Latest topics | » 100,000 posts!Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN» Your favourite line from Zulu or Zulu DawnSat Mar 16, 2024 2:47 pm by jgregory » Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ?Sat Mar 16, 2024 2:34 pm by jgregory » Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:05 am by John Young » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:08 am by Julian Whybra » British rations and moraleMon Mar 11, 2024 11:05 pm by Julian Whybra » Blue Plaque to James Egan, alias Private HaganMon Mar 11, 2024 9:16 pm by ADMIN» A few questions regarding Rorke's Drift and IsandlwanaWed Mar 06, 2024 9:16 pm by Julian Whybra » William J Hoare 24th Regiment??Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:08 pm by Dash » Swinburn Carbine issue in AZWThu Feb 29, 2024 12:53 pm by Rob D » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:39 am by John Young » Philip Price Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:55 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds » August Hammar Letter Dated 6th Jan 1879Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:34 pm by Stefaan » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:57 am by Julian Whybra » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:47 am by Julian Whybra » About the second invasionTue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 pm by 90th » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young » Watford band boys killed at iSandlwanaFri Feb 16, 2024 8:26 am by Julian Whybra » Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:10 am by 90th » Death of Michael Jayson (Zulu Dawn)Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:55 pm by ADMIN» The anniversary of 22nd January in 2024Thu Feb 08, 2024 3:51 pm by luke1997 » What was the distance?Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:46 am by Stefaan » Mrs Henry HookTue Feb 06, 2024 3:14 pm by Kenny » "With 6 good riflemen"Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:30 pm by Mr M. Cooper » What was G company supposed to do?Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:31 pm by Julian Whybra » Private 1445 Charles Meates 17th Lancers and his brother William WylieFri Feb 02, 2024 10:07 pm by John Young » South Africa Medal With Clasp To Pvt J. Salter 3/60thFri Feb 02, 2024 3:12 pm by Foody » Weatherleys Border Horse FlagThu Feb 01, 2024 9:40 pm by Herbie » Edward Plantagenet Kemeys-TynteTue Jan 23, 2024 10:06 pm by Edjg » How many started?Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:10 am by Julian Whybra » Firing Line formationMon Jan 22, 2024 2:32 pm by Julian Whybra » Why did Maj. Spalding have to go ?Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:40 pm by Stefaan » Grape-shot at close range.Mon Jan 15, 2024 7:42 am by SRB1965 » Books Hlobane & KambulaTue Jan 09, 2024 10:08 am by John Young |
March 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » 100,000 posts!Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN» Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:27 pm by Rob Herrick » British rations and moraleWed Mar 06, 2024 9:24 pm by Hobbes » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:23 am by peterfarrell » About the second invasionSat Feb 17, 2024 9:53 pm by Hobbes » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Thu Feb 15, 2024 4:46 pm by Will M » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:24 am by ADMIN |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Composite coy of 2/24th theory | |
|
+3Frank Allewell ymob Drummer Boy 14 7 posters | Author | Message |
---|
Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 26
| Subject: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Nov 17, 2017 1:00 pm | |
| Hi everyone a theory i've come up with no idea if its a good one Jackson states that a composite coy of 2/24th was formed out of the men left behind in the camp and most likely commanded by Lt's Dyer and Griffith and that it would have been posted to the right of Wardell and fallen back with H coy and that this explains why Dyer a 2/24th officer was found in the H Coy square. Is it not possible though that command was given to Captain Degacher given he was a senior officer with more experience then the young Dyer and Griffith and A company was in good hands with Lt. Porteous. I came up with this as Black states he found at the H company square Wardell, Dyer and "a captain and a subaltern not recognisable."I don't see how Mostyn could get to H Coy given he was on the left so that really does just leave Degacher as the only other Captain of the 24th who could have fell with H Coy. Any thoughts would be appreciated Cheers Sam |
| | | ymob
Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Nov 17, 2017 3:49 pm | |
| Bonjour Sam, What do you search to establish? -William Degacher was killed near Dyer and Wardell? or - He was killed in the same area of Wardell and Dyer because he took command of the "Composite Coy"? It's not quite the same question Cheers. Frédéric |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:34 pm | |
| Hi Sam I understand where your heading but a point to remember is the general confusion and separation that had to have occurred within the companies as they retreated from a fairly wide defence line to an ever diminishing position. Companies would have joined together, separated and eventualled been driven in on each other. Elements breaking of as they saw a gap and possibly joining with other breakaways. An amorphous mass really, anything could have happened, and probably did. |
| | | Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 26
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:10 pm | |
| Hi Frederic Well i basically thought Degacher must be the captain identified with Wardell and Dyer given Younghusband was found elsewhere and Mostyn was on the left. Therefor i theorised he may have ended up with Wardell as he was in charge of the composite company of 2/24th men as he had more experience then Dyer and Griffith who were both young and he may have not rejoined A company yet meaning he was free to do this. When the composite company fell back they did so with H company and that is how both Dyer a 2/24th officer and Degacher could have ended up with H company men. I came up with it procrastinating in my lecture and thought i'd see what others thought As Frank says we will never know for sure if that is how he ended up there if it was him but still fun all the same. Cheers Sam |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:16 pm | |
| Hell Sam don't stop thinking, its what makes this forum interesting, different thoughts different ideas. Its entertaining. Regards |
| | | Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 26
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:00 pm | |
| Cheers Frank i'll agree with that Sam |
| | | WeekendWarrior
Posts : 268 Join date : 2017-07-21 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:58 pm | |
| A bit late, but Colonel Degacher supposedly did discover the body of his brother where the GOC's column bivouacked; on the Nek. For whatever little what's worth. |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 10:35 am | |
| Drummer Boy Degacher became acting Major, Pulleine's Field Officer, the moment Pulleine became camp commander and would have left his coy. Porteous then took command of A coy. These would have been standing orders. |
| | | SRB1965
Posts : 1198 Join date : 2017-05-13 Age : 59 Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:01 pm | |
| Hi,
Would Durnford taking command of the camp, when he rode in, have an affect on Degachers detachment or would the reported comment (my words but something like) "I'm not staying long & don't intend to interfere" made a difference?
Are there any survivors accounts of seeing Degacher anywhere during the battle? You would think he would be with or near HBP but is not mentioned (AFAIK) in the breakfast account or squabble between AWD and HBP over supporting the NNMC?
Could he be classed as Pulleine's 2IC before the arrival of AWD and possibly after his departure?
Ta
Simon |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 5:57 pm | |
| SRB Yes, he was Pulleine's 2iC before and after Durnford's departure. Since he was field officer, he would not necessarily have "been near HBP" but engaged in his duties 'in the field' during the battle. As a 1st bn officer he would certainly not have been given temporary command over a 2nd bn company (even a composite one). As well as being a lieut, Dyer was also adjutant of the 2nd bn and perfectly capable of taking a company command in action. Not only that, he had a wonderful middle name! |
| | | SRB1965
Posts : 1198 Join date : 2017-05-13 Age : 59 Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 6:58 pm | |
| Without darting for my books or Google, I don't recall Dyers middle name....however I can take a wild guess at it and that it was not 'Simon'......
I suppose he would not have been given command of the G Coy but he might have taken command of it.....who would have thought that a 'tradesman' would command at Rorke's Drift and another at Isandlwana....... |
| | | 1879graves
Posts : 3361 Join date : 2009-03-03 Location : Devon
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 7:17 pm | |
| - Julian Whybra wrote:
Not only that, he had a wonderful middle name! Julian |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 8:05 pm | |
| SRB The field officer would not have taken command of any single unit when his responsibility was for the whole line. Graves Who's a clever boy then! |
| | | SRB1965
Posts : 1198 Join date : 2017-05-13 Age : 59 Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Tue Oct 01, 2019 9:14 pm | |
| Hi
With all due respect to your knowledge.....in desperate situations, unusual things happen.......you cannot say for definite.....yes Queens Regs/SOs may say different.....but the annals of British military history throw up many situations that are not the 'done thing'.....
I realise the burden of proof is on the person arguing against the norm....but it can not be definitely said he would not take command of (or been with) a unit.....I personally feel that as an experienced officer, he could have placed himself where he felt would have been most useful - even if that was with an enlarged company in danger of being outflanked and isolated...as G Coy was.
Cheers
Simon |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: Composite coy of 2/24th theory Wed Oct 02, 2019 9:39 am | |
| Simon No-one can say anything for definite. Certainly, when the composite coy was formed the situation was not desperate (Essex "The men were laughing and chatting in the ranks..."), and the company had an experienced officer and junior subaltern available to command it - Dyer & Griffith (more than A coy had), so why on earth would Pulleine have placed Degacher with it? Why not with A coy getting by with one officer? Degacher would/could not have placed himself anywhere. Only Pulleine (or Durnford) as superior officer could have done that. The available evidence is that it was not an enlarged coy (i.e. G coy + composite coy). The only eye-witness reported seeing separate coys and counted them as such. As you say, the burden of proof rests with the proponent of the new idea but I can't find anything concrete to support DB's suggestion. |
| | | | Composite coy of 2/24th theory | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |