WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM

Film Zulu Dawn:General Lord Chelmsford: For a savage, as for a child, chastisement is sometimes a kindness. Sir Henry Bartle Frere: Let us hope, General, that this will be the final solution to the Zulu problem.
 
HomeHome  GalleryGallery  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  
Latest topics
» 100,000 posts!
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN

» Your favourite line from Zulu or Zulu Dawn
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Mar 16, 2024 2:47 pm by jgregory

» Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ?
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Mar 16, 2024 2:34 pm by jgregory

» Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Mar 16, 2024 11:05 am by John Young

» Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Mar 15, 2024 9:08 am by Julian Whybra

» British rations and morale
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Mar 11, 2024 11:05 pm by Julian Whybra

» Blue Plaque to James Egan, alias Private Hagan
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Mar 11, 2024 9:16 pm by ADMIN

» A few questions regarding Rorke's Drift and Isandlwana
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Mar 06, 2024 9:16 pm by Julian Whybra

» William J Hoare 24th Regiment??
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Mar 03, 2024 7:08 pm by Dash

» Swinburn Carbine issue in AZW
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 29, 2024 12:53 pm by Rob D

» Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 29, 2024 8:39 am by John Young

» Philip Price
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 29, 2024 7:55 am by Julian Whybra

» Alfred Fairlie Henderson
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds

» August Hammar Letter Dated 6th Jan 1879
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 22, 2024 8:34 pm by Stefaan

» Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Feb 21, 2024 10:57 am by Julian Whybra

» Letter of officer during Zulu wars.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Feb 21, 2024 10:47 am by Julian Whybra

» About the second invasion
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 pm by 90th

» Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young

» Watford band boys killed at iSandlwana
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Feb 16, 2024 8:26 am by Julian Whybra

» Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Feb 11, 2024 3:10 am by 90th

» Death of Michael Jayson (Zulu Dawn)
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 08, 2024 9:55 pm by ADMIN

» The anniversary of 22nd January in 2024
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 08, 2024 3:51 pm by luke1997

» What was the distance?
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 08, 2024 8:46 am by Stefaan

» Mrs Henry Hook
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Feb 06, 2024 3:14 pm by Kenny

» "With 6 good riflemen"
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Feb 05, 2024 2:30 pm by Mr M. Cooper

» What was G company supposed to do?
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Feb 04, 2024 9:31 pm by Julian Whybra

» Private 1445 Charles Meates 17th Lancers and his brother William Wylie
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Feb 02, 2024 10:07 pm by John Young

» South Africa Medal With Clasp To Pvt J. Salter 3/60th
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Feb 02, 2024 3:12 pm by Foody

» Weatherleys Border Horse Flag
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 01, 2024 9:40 pm by Herbie

» Edward Plantagenet Kemeys-Tynte
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 10:06 pm by Edjg

» How many started?
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jan 23, 2024 10:10 am by Julian Whybra

» Firing Line formation
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jan 22, 2024 2:32 pm by Julian Whybra

» Why did Maj. Spalding have to go ?
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jan 17, 2024 9:40 pm by Stefaan

» Grape-shot at close range.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jan 15, 2024 7:42 am by SRB1965

» Books Hlobane & Kambula
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jan 09, 2024 10:08 am by John Young

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 
Rechercher Advanced Search
March 2024
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
CalendarCalendar
Most active topics
Durnford was he capable.1
Durnford was he capable. 4
Durnford was he capable.5
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Isandlwana, Last Stands
The ammunition question
Durnford was he capable. 3
Durnford was he capable.2
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
The missing five hours.
Most Viewed Topics
Please Do Not Post Ads on Our Forum
Google Chrome new standards imposed
Isandlwana, Last Stands
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Recent Members To The ZULU WAR 1879 Discussion & Reference Forum ( A Small Victorian War in 1879)
The missing five hours.
ISANDLWANA SURVIVIORS
The ammunition question
Lieutenant Adendorff 1-3 N.N.C.
Pte David Jenkins. 'Forgotten' Survivor of Rorke's Drift Returned to Official Records
Top posting users this month
Julian Whybra
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
Dash
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
Hobbes
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
Bill8183
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
SRB1965
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
ADMIN
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
jgregory
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
Tig Van Milcroft
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
Rob Herrick
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
90th
The ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_leftThe ammunition question - Page 12 BarThe ammunition question - Page 12 Bar_right 
New topics
» 100,000 posts!
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN

» Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Mar 15, 2024 8:27 pm by Rob Herrick

» British rations and morale
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Mar 06, 2024 9:24 pm by Hobbes

» Alfred Fairlie Henderson
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds

» Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Feb 23, 2024 2:23 am by peterfarrell

» About the second invasion
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Feb 17, 2024 9:53 pm by Hobbes

» Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young

» Letter of officer during Zulu wars.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 15, 2024 4:46 pm by Will M

» Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.
The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Feb 15, 2024 1:24 am by ADMIN

Similar topics
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying.
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address. Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.  If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.  We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes. There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site. The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum. The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. 
Fair Use Notice
Fair use notice. This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner. We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website. If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
 

 The ammunition question

Go down 
+27
6pdr
Julian Whybra
Ray63
tasker224
Ulundi
Mr M. Cooper
impi
thinredlineMOD
Chard1879
Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Drummer Boy 14
John
barry
garywilson1
90th
Neil Aspinshaw
Ken Gillings
Mr Greaves
RobOats
Dave
Frank Allewell
24th
Saul David 1879
ADMIN
old historian2
sas1
littlehand
31 posters
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 16 ... 20  Next
AuthorMessage
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 5:47 pm

Best read it again DB. This is your problem, you only read the bits you want to. Read the full accounts posted not between the lines.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 6:12 pm

LH

He says he returned to camp and found all the boxes screwed down, but he came across a box with he
distributed among his men.
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 6:17 pm

You have totally lost me. The account posted is a transcript. What you read it what he says, nothing more nothing less. If your telling me this is incorrect, please post the account you obviously have.
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224


Posts : 2101
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 57
Location : North London

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 7:20 pm

There are primary source accounts which suggest an effort was made to deliver ammunition to the firing lines and inevitably, some will have reached its destination.
There are also numerous reliable primary accounts which suggest that some troops were running short and desperately sought resupply.

Isn't this the simple truth?

No doubt however that ammo supply problems will have affected tactics, rate of fire etc and therefore was a factor (to some impossible to ascertain degree) in the defeat at iSandlwana.
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 8:22 pm

That about sums in up. It was a big battlefield, with many different stories, told through eyewitness accounts, reports obtained , and speculation.
Back to top Go down
Chelmsfordthescapegoat

Chelmsfordthescapegoat


Posts : 2593
Join date : 2009-04-24

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 9:44 pm

This is the ultimate sum- up.

"
Quote :
I have always thought that there was a very genuine problem with ammunition supply from the earliest stages of the battle. Namely, that it was not supplied forward and distributed fast enough to enable the rifle coys to maintain enough volume of effective fire to stop their positions being rushed, penetreated or outflanked by the Zulus. If they had indeed been adequately supplied to fire across their company arcs of fire, then at least two considerations emerge. Firstly, that fire was not very effective (which could have been caused by a variety of factors) and that 'arithmetic' (capable of being the subject of statistical modelling and modern 'Operational Analysis') defeated them. Secondly, it might tend to support the theory that for the greater part of the defence of the camp, the Zulus were prevented from advancing towards the front and flanks of mutually companies, but not to their wider flanks and rear - especially where Isandlwana crag provided a covered approach. A combination of both themes seems most likely. Ammunition was probably being delivered fast enough, and in adequate volumes. Perhaps, it was not being fired fast enough, or to good enough effect. Either way 'an ammmunition problem'.
I also do not subscribe to the idea that only details mentioned in primary sources actually happened. The corollary to that would be that if it was not recorded, therefore it did not happen. Hardly a basis for assessment or analysis!"

Source: MIke McCabe. ( You won't get better)
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 11:02 pm

Quote :
"I also do not subscribe to the idea that only details mentioned in primary sources actually happened. The corollary to that would be that if it was not recorded, therefore it did not happen. Hardly a basis for assessment or analysis!"

Totally agree 100% Salute
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 11:12 pm

DB. I'm struggling to see your point regarding Vauses account. It does say a Kaffir, found a box with some cartridges in and they were given out. What are you disputing.
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 11:18 pm

Ulundi. He is avoiding this because, Vause states that on arrival at the camp to his dismay, The ammuntion boxes weren't opened. This goes against his theory there wasn't a problem.
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 18, 2012 11:20 pm

It's starting to look like that is the case.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Jul 19, 2012 7:41 am

LH

My point was, the boxes were screwed down, but they got ammuntion anyway, so the boxes being screwed down
didn't matter.
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224


Posts : 2101
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 57
Location : North London

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Jul 19, 2012 5:57 pm

littlehand wrote:
Quote :
"I also do not subscribe to the idea that only details mentioned in primary sources actually happened. The corollary to that would be that if it was not recorded, therefore it did not happen. Hardly a basis for assessment or analysis!"

Totally agree 100% Salute

Yep, all very well put. Has to be about right. Salute
"Namely, that it was not supplied forward and distributed fast enough to enable the rifle coys to maintain enough volume of effective fire to stop their positions being rushed, penetreated or outflanked by the Zulus."
I have always concurred with this point.
Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Jul 19, 2012 7:31 pm

Which of course mean's there was an ammuntion problem. In one way or another.

DB just a quick one, are you convinced Essex's statement is true, and what he says happen. Or do you have any doubts that some of it is in correct.
Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Jul 19, 2012 9:11 pm

DB. It's a simple question.
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224


Posts : 2101
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 57
Location : North London

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 20, 2012 10:17 am

John wrote:
DB. It's a simple question.

I think he's (both DB14 account users) have gone to ground on this one John.
Back to top Go down
Dave

Dave


Posts : 1603
Join date : 2009-09-21

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySat Jul 21, 2012 12:02 pm

Is it know, how many men were in each company of the firing lines.
Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 1:32 am

I have based this on 1100 men with rifles at Isandlwana. I'm not sure how many rounds the Coloinal regiments carried with them ( per person)

So this calculations is only taking into account 900 British soldiers who we know we're allocated 70 rounds each.

70 x 900 = 63,000 rounds between them, without resupply.

900 men firing 6 rounds each = 5,400 per minuite.

Based on 1 man firing for 60 minuites he would require 6 x 60 =360 rounds

Based on 900 men firing for 60 minuites. 360 x 900 = 324,000 with resupply

So 324.000 take away the original 63,000 = 261,000 addional rounds would be required to keep the men supplied with ammuntion per hour.

But if we stick with the 63, 000 rounds which they had beween them at commencement of battle. And it is said approximately 3000 Zulu were killed at the battle, that leaves approximately 60,000 rounds unaccounted for. Not to mentioned those Zulus killed by artillery fire.

This is just a rough calculation as I have not included the Coloinal units.

So in a nut shell did they need a resupply. 900 seasoned men 70 rounds each. 63,000 rounds between them, 20,000 zulus.

Hope this makes sense. I have been out... Rolling Eyes





Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 2:06 am

I haven't checked.

Quote :
261,000 addional rounds would be required to keep the men supplied with ammuntion per hour.

In which case 600 rounds per ammo box. It would need 435 ammo boxes to be opened.

Either your calculations are wrong. Or the men did not go to the firing lines with the allocated 70 rounds. But there would have to be a lot if give and take. I believed the first half hour is when most of the damage was done to the Zulu.

If 900 men fired three well aimed volleys and everyone hit its mark, casuties would have been 2,700. Then take into account your artillery and Coloinal fire the number could have hit the 3,000 mark.

Leaving the 900 men with 67 rounds each. Total of 60,300 between them.

Failing to see if we have gone wrong somewhere or if something bad when wrong at Isandlwana. We need to take into account lost and damage ammuntion, misfires, jamming, ect.

No doubt someone has a better maths head than us. We will soon find out..
Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 2:18 am

Just before I go.. If based on your 900 men with 63,000 rounds between them. Let's say the battle lasted for 5 hours that equates to 12,600 rounds per hour. Anyway off to bed....
Back to top Go down
90th

90th


Posts : 10881
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 67
Location : Melbourne, Australia

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: The Ammunition Question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 8:30 am

Hi John / Impi.
Good effort by both of you attempting the maths Cartridge table but the trouble with these tables is accuracy !
Obviously it can't be worked out with accuracy because as you said John you dont know how many rounds the Colonials had on their person . Impi your time estimate is certainly incorrect , I think the majority of the imperial troops had well and truly parted this world after possibly 2 - 2 1/2 hrs , only the larger last stands were in operation after this time , and within 3 - 3 1/2 hrs I'd think all resistance had virtually ceased . scratch . That is the allure of this battle the fact being we dont know what happened to 100 % accuracy and will never know barring the invention of a time machine . Shocked Interesting perspectives all the same . Very Happy
Cheers 90th. Salute

Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 11:14 am

The Zulus were driven to ground after around 10 miniutes of opening fire, the rate of fire would there for decrease.
The men wouldn't have been firing 6 rounds a miniute, they were told only when desperatly pressed to fire at the
rate of 4 rounds a miniute. Kambula was just as fierce as Isandlwana, by the end of it the men had fired an average
of 33 rounds each. They would have been firing in controlled volleys, the Zulu sources record the devastion of British
Vollyes.
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 11:25 am

John. I believe there is something in what you say.

Although you have based you calculations on 900 we do know, you could add a few hundred more.

Now that's a lot of ammuntion use against 20,000 Zulu's.

Brickhill says.

"I could see nothing of the details of the infantry fighting because of the low lying land, but if the increasing gun roll kept up was any indication at all, the enemy's losses must have been terrible indeed. Our mounted force was now compelled to retire to the gulley. The Zulu left horn had extended two miles on the road to Mangeni Valley. They did not come on in lines, but evenly distributed. Nowhere could you catch three men well together and rarely two. In some places their front was a third of a mile in advance of their rear. This gulley the mounted forces held most tenaciously, every shot appearing to take effect, so much so that, with the havoc caused by the shell thrown in the kraal before mentioned, a thousand Zulu dead must have lain between the conical hill and the gulley. The leading Zulus finding that they were being mown down so terrible, threw themselves flat upon the ground to wait for others to come up, when up they jumped and came on again."

So can we asume that the men had a full allocation of ammuntion, to cause that much damage on the emery. "but if the increasing gun roll kept up was any indication at all," this can only be put down to control volley fire. Howmany volleys were fired we don't know. What we do know is that 70 rounds would last a seasoned soldier around 11.5 mins.

If we take your "Based on 1 man firing for 60 minuites he would require 6 x 60 =360 rounds.
Now Neill would have to jump in here, but I fairly sure if the soldier had managed to be resupplied the 360 rounds. I doubt very much in those conditions , including the climate that the Martinti Henry rifle would not have been able to cope, over heating, fowling, jamming,

Again using your calculation, if the casualty rate is correct, 3000 dead and wounded isn't that much, even taking into account the law of averages. 90% of the casualty rate would have occurred within the first half hour based on control fire. So what happen to the rest of the ammuntion.

1) Did they have thier allocation of 70 rounds in the first place.

2) We're the soldiers sent out, to show the Zulu what they we're up against, after all, they always assumed the Zulus weren't going to attack.

3) What was the casualty rate on the Britsih side when the Zulus returned fire.

4) Were the line officers, to controlling in the fire rate, did they wait until they were within 500 yards when the Martinti was at is most effective. Could they load quick enought, in Battle condition.

5) Did the line break panic witin the ranks,

6) Did they carry out a controlled withdrawn using what ammuntion they had carefully, in the hope they could get back to resupply.

But the main question has to be what did they do with ammuntion they had at commencement of battle. If they only downed 3000.


Last edited by littlehand on Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:46 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 11:30 am

Quote :
Kambula was just as fierce as Isandlwana, by the end of it the men had fired an average

Kambula was fortified, and I believe had Gatling guns. The two battle differ very much, no comparison.

Quote :
The men wouldn't have been firing 6 rounds a miniute, they were told only when desperatly pressed to fire at the
rate of 4 rounds a miniute. Kambula was just as fierce as Isandlwana, by the end of it the men had fired an average

So you don't think the men were desperate at Isandlwana.
The firing was hard and fast. Again Brickhill says.

"
Quote :
if the increasing gun roll kept up was any indication at all, the enemy's losses must have been terrible indeed
"

Increasing not decreasing.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 11:49 am

Kambula had no gatlin gun, no comparison ? The Zulus got into the laager, and had to be driven out by the bayonet.
Wood described it as " a close run thing ."
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 11:57 am

The fortification used Kambula consisted of a hexagonal laager formed with tightly locked wagons, and a separate kraal for the livestock, assembled on the southern face of the ridge. Trenches and earth parapets bordered both sections, and a stonework redoubt had been built on a climb just north of the kraal. A palisade blocked up the hundred yards between the kraal and redoubt, while four 7-pounders were situated between the redoubt and the laager to cover the northern advances. Two more guns in the redoubt covered the north-east.
Not a lot different from Blood River. They to we're laagered.

Completely different set-up to Isandlwana which was a vast in un-fortified area.

Please let's stick to the battle of Isandlwana. If you feel it's over you head now, just observe. Or answer the questions relating to the posts.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 12:05 pm

LH

What do you think of this ? This is describing Ansetys running fight, showing at the very late stages the 24th
still had ammuntion.

From umohti

"A portion of the British force passed over the Nek and took up a Position under the cover of the dongas on the right of the road and from that place kept up such a fire that no Zulu dared show his head over the Nek, from here they were dislodged by the right horn and tried to retire across the road and down the fugitives track,in overwhelming force and pushed among the dongas of the Manzimnyama, where they made their last stand, this body of soldiers fought well and whenever they faced about to retire they fired over their shoulders at us."
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 12:41 pm

Quote :
running fight

Running fight is not he same as line formation. It would be the occasional, turn around shot or over the shoulder. Try to concentrate on the Battle as a whole, and not individual pocket battles, or individual accounts, what ever was witnessed would have been for a few mins if that. The fact they they were running is a good indication that's something wasn't quite right wouldn't you say, along with the fact where he and his men were killed.

But you haven't tryed to account for the 63'000 rounds based on 900 men having a 70 round allocation. We know there was more than 900 with the Coloinal regiments. But John as based his on 900 British soldiers.
Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 1:54 pm

That's the problem LH, that much ammuntion, but very little impact, something went very wrong on that day. I,m guessing on the first couple of volleys, lthe Brit's where hoping they would give up. But as we know that wasn't the case. how seriously can we take Ian Knights video. Many are happy with the fact he busted the myth regarding the opening of a ammuntion box with the butt of a rifle. But when they showed the problems with the MH jamming after 14 shots it's frown upon. The biggest problem with all this, is that people take what they want from various sources to make their theories work. You can't do that it either happen or it didn't.
Back to top Go down
barry

barry


Posts : 947
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Algoa Bay

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 6:23 pm

Hi John.

Correct, ........ something else went very wrong that day!.
David Rattray had this to say about the accuracy of fire, the quote is verbatum from his " Guide book to the Anglo -Zulu war" (p212) ;

...modern studies suggest that relatively few soldiers , even in the best trained units , actively aim at and seek to kill the enemy in combat, most firing the weapons wildly and some not even firing at all. Certainly the ratio bewtween the number of rounds fired and the number of casualties inflicted on the enemy in the well documented combats of the last few centuries has been staggeringly low, usually at least several hundred to one.', unquote , Dr Adrian Goldsworthy, Cannae.

So , considering that and the fact that once the MH was fired in quck succession, copious quantities of blue/black smoke ( a characteristic of black powder munition propellants) from the MH muzzles obscured the target until the wind blew the discharge away ; and some weapons had a propensity to overheat ( probably as a result of malformed rolled brass cases allowing combustion blowback through the breach), and
ammunition was only trickled through to the line , but not enough to permit a ROF ( rate of fire) to suppress the onrushing enemy.
This fact can be established by working the maths backwards. If the the Zulus captured of the order of 300,000 rounds, which was the battalion reserves of 200,000 rds , plus 100,000. This only left 100,000 rds only to do battle with.
Taking the maths a step further 100,000rds /1100 riflemen means only 90.91 rds went to each man and would have permitted firing for 22,5 minutes, @ 4 rds a minute , which ROF was clearly not enough for the job.
In reply to an earlier question on this thread I can confirm that the Colonial units, ie NC, NMP etc were also issued with 70 rounds at the commencement of battle. Most of them were equipped with the Swinburn-Henry carbine.
By contrast, the ammuntion expended per man at RD was about 180 rds, yet their target was much smaller at about 4000 enemy, oppposed to 25,000 at Isandlwana. So, in short, RD had 1/6th the enemy with twice as much ammunition.


regards

barry


Last edited by barry on Sun Jul 22, 2012 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
Ray63

Ray63


Posts : 705
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 7:03 pm

Quote :
NMP etc were also issued with 70 rounds at the commencement of battle. Most of them were equipped with the Swinburn-Henry carbine

So alot more than Johns original calculation of 63,000 Rounds.
Back to top Go down
Mr Greaves

Mr Greaves


Posts : 747
Join date : 2009-10-18

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 9:21 pm

Well it appears, there was a problem with the ammuntion.

What happen to it.
Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptySun Jul 22, 2012 10:01 pm

You can always tell, when a twist in the tail arrives, it goes quite. Can anyone give a reasonable explanation to the amount of ammuntion supposedly used at Isandlwana.
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jul 23, 2012 12:10 am

Looking at Barrie's post, David Rattay says, some soldiers didn't fire. Why wouldn't they fire.
Back to top Go down
thinredlineMOD

thinredlineMOD


Posts : 57
Join date : 2012-04-12

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jul 23, 2012 1:24 am

Ulundi wrote:
Looking at Barrie's post, David Rattay says, some soldiers didn't fire. Why wouldn't they fire.
Psychological studies show that humans (just like animals) are normally reluctant to kill other members of their species, even in war, and further analysis of combat situations in various wars shows that expenditure of ammunition and firing accuracy do not correspond to the number of enemies killed. In that regard, there's numerous reports of soldiers from several wars who simply wouldn't shoot at their enemies or aim too high.
To what degree this was the case at Isandlwana can only be estimated, though, since killing inhibition can be trained away and depends also on the perceived status of the enemy.
Back to top Go down
http://thinredlinemod.blogspot.com
Chelmsfordthescapegoat

Chelmsfordthescapegoat


Posts : 2593
Join date : 2009-04-24

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jul 23, 2012 9:46 am

So the ammuntion problem at Isandlwana, as taken another turn. Has the amount of ammuntion they had between them in the first instances been discussed before, on this forum or any other. 70 rounds doesn't seem a lot but when you combine altogether that's some amount of ammo. Do we know how many men were in the various Compaines. This will allow us to work out how much fire power the individual Compaines had.
Back to top Go down
RobOats




Posts : 61
Join date : 2010-02-01
Age : 73
Location : Devon, UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jul 23, 2012 10:36 am

It's too simplistic to merely point at one aspect (ammunition supply) in analysis of a loss of this battle.

The primary fault lies with the commander, Chelmsford. On entering this campaign he should have looked at the success and failure of previous battles between the Zulu and European based forces. i.e. the Boers.

The Boers had a succession of battles with the Zulu and only once succeeded in defeating them. The primary factors involved were; European forces were always heavily outnumbered and despite superior weaponry were always defeated except at Blood River.

That was the battle that Chelmsford and his commanders should have examined in detail. This examination would have revealed that with the type of battle plan executed by Zulu forces against small mobile forces was to overpower them by shear weight of numbers and get into close hand to hand combat where their fighting techniques were superior to rifle fire.

In another thread I contrasted Blood River/Rorke's Drift with Isandlwana. What is absolutely clear is that for a small force outnumbered 20:1 and armed with rifles needs to be able channel the enemy into a confined field of fire to ensure success.

Also in that thread; at Rorke's Drift the British Force had 20 0000 round available and less than 100 round left at the end. They were attacked by a force of 5000. At the end the hit rate on the enemy was 1:20. The Zulu force casualties amounted to approximately 1000 killed and wounded. This was the success rate of fire concentrated at the enemy at distances of less the 100 meters.

What chance of success has a force spread over 5 miles of frontage at a range greater than 100 meters?

This defeat is purely about lack of tactical preparation, arrogance(fundamental problem) and deployment.
Back to top Go down
http://www.oats.org.uk/gen
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyMon Jul 23, 2012 12:55 pm

Quote :
The Zulu force casualties amounted to approximately 1000 killed

I thought the upper limited was around the 500 mark at RD.

I'm not sure we are to bothered at this stage, to who's fault it was, the question is at commencment of Battle and going by the field regulations of the day each man had 70 rounds, multiply that by 900 ( We know theres more) but they had available 63,000 rounds. So was it a matter of the ammuntion supply or was there mass panic, sights not being ajusted, rifles failing, men breaking ranks reducing numbers, did they have the allocated 70 rounds or less.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jul 24, 2012 10:53 pm

Zulus say Isandlwana was the worst battle, somewhere like 3,000 killed or wounded. There was
something like 4000, 000 rounds in the camp that day.


Last edited by Drummer Boy 14 on Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
littlehand

littlehand


Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 55
Location : Down South.

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jul 24, 2012 11:00 pm

DB. That may be true. So now account for 59,500 rounds of ammuntion.

Back to top Go down
John

John


Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 61
Location : UK

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyTue Jul 24, 2012 11:58 pm

Quote :
There was something like 4000, 000 rounds in the camp.

How-many did the Zulu's carry off.

Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 25, 2012 8:40 am

No-one knows, but i'd say as much of it as 20,000 Zulus could carry.
Back to top Go down
Ulundi

Ulundi


Posts : 558
Join date : 2012-05-05

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 25, 2012 9:25 am

17,000. 3,000 were killed or wounded.
Back to top Go down
impi

impi


Posts : 2308
Join date : 2010-07-02
Age : 44

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyWed Jul 25, 2012 10:43 pm

Was there any other complaints regarding the ammuntion boxes, after the
22nd Jan 1879.

Just out of interest, I read somewhere that an officer who escaped down "Devils Pass" wrote home to his parents, in which he describes what equipment he was carrying during his desent. Part if that being "70 Rounds" does this tell us that he did not fire a shot during the whole event.

If anyone else has heard this story, I would be interested I the officers name.
If of course its true.
Back to top Go down
tasker224

tasker224


Posts : 2101
Join date : 2010-07-30
Age : 57
Location : North London

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyThu Jul 26, 2012 9:19 pm

impi wrote:
Was there any other complaints regarding the ammuntion boxes, after the
22nd Jan 1879.

Just out of interest, I read somewhere that an officer who escaped down "Devils Pass" wrote home to his parents, in which he describes what equipment he was carrying during his desent. Part if that being "70 Rounds" does this tell us that he did not fire a shot during the whole event.

If anyone else has heard this story, I would be interested I the officers name.
If of course its true.

If this account really exists it would tell us a lot. I am still yet to be convinced that all those officers who escaped on horseback weren't cowards.
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 12:08 pm

LH

Can you show the primary source that the 24th companies fell back because they didn't have enough ammuntion and
that the supplies weren't reaching the front line while it was on action fast enough.

Impi and Tasker

The man was Captain Cecil D'Arcy, no way was he a coward, everyone was running that day,
plus he was awarded a VC later on in the War.





Cheers
Back to top Go down
garywilson1

garywilson1


Posts : 374
Join date : 2009-01-22
Age : 61
Location : Timisoara , Romania

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 1:10 pm

"Can you show the primary source that the 24th companies fell back because they didn't have enough ammuntion and
that the supplies weren't reaching the front line while it was on action fast enough"

Perhaps the people who would have been "primary sources" all got killed ?
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 2:29 pm

Garry

There is no evidence that the line ran out of ammunition.
Back to top Go down
garywilson1

garywilson1


Posts : 374
Join date : 2009-01-22
Age : 61
Location : Timisoara , Romania

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 2:37 pm

Neither are there are survivors form the firing line who have said they were well supplied with ammunition the whole time .
Back to top Go down
Drummer Boy 14

Drummer Boy 14


Posts : 2008
Join date : 2011-08-01
Age : 26

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 2:39 pm

When they retreated they were firing heavily, when they got back to camp they were firing heavily, when they
were surrounded they were still firing, at this point they ran out, no evidece they ran out before hand.

Curling had the 24th to his left and right, he makes no refrence to them running out or fire slackening.
Back to top Go down
garywilson1

garywilson1


Posts : 374
Join date : 2009-01-22
Age : 61
Location : Timisoara , Romania

The ammunition question - Page 12 Empty
PostSubject: Re: The ammunition question   The ammunition question - Page 12 EmptyFri Jul 27, 2012 2:49 pm

What exactly constitutes "firing heavily" - don't you think it is rather subjective ?

Back to top Go down
 
The ammunition question
Back to top 
Page 12 of 20Go to page : Previous  1 ... 7 ... 11, 12, 13 ... 16 ... 20  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Richard West “The most perfect weapons in the world” The Martini-Henry Rifle and the Anglo-Zulu War, 1879
» Isandlwana, Last Stands
» The ammunition question

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM  :: GENERAL DISCUSSION AREA-
Jump to: