WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Film Zulu Dawn:[on the death of his young assistant from friendly fire]Corporal Storey: Oh no! Come all this bloody way to get shot by a bullet from Birmingham? Shoot straight you bastards!
 
HomeHome  CalendarCalendar  GalleryGallery  PublicationsPublications  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
The Prince Imperial of France--rare pose
(Isandula Collection)
The Road to Isandlwana (The Zulu Wars) | 1 of 3
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
Top posters
90th
 
littlehand
 
Frank Allewell
 
ADMIN
 
1879graves
 
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
 
John
 
Mr M. Cooper
 
rusteze
 
impi
 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Top posting users this month
SRB1965
 
90th
 
Frank Allewell
 
ADMIN
 
John Young
 
rusteze
 
xhosa2000
 
1879graves
 
Julian Whybra
 
barry
 
Most active topics
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Durnford was he capable.5
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Durnford was he capable.2
Durnford was he capable. 3
Durnford was he capable.1
Durnford was he capable. 4
The ammunition question
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.

Share | 
 

 Question about casualties in battles

Go down 
AuthorMessage
SRB1965



Posts : 371
Join date : 2017-05-13
Age : 53
Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....

PostSubject: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 4:49 am

Hi,

On the subject of Isandlwana - does anyone know of a major field battle, where the loosers suffered a casualty rate in excess of 80%

I say 80% (and its only a ball park figure) because quite a lot of NNMC and am unknown number of NNIC made it to safety.

Unfortunately armies of antiquity seemed very sketchy about numbers.

The Battle of Little Big horn, had a lesser rate because Reno's and Benteens troops were part of the same engagement. Thermopylae (the first) whilst the Spartiates and Thespians had a bit of a wigging, the Thebans escaped (or at least survived) as did the rest of the Greek army that were dismissed when the pass was compromised.

I would like to thank my son for this question, who woke me up at 02.00 to say he couldn't sleep.....thanks kid.....its amazing what you think about when trying to get back to sleep....at least the ODI is on TV but at 61/5 or 5/61 (if you're a colonial).....

Cheers

Sime
Back to top Go down
John Young

avatar

Posts : 1473
Join date : 2013-09-08
Age : 62
Location : Lower Sheering, Essex

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:08 am

Sime,

The battles/actions where the defeated suffered a high casualty rate that readily spring to my mind are:
Cannae, 216 B.C.
The Alamo, 1836.
The Retreat from Kabul, 1842.
Battle of Camarón (Camerone), 1863.
The Wilson Patrol, Matabeleland, 1893.

I put my thinking cap on and try to think of some more.

JY
Back to top Go down
Online
ymob

avatar

Posts : 2022
Join date : 2010-10-22
Location : France

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:32 am

Adoua, 1st March 1896 (70% of losses for the Italians),
Cao Bang (Coc Xa), 1950,
Dien Bien Phu 1954.

There are some battles of the WWII (Stalingrad?) in particular against the Japonese.
Back to top Go down
http://frbomy@hotmail.fr
ymob

avatar

Posts : 2022
Join date : 2010-10-22
Location : France

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:53 am

Teutobourg (9 After JC)
Back to top Go down
http://frbomy@hotmail.fr
John Young

avatar

Posts : 1473
Join date : 2013-09-08
Age : 62
Location : Lower Sheering, Essex

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 10:40 am

Azincourt, St. Crispin’s Day, 1415.

Imjin River, 1950.

Frédéric,

You beat me to it with the Teutoburger Wald & Dien Bien Phu.

I discounted Adwa, as the ratio didn’t fit Simon’s criteria.

Regards,

JY
Back to top Go down
Online
ymob

avatar

Posts : 2022
Join date : 2010-10-22
Location : France

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:15 pm

Mr Young,
I am reading an account on the battle of Imjin River: impressive...
Bien à vous.
Frédéric
Back to top Go down
http://frbomy@hotmail.fr
ymob

avatar

Posts : 2022
Join date : 2010-10-22
Location : France

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:22 pm

El Obeid 1883,
Khartoum, January 1885
Back to top Go down
http://frbomy@hotmail.fr
SRB1965



Posts : 371
Join date : 2017-05-13
Age : 53
Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:25 pm

Hi, I'm sorry didn't count the Alamo being as it was not field battle nor Camerone or Shangani or indeed Intombi because they were not major engagements.. ..heroic yes but not major unless you are in them.....did the French suffer 80% losses at Agincourt and the UN similar at Imjin? Sounds a bit high
...maybe the Glosters.....I should have made it clear that the Army should have lost and suffered 80,% casualties.....not just specific elements of the army but it was early in the morning. Gadamak was a good one though, never thought of that and Varus's walkabout.
Back to top Go down
John Young

avatar

Posts : 1473
Join date : 2013-09-08
Age : 62
Location : Lower Sheering, Essex

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 7:25 pm

Sime,

What is your definition of a casualty? In my opinion a casualty can be killed, wounded or taken prisoner.

If you have discounted the Alamo, I will throw in the Battle of San Jacinto 21st April 1836, in that way I will Remember the Alamo & also Remember Goliad, the latter I would contend fits the bill.

As to the Imjin, in my original post which for some reason didn’t stick, I actually put the Battle of Gloster Hill, Imjin River, I was being lazy when I reposted as I was busy with other ZW matters.

JY
Back to top Go down
Online
SRB1965



Posts : 371
Join date : 2017-05-13
Age : 53
Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 8:33 pm

Hi John,

Its just a bit of fun but the idea (which I did not make clear), was drawing parallels to Isandlwana, were the whole army had around 80% KIA (hence discounted sieges and smaller engagements).

At SJ I believe the Mexican suffered about 50% dead 600 odd out of 1300ish with the rest captured/wounded or disguised as corporals.

I have put the same question on different forum and they have come back with Cannae,  the Horns of Hattin amongst others - Towton being close at around 66% Lancastrians killed (but numbers involved are sketchy). I wondered about Carrahe but am not sure about the number of prisoners the Parthians took, I know there was some.

I feel the discrepancy to dead to living & escaped (at Isandlwana) is if not unique, at least very rare - almost what you would except in a siege....I spose the Zulu Beasts Head and their speed made it like that.

Please don't spend too much time on this.

Cheers

Sime
Back to top Go down
John Young

avatar

Posts : 1473
Join date : 2013-09-08
Age : 62
Location : Lower Sheering, Essex

PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:04 pm

Sime,

You can discount Carrhae, I already looked at that, having made a study of the battle after reading the excellent works of fiction of Simon Scarrow and Peter Darman. Thanks to Marco & Cato there were a number of survivors.

The Roman casualty figure are basically as follows: 20,000 killed; 10,000 captured & 10,000 escaped.

JY
Back to top Go down
Online
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Question about casualties in battles   

Back to top Go down
 
Question about casualties in battles
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: