Latest topics | » Anderson, A. 2622 2-24thYesterday at 10:28 am by Julian Whybra » Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home Yesterday at 10:22 am by Julian Whybra » Summerland, B. 1867 Private 1/24thSun Dec 08, 2024 6:11 pm by Dash » Royal Marine Light Infantry, ChathamSat Dec 07, 2024 3:55 pm by Petty Officer Tom » Private James Powell - 24th Regiment Wed Dec 04, 2024 4:00 am by 90th » George Champney Palmes - Medal at auctionTue Dec 03, 2024 5:34 pm by Dash » Samuel PoppleSun Dec 01, 2024 10:14 pm by Dash » 25B/671 Pte. J. Machin 2/24th Regiment, KIA IsandlwanaThu Nov 28, 2024 9:43 pm by Tim Needham » John Samuel Jobbins. Rorkes Drift Defender.Thu Nov 28, 2024 12:36 pm by jgregory » The Passing of Lady Ellen Baker.Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:35 pm by John Young » Dr. A. Ralph BusbySat Nov 23, 2024 9:14 am by Julian Whybra » Lieutenant M.G. Wales, 1st Natal Native ContingentSat Nov 16, 2024 12:32 pm by Matthew Turl » Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:55 pm by Julian Whybra » H.M.S. ForesterThu Nov 14, 2024 4:07 pm by johnex » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableSat Nov 09, 2024 6:38 pm by Julian Whybra » Colonel Charles Knight PearsonFri Nov 08, 2024 5:56 pm by LincolnJDH » Grave of Henry SpaldingThu Nov 07, 2024 8:10 pm by 1879graves » John West at KambulaThu Nov 07, 2024 5:25 pm by MKalny15 » Private Frederick Evans 2/24thSun Nov 03, 2024 8:12 pm by Dash » How to find medal entitlement CokerSun Nov 03, 2024 10:51 am by Kev T » Isandlwana Casualty - McCathie/McCarthySat Nov 02, 2024 1:40 pm by Julian Whybra » William Jones CommentFri Nov 01, 2024 6:07 pm by Eddie » Brother of Lt YoungFri Nov 01, 2024 5:13 pm by Eddie » Frederick Marsh - HMS TenedosFri Nov 01, 2024 9:48 am by lydenburg » Mr Spiers KIA iSandlwana ?Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:50 am by Julian Whybra » Isandhlwana unaccounted for casualtiesFri Nov 01, 2024 7:48 am by Julian Whybra » Thrupps report to Surgeon General Wolfies Thu Oct 31, 2024 12:32 pm by Julian Whybra » Absence of Vereker from Snook's BookFri Oct 25, 2024 10:59 pm by Julian Whybra » Another Actor related to the Degacher-Hitchcock familyMon Oct 21, 2024 1:07 pm by Stefaan » No. 799 George Williams and his son-in-law No. 243 Thomas NewmanSat Oct 19, 2024 12:36 pm by Dash » Alphonse de Neuville- Painting the Defence of Rorke's DriftFri Oct 18, 2024 8:34 am by Stefaan » Studies in the Zulu War volumesWed Oct 16, 2024 3:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Martini Henry carbine IC1 markingsMon Oct 14, 2024 10:48 pm by Parkerbloggs » James Conner 1879 claspMon Oct 14, 2024 7:12 pm by Kenny » 80th REG of Foot (Staffords)Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:07 pm by shadeswolf |
December 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » Summerland, B. 1867 Private 1/24thSun Dec 08, 2024 6:11 pm by Dash » George Champney Palmes - Medal at auctionTue Dec 03, 2024 5:34 pm by Dash » Anderson, A. 2622 2-24thMon Dec 02, 2024 6:01 pm by Dash » Private James Powell - 24th Regiment Fri Nov 29, 2024 10:03 pm by BritNZCan22 » 25B/671 Pte. J. Machin 2/24th Regiment, KIA IsandlwanaThu Nov 28, 2024 9:43 pm by Tim Needham » The Passing of Lady Ellen Baker.Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:35 pm by John Young » Dr. A. Ralph BusbySat Nov 16, 2024 11:36 am by Julian Whybra » Colonel Edward William Bray, 2nd/4th Regt.Wed Nov 13, 2024 8:49 pm by John Young » Samuel PoppleTue Nov 12, 2024 3:36 pm by STEPHEN JAMES |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
|
| Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. | |
|
+490th nthornton1979 Mr Greaves 24th 8 posters | Author | Message |
---|
24th
Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
| Subject: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:16 pm | |
| I have always thought of those that left Isandlwana during the fighting as cowards. But I came across this, and after giving it some serious consideration; the writer doe’s have a point. I put myself in Henderson position, and realised I would have probably done the same. I supposed it was easy for the defenders at Rorkes Drift to frown upon Henderson and his actions but then they never witness what he did at Isandlwana.
"Henderson paused and spoke to Chard, he stated that his men would no longer obey orders, and he could not convince them to stand and fight. But their desertion must be considered in the light of their previous actions at Isandlwana, where they had fought virtually from first to last before quitting the field, now they were low on ammunition. They must have thought that a fort built from biscuit boxes and mealie sacks, could do little to deter the Zulus flushed with the success of Isandlwana."
I would be interested to see what other member’s thought of those that refused or by-passed Rorkes Drift after escaping from Isandlwana. |
| | | Mr Greaves
Posts : 747 Join date : 2009-10-18
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:47 pm | |
| They all knew what to expect when they signed up. What they didn’t expect was the Zulu Victory at Isandlwana. Henderson would have done well to avoid Rorkes Drift all together; if he had he would never have gone down in the history book as a deserter. |
| | | nthornton1979
Posts : 154 Join date : 2011-01-18 Age : 45 Location : Runcorn, Cheshire, UK
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:14 am | |
| An old post I know but thought I'd come out of the shadows and add my thoughts. - Quote :
- I would be interested to see what other member’s thought of those that refused or by-passed Rorkes Drift after escaping from Isandlwana
I can't pass judgement for them not staying to defend RD, but I certainly don't hold them in disregard for their actions. What they went through and what they witnessed is unimaginable so I feel it would be wrong for me to form an opinion of them. It happened in WW1 where frontline troops retreated through their reserve lines when overwhelmed. I'm sure it's happened in many conflicts, where men have failed to stop at 'the next line of defence' after been involved in such a battle but I wouldn't label them all as deserters. I've read that Chard and Bromhead were all for making for Helpmakaar but Dalton pursuaded them to stay and defend their position at the Drift. If this is true, it does highlight the fact that brave men don't always want to stay and fight when they have other options. To the men who made it out of Isandlwana, it must've seemed impossible that so few men could stand any chance. Not that it matters but, out of curiosity, did Henderson know the number of zulus heading to RD or would he of been under the impression that 20,000 of 'em were on the way ? An interesting thread and just my two pence worth :) Neil |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10912 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: did they not have the right .............. Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:51 am | |
| Hi nThornton1979. I dont think Henderson had much of an idea of the numbers , but I'm sure he thought it was thousands !. As you say you cant blame those who fled that were lucky enough to have escaped the carnage at Isandlwana . They no doubt thought it lunacy to try and hold the Drift after what they had witnessed . . cheers 90th. |
| | | nthornton1979
Posts : 154 Join date : 2011-01-18 Age : 45 Location : Runcorn, Cheshire, UK
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:18 am | |
| Thanks 90th,
That's what I thought. So Henderson & Co may have assumed the entire Zulu Army was heading towards RD from Isandlwana. I'm suprised they stopped at all !
Neil
|
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:06 am | |
| 90th After Henderson arrived at RD didnt his troop go around the mountain to report on the advance of the Zulu's? If that was the case he would have had a pretty good idea of the threat, and its size.
Also Hendersons troop had been in action almost from the beginning in Durnfords retirement, the fight from the donga and then the flight itself. When does the phrase 'enough is enough apply'?
Regards |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10912 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: did they not have the right .............. Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:58 am | |
| Hi Springbok. I would imagine in Henderson's case , never a truer word was spoken :lol!: . cheers 90th. |
| | | tasker224
Posts : 2101 Join date : 2010-07-30 Age : 57 Location : North London
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:52 pm | |
| Back then, the escapees of iSandlwana might have been considered cowards, but of course, our attitudes today are more informed and educated these days. Today, they would be stood down immediately and sent to the rear after what they had gone through and not expected to fight, unless in a life or death last stand. They would have been a waste of space and ammunition at RD where it is documented that the small company of men "made every bullet count." Chard had obviously decided to stay and defend RD, he had the chance to abandon the post, but chose to stay. This was not a life or death fight, as iSandlwana was. There, the men had to stand and fight for their lives with little to no preparation or warning, or means of retreat. |
| | | joe
Posts : 600 Join date : 2010-01-07 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:57 pm | |
| Hi , Personally I think the fleeing of the NNC and Hendersons Horse was a blessing in disguise. thanks Joe |
| | | tasker224
Posts : 2101 Join date : 2010-07-30 Age : 57 Location : North London
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Fri Jan 28, 2011 6:55 pm | |
| I completely Joe!
They would have been a liability, a hindarnce, not a help.
|
| | | tasker224
Posts : 2101 Join date : 2010-07-30 Age : 57 Location : North London
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:41 am | |
| that was supposed to be "I completely agree, Joe! |
| | | Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:19 pm | |
| If the NNH had joined the garrison what good could they have done? They where almost out of ammo and i think i remember reading that their guns didnt fire Marti-Henry ammuntion. The fitting on their gun allowed a hunting knife to be attached but that would be much good against a fully armed Zulu warrior.
Any ideas???????????????? |
| | | | Did they not have the right to desert Rorkes Drift. | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |