Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM
Lord Chelmsford Said .Buller is ‘one of the finest soldiers of the century’, so modest and reticent –that it was difficult to say for what individual deed he had got the Victoria Cross as he had been doing acts worthy of it all along the line
Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Subject: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:23 am
Hello to all
A Hlobane, there were two Rocket Party :
The party of the Major Tremblett - 7 officers and men + 1 rocket trough.
And that of the Lieut.Bigge, RA. - 10 officers and men + 1 rocket trough.
1 - Knowing by whom, were served the 2 Armstrong 6 - pdrs,I'd like to know if all the servants of these two rocket troughs were men of the RA?
2 - How is it that there is to serve each of these two rocket troughs, three times more men than to serve those of the rocket battery at Isandhlwana ?...
Cheers
Pascal
John
Posts : 2558 Join date : 2009-04-06 Age : 57 Location : UK
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:25 pm
Quote :
"How is it that there is to serve each of these two rocket troughs, three times more men than to serve those of the rocket battery at Isandhlwana"
Isandwana was in the first invasion. Many mistakes were made.
Hlobane was in the second invasion. Lesson's learn't
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:23 pm
Lesson learn't's?
That means that the men of the 24 th foot were inaptent for serving rocket launchers ?
And the organization of the 4 th column was ready well before Isandhlwana ...
Cheers
Pascal
littlehand
Posts : 7086 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 51 Location : Down South.
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:34 pm
They wasn't prepaired for an attack at Isandlwana.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Fri Mar 08, 2013 7:08 am
And also at Hlobane , it's not what interests me, but the difference in the number of servantS
and their Regimental belonging...
littlehand
Posts : 7086 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 51 Location : Down South.
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:01 am
Hlobane wasn't a camp as such, they were attacked while attempting to capture cattle.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Artillerymen or infantrymen ? Fri Mar 08, 2013 8:07 am
The subject, this is :
1 - Knowing by whom, were served the 2 Armstrong 6 - pdrs,I'd like to know if all the servants of these two rocket troughs were men of the RA ?
2 - How is it that there is to serve each of these two rocket troughs, three times more men than to serve those of the rocket battery at Isandhlwana ?...
Home 
Gallery 
Search 
Register 
Log in 
