is the recorded commentary from the Zulu side is all from lower level foot soldiers, the type that are hardly likely to be around a bunch of chiefs in a strategy meeting so of course they were surprised. The only person above that level was Mehlokazulu, but even he was just above the menial level. His rise to fame is purely because of his infamy in starting the whole war. So my view point is, yes the battle was planned for the 23rd, but the strategy was changed for a lunch time/early afternoon attack. That was triggered an hour or so early by Raw. Cheers PS looks as though I may just have a travelling companion after all. |
| | | Ulundi
Posts : 558 Join date : 2012-05-05
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:17 am | |
| I think we all know the 23rd was the day planned for the attack, so why so much movement by the Zulus on the 22nd if they wasn't going to attack. I doubt they were practicing for the event! |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10881 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 67 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: For LC , the zulu royal army attack the camp at night Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:23 am | |
| Hi Springy . There isnt much doubt in my mind that Raw certainly brought on the attack by firing into the Impi , sure as hell they weren't going to sit there and do nothing ! . . When are you and the travelling companion heading off ? , what is the companion thinking !! . LOL. 90th |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:38 am | |
| Its a so far so good situation really. We are turning it into a road trip, 4 day journey up central SA then into the Drankensburg mountains, through into Natal then down the coastal route through Transkei and the Eastern Cape, pick up a game farm and then home. Shees and all I wanted was a week in Natal ! Now its going to be a three week run. SA is like Aussie, bloody big. |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:39 am | |
| Ulundi No fight from me mate. you've got it spot on. |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:03 am | |
| Bravo impi ,tu as tout compris ,Yes the Zulu rose up and attack Raw and company when fired upon! Yes at this point the Zulu commanders lost control. And Yes it's not an easy task to stop a Zulu Impi once on the move. And yes it was the Zulu regiments that cocked it up for the commanders because they had intended on attacking on the 23rd.
This was the same thing and Kambula Ulundi with attacks that were not provided by the C-in-C Zulus ...
The umCijo and iNgobamakhosi are ungovernable, because they Were impetuous. |
| | | Ulundi
Posts : 558 Join date : 2012-05-05
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:47 am | |
| - Pascal wrote:
- This was the same thing and Kambula Ulundi with attacks that were not provided by the C-in-C Zulus ...
That's true! The Zulu Warriors seemed to have been in control of their commanders. RD is a good example, a zulu commander tried to stop it but couldn't, |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3950 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 11:59 am | |
| "How do you explain the reports coming in from 05:30 onwards regarding mass Zulu movements around the camp of Isandlwana."
A couple of people have made the above statement in various forms. It slips easily from the keyboard and needs to be examined piecemeal. I can only say that, after reviewing the accounts which led to this sort of remark, and going out on a limb, I do not believe it holds water. Where this argument has been published I've found that the quotations offered as evidence do not match the detail in the original accounts. First, the notion of 'reports coming in' tends to make it official sounding, as if they went directly to Pulleine, and the use of the plural makes it sound as if there were several of them (which therefore 'must' have been ignored). The timing of '5.30' is HIGHLY debatable. 'Mass movements' makes it sound as if what WAS seen was a whole-impi manoeuvre. 'Around the camp of Isandhlwana' gives the impression of large-scale manoeuvrings in all geographical directions from the mountain. I question this (J'accuse!). To be precise, I question the form of the wording used. It is a very important, crucial even, part of the story of Isandhlwana and cannot be allowed to go unchallenged. I would suggest merely that forum members return to the sources where and if they can (i.e. do not rely on authors' reproduction of accounts) especially regarding Colonial survivors.
Springbok makes a valid point about there being no surviving testimony from the leaders. It then becomes speculation that a decision was made to switch the attack day to the 22nd. There is no evidence to say this did happen or didn't. But surely, key to this, is the nature of the evolution of the attack itself. Trying to square accounts like the Zulu Deserter above with a deliberate decision for an attack on the 22nd becomes difficult. It would involve an additional speculation that Ntshingwayo had decided on an attack for the afternoon of the 22nd which was precipitated by Raw's discovery and the forward movement of the umCijo. The Zulu deserter's makes more sense when allied to the traditional story (which is supported by Zulu, albeit footsoldiers', accounts).
This is a very interesting area of the battle - one I'm particularly interested in - and indeed it is something I'm still working on for an eventual essay (or something longer) on the subject. The arguments for and against as posted above by members are all valid and considered but the historian in me reminds me that historical validity requires clear-cut evidence based on primary sources before black-and-white bald statements like that at the top of this posting or like the one regarding an attack scheduled for the 23rd can be taken as read.
leaders |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:22 pm | |
| hi Julian I wait with baited breath for your arguments against Barkers statement. Fully agree that its open to interpretation on a time scale and position the incidents occurred, however they did occur and the timing is debatably accurate.
Look forward to your argument.
Cheers |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:31 pm | |
| No Ulundi, the attacks on Rorcke's Drift was not uncontrolled, Dabulamanzi would not take the risk of staying there overnight to mount the attack ...
By cons, Durnford was also uncontrollable for the poor Lord Chelmsford, as the umCijo and iNgobamakhosi are ungovernable for the Zulu generals, because Durnford also was impetuous.
It was not the first time that Durnford was imprudent ...
Under the pretext that it was most senior, he wanted to do his thing, this kind of behavior was not asked him in his orders ...
It was only to pass by isandhwana to reach the poor Lord Chelmsford ...
We saw the result ... |
| | | | For Lord Chelmsford , the Zulu royal army attack the camp at night & charge into it with all numbers | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |