Zulu: Lieutenant John Chard:What's our strength? Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead:Seven officers including surgeon, commissaries and so on; Adendorff now I suppose; wounded and sick 36, fit for duty 97 and about 40 native levies. Not much of an army for you
Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Subject: Henry Hook Photograph Fri Nov 07, 2014 5:22 pm
Some time ago I posted a photograph I came across that was said to probably be Henry Hook. It came from a pretty convincing family tree on Ancestry. At the time the general consensus on the forum was that it was not him. Now I see that Kris Wheatley has used the photo on her site as being Hook. I feel somewhat vindicated! What do others think?