Latest topics | » Private 2073 W H Cunliffe 17th Lancers Today at 11:31 am by rai » Trumpeter Wilkins RA Trumpeter to Lord Chelmsford Yesterday at 11:35 am by rai » Bogus claims to having taken part in the defence of the mission station Rorkes Drift.  Yesterday at 11:26 am by Eddie » Lieutenant Charles Wallace Warden 57th Regiment Yesterday at 8:56 am by rai » Lieut-General Sir F. Forerstier Walker Yesterday at 8:34 am by rai » Sergeant 2062 Benjamin Jelliff 90th Regiment Rum at Kambula  Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:41 am by rai » Col. Ormelie Campbell Hannay, late Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders. Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:35 am by rai » Colonel W. H. Thompson  Mon Jun 05, 2023 9:24 am by rai » Segeant A Ware 17th Lancers Sergeant Charlie Law 90th Regiment Prince Imperial Sat Jun 03, 2023 11:23 am by rai » Lance Corporal 2200 Penton / Pentin 1st Dragoon Guards Sat Jun 03, 2023 10:38 am by rai » John Fielding Day  Thu Jun 01, 2023 2:11 pm by Julian Whybra » John Warman AHC 2336 Thu Jun 01, 2023 11:30 am by rai » Rare books to sell/swap Wed May 31, 2023 7:26 am by peter@zuluwars » Zulu Dawn - my part in making a great movie Tue May 30, 2023 10:57 am by Julian Whybra » Pope-Degacher personailty clash Mon May 29, 2023 6:51 pm by Julian Whybra » Smith, John. Private. 25B/1005, B Company RD Defender. Sun May 28, 2023 10:48 pm by Tim Needham » Rorke's Drift VC's Fri May 26, 2023 5:39 pm by Frank Allewell » Clash of Empires Exhibition - Registration Fri May 26, 2023 5:14 pm by Bill8183 » A Corporal, 1st Battalion, South Wales Borderers, circa 1882 Wed May 24, 2023 9:40 pm by Mr M. Cooper » Zulu campfires Mon May 22, 2023 10:48 pm by Eddie » Zulu Muskets  Mon May 22, 2023 10:22 pm by Eddie » Burst pipes cause damage to the Royal Welsh Museum, Brecon. Sun May 21, 2023 7:42 pm by John Young » Hired Transports of The Anglo - Zulu War 1879 Sun May 21, 2023 3:22 pm by Mr M. Cooper » VC's Rorkes Drift 1879 Sun May 21, 2023 3:21 pm by jgregory » Was it a dog at Rordke's Drift? Sun May 21, 2023 3:16 pm by jgregory » Rorkes Drift VC sold Sat May 20, 2023 10:33 am by jgregory » Not lost all ...!!! Sat May 20, 2023 2:00 am by Eddie » Brevet Major. Henry Spalding of Rorke's Drift and Information for Columns Thu May 18, 2023 10:58 am by Richard Spalding » Grahamstown Cdv ebay soldier cape corps Thu May 18, 2023 10:57 am by ciroferrara » Colonel Frederick Cardew Thu May 18, 2023 9:58 am by John Young » Surruier Captain RE? Mon May 15, 2023 12:25 pm by John Young » A Major, 2nd Battalion, Connaught Rangers circa 1890. Sun May 14, 2023 4:30 pm by John Young » Why no Zulu Ambush/Attack on moving Columns? Sun May 14, 2023 9:28 am by Julian Whybra » Drum-Major A.T. Rixon, 58th  Fri May 12, 2023 9:43 am by Catiline63 » 1309 PTE H. HERBERT, 2-24TH FOOT Fri May 12, 2023 8:48 am by rai |
Top posting users this month | |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Durnford was he capable. 4 | |
|
+18durnfordthescapegoat John littlehand Chard1879 ymob Ulundi 90th Chelmsfordthescapegoat sas1 Frank Allewell 6pdr Mr M. Cooper impi rusteze Ray63 ADMIN Julian Whybra 24th 22 posters | |
Author | Message |
---|
ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:38 pm | |
| - springbok9 wrote:
- ymob wrote:
- Sorry, but i have a problem with "you have the order to draw in the camp".
I don't understand this sentence. You can answer in english with others words. Many thanks. Frédéric I would think the order was for the defence ring to contract/ make smaller that would mean as well the guards, piquets etc.
'rapetisser' does that make sense?
Perfect!!!! Many thanks. |
|  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:53 pm | |
| Springy, I have posted (quite some time back now), about Durnford sending out scouts prior to sending out Raw, Barton, etc, however, you might have missed it.
Crealock was not liked by many, in fact he was known as 'The Wasp'.
As to the (rigged) court of enquiry, the officers that were purposely selected by LC and Crealock were.
Col Fairfax Hassard R.E. He was considered non-controversial, innocuous, and rather feeble.
Lt Col Francis Adeane Law R.A. He was not considered by LC to be gifted with an appetite for hard facts.
The third officer chosen was Lt Col Arthur Harness R.A. He was in command of N battery at iSandlwana, this caused a big controversy, because he was witness to many of Chelmsford's actions, but by being appointed to the COE, it precluded him from giving evidence.
Talk about being rigged eh? |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:02 pm | |
| Frederic, get to work! Steve[/quote] Steve, Julian is on line... I do not know if I'll keep this fabulous smile a long time... Cheers |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:08 pm | |
| Les Interested that you ascribe some of the thoughts to heresay? I thought I had got everything down to source and would be very happy to see the error of my ways. And yes I agree with comments in regard to the pleasure of discussion. Martin Its got a vague bell tinkling away, mind you that could be the Cabernet bottle telling me its that time of day ( nice little 1995 bottle it is to) Possibly you didn't, I hesitate to say it, put a source to it? Im one of those funny buggers that doesn't believe the COI was rigged, in the true sense of the word that is. I do believe that the terms of reference were so tight as to preclude a mass of evidence though. And optimist that I am Im waiting till that one special person opens that one special old trunk of Grandads tucked away in the back of the attic and tells us everything that was submitted and discarded only to be kept and put away for the future. And I live in hope that one day it will happen.
Frederic Im sure there are a couple of references about the irritability and tiredness of Chelmsford. I would need to search.
Cheers
Cheers |
|  | | rusteze

Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:11 pm | |
| Frederic
I am about to get a little exercise, otherwise I shall be sat in front of this screen all day. The sun is shining, and I will be back in an hour or so. By which time, as you say, we may find ourselves back at square one!
Steve |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:13 pm | |
| - springbok9 wrote:
- Les
Interested that you ascribe some of the thoughts to heresay? I thought I had got everything down to source and would be very happy to see the error of my ways. And yes I agree with comments in regard to the pleasure of discussion. Martin Its got a vague bell tinkling away, mind you that could be the Cabernet bottle telling me its that time of day ( nice little 1995 bottle it is to) Possibly you didn't, I hesitate to say it, put a source to it? Im one of those funny buggers that doesn't believe the COI was rigged, in the true sense of the word that is. I do believe that the terms of reference were so tight as to preclude a mass of evidence though. And optimist that I am Im waiting till that one special person opens that one special old trunk of Grandads tucked away in the back of the attic and tells us everything that was submitted and discarded only to be kept and put away for the future. And I live in hope that one day it will happen.
Frederic Im sure there are a couple of references about the irritability and tiredness of Chelmsford. I would need to search.
Cheers
Cheers Franck, no need to search. It's a fact that CHELSMFORD was "irritable" before the battle. Cheers. Frédéric |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:14 pm | |
| |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:16 pm | |
| |
|  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:23 pm | |
| LOL, you may be right Frank, I might not have put a source to it, however, if I am not mistaken, I am almost sure I read it in L&Q's Zulu Victory.
Well, if the officers chosen were purposely selected by LC and Crealock, it does look like there was some sort of underhandedness going on, and the evidence given was rather selective to say the least wasn't it? |
|  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:35 pm | |
| Steve, you say that the sun is shining Have you gone abroad to a sunny climate for a break mate, 'cos it's freezing cold, the snow has turned into ice and it's very dull and overcast up here, in fact it looks like it could snow again at anytime, brrrrrr! Turn the fire up. Enjoy your 95 Springy. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:02 pm | |
| Frederic, a trait found in all nationalities.no? but not used with ' bad intent ' in my example, A dictionary say's...num 3.
preciousadjective 1. valuable, expensive, rare, fine, choice, prized, dear, costly, high-priced, exquisite, invaluable, priceless, recherché,inestimable jewellery and precious objects belonging to her mother valuable cheap, worthless, rubbishy, trashy, a dime a dozen, nickel-and-dime (U.S. slang), paltry, two a penny (informal),valueless 2. loved, valued, favourite, prized, dear, dearest, treasured, darling, beloved, adored, cherished, fave (informal), idolized, worth your or its weight in gold her most precious possession 3. affected, artificial, fastidious, twee (Brit. informal), chichi, overrefined, overnice Actors, he decided, were all precious and neurotic. Collins Thesaurus of the English Language – Complete and Unabridged 2nd Edition. 2002 © HarperCollins Publishers 1995, 2002 |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:10 pm | |
| |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:14 pm | |
| [quote="xhosa2000"]Frederic, a trait found in all nationalities.no? but not used with ' bad intent ' in my example, A dictionary say's...num 3. Les, Sometimes, I have trouble understanding you. Thank you for this lesson in English which I have a great need, i know... Cheers. Frédéric |
|  | | rusteze

Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 4:48 pm | |
| Right, that's enough exercise for one day.
Martin
No snow at all in Hampshire, incredible sunset and crisp clear air. No need for these foreign climes.
Frank
How many bottles of Cabernet? I take it we can interpret "gold ring with interesting ruins to the inside" as runes?
Steve |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:03 pm | |
| Sorry Steve, its the Afrikaans in me coming out, and for tonight just the one bottle of Cab Sav. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:04 pm | |
| Soz Frederic, my english, aint wot it ought 2b. your's is so much better..  colloquialisms do not translate well i'm afraid.. xhosa |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:15 pm | |
| - xhosa2000 wrote:
- Soz Frederic, my english, aint wot it ought 2b.
your's is so much better.. colloquialisms do not translate well i'm afraid.. xhosa Sorry, i dont understand your point, but it's n ot important. Cheers |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:56 pm | |
| Désolé Frédéric, perdu dans la traduction Je ai peur !. je parle un mélange de goodish anglais et la rue argot. la faute est à moi entier, pas important..no. mais je ne veux pas vous ennuyer avec mes tentatives maladroites pour vous informer, comme je le dis Votre anglais est loin meilleure que la mienne. vôtre est beaucoup plus precise..no offenser mon ami. Les
sorry admin, just saying the same thing ish, in french ish.. |
|  | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat

Posts : 2594 Join date : 2009-04-24
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:15 pm | |
| From 1000 hrs onwards, with the addition of 250 more carbines and five more manoeuvre units, a winning outcome was possible, regardless of the circumstance created by operational level decision making. This then is a changed situation - none of the effects listed above are any longer inevitable. It is now possible to have a thumping good victory - a bloody repulse of the Zulu assault. But doing so would necessarily have entailed a close concentration of assets (and hence firepower), and a secure right flank and rear. All just about achieveable had it not been for the fact that the five newly arrived manoeuvre units were scattered across the countryside for an illegitimate purpose - a mad cap foray utilising a small all-native force against what might reasonably have been deduced was the main impi or some significant part thereof. Why was the second element of said foray launched (?) - because 'the enemy are retiring everywhere'. Believing like everybody else that there was a possibility of an attack on the camp, Durnford was quite content to stay 'where it was at'. But the arrival of Higginson's report changed all that and Durnford immediately went chasing after a fight in the open veldt - the hot-headed, impulsive lack of judgement that people who knew him best (like Sir T Shepstone) worried about. 'My idea is wherever Zulus appear we ought to attack.' Crackpot thinking - because, based on the charactersitics of their deployable military capability, the British were only capable of prosecuting the war on the operational offensive but tactical defensive. CMS.
PS. Springbok, did you find that text, where I used the Colenso's ? |
|  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:47 pm | |
| Quick at condemning by quoting "Wherever Zulus appear we ought to attack", but not so quick at supporting by saying his other famous quote which was, "If they are heading towards the General, we must stop them at all hazards".
So was he attacking? scouting? or was he obeying his orders by supporting his General in attempting to defend his rear? |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:50 pm | |
| CTSG It was there, right below your Wikepedia but you've edited it. |
|  | | impi

Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-02 Age : 43
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:53 pm | |
| CTSG. You really are wasting your time. You can't debate, when others only post personal observations. Martin's mind won't change, he wil always maintain the orders issued on 19th applied on the 22nd. |
|  | | impi

Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-02 Age : 43
 | |  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:59 pm | |
| impi, It's not just me who knows that the order of the 22nd ran concurrently with Durnford's previous orders, read Springboks simple explanation, re-the boss and the worker. |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:09 pm | |
| |
|  | | littlehand

Posts : 7076 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 54 Location : Down South.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:45 pm | |
| - Mr M. Cooper wrote:
- impi, It's not just me who knows that the order of the 22nd ran concurrently with Durnford's previous orders, read Springboks simple explanation, re-the boss and the worker.
Well I guess we all have opinions. Personally I feel the same debate, will continue until the ends of time. The diaster was a combination of senior officers would failed to communicate. I blame Queen Victoria.  & And then the Duke of Cambridge.  and then Cheteswayo for not agreeing to their terms.  and lastly Pete for starting this forum. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:49 pm | |
| |
|  | | rusteze

Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:51 pm | |
| Thanks for posting that CTSG, it is an interesting analysis, but you have to look carefully at what Snook is saying.
1. He says "a winning outcome was possible, regardless of the circumstances created by operational decision making". In other words, despite what Chelmsford intended, and had precipitated by splitting his force, it was just possible that the attack could have been repulsed if an approach such as that set out by Snook had been adopted. He knows this was not likely to happen because he said earlier that the mistakes made by Chelmsford early that morning had already set the inevitable defeat in motion.
2. He is careful to say that if flanks etc could be secured it was all just about achievable. I think that is a huge "if" and to be fair I think he does as well.
3. He than talks about the arrival of Higginson's report that "the enemy were retiring everywhere". And the hot headed lack of judgement displayed by Durnford in setting off in pursuit.
But is that why Durnford set off in pursuit, or was he just following Chelmsford's instructions when it came to fighting the Zulu?
In a letter to Alison from Clery on 13 April 1879 Clery says this about Chelmsford's approach:
"There were two things to my mind that greatly contributed to what has proved to be faulty in all Lord Chelmsford's plans, and these were the misleading experience he had of Kafir warfare in the Piri Bush: secondly the smallness of the force he knew the government would give him for any Zulu War................. On the 12 January, when we went to attack Sihayo, I was sending some mounted men rather widely to flank, when Crealock said to me in a remonstrating way "Do not do that as it will cause what actually happened in the last war - the enemy to take fright and bolt before we can get at them" Again the General issued an order that artillery was never to open fire until the enemy were within 600 yards for fear of frightening them and so deterring them from coming on, or making a bolt. I mention all this to show you that what was left undone was not the result of negligence so much as design. The idea was never entertained of being apprehensive that the enemy would come on and attack, but on the contrary, that he would not come on and attack, and that we should have to hunt him up."
So when Durnford hears that the enemy are retreating everywhere he adopts the exact approach favoured by Chelmsford and his staff. Go after them and make absolutely sure you bring them to battle.
What Snook is telling us is what he would have done. Which is fine. But it bares no relationship to what Chelmsford intended or the prevailing view of the abilities of the enemy.
Steve
Last edited by rusteze on Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:57 pm | |
|  .. That book in my opinion was written with a definite agenda. he was much more objective in LWOTF again only my opinion. xhosa |
|  | | rusteze

Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:12 pm | |
| Hi Les I'm not sure he had an agenda. He studied the ground so closely that it was almost inevitable that he would end up telling us (indirectly) what he would have done to bring about a different conclusion. The difference with LWOTF is that he is dealing with an historic victory by his own Regiment. You know what I mean Martin - before you tell me it wasn't. Steve |
|  | | littlehand

Posts : 7076 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 54 Location : Down South.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:17 pm | |
| - springbok9 wrote:
- impi
Yes. Cheers Springbok never asked, what was you in Hospital for. Just a routine checkup. |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:22 pm | |
| Yes i get that, i remember after reading it for the first ( and only ) time, how he banged on and on about the ground! pushing his regt to the fore at all times, fitting the roles of the other participants to minimize any short comings of the 24th! you might well be right Steve, but i remember feeling rather angry at the time..time i think to gird my loins and revisit it. |
|  | | 24th

Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:24 pm | |
| - littlehand wrote:
- springbok9 wrote:
- impi
Yes. Cheers Springbok never asked, what was you in Hospital for. Just a routine checkup. He was just getting a MOT before he hitting the Battlefield on the 22nd Jan. |
|  | | Mr M. Cooper

Posts : 2574 Join date : 2011-09-29 Location : Lancashire, England.
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:43 pm | |
| Steve, that is a very good post at 8.51pm, well done. And yes, of course I knew what you meant at 9.12pm. |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 9:59 pm | |
| - xhosa2000 wrote:
- Désolé Frédéric, perdu dans la traduction Je ai peur !. je parle un mélange de goodish anglais
et la rue argot. la faute est à moi entier, pas important..no. mais je ne veux pas vous ennuyer avec mes tentatives maladroites pour vous informer, comme je le dis Votre anglais est loin meilleure que la mienne. vôtre est beaucoup plus precise..no offenser mon ami. Les
sorry admin, just saying the same thing ish, in french ish.. Les, Thank you for your effort in French and for kind word. I thought you were ironic (IE your english is better than mine: a joke!!!) I understand now (English "slang" / "argot" in French) Amitiés Frédéric |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:08 pm | |
| [quote="Mr M. Cooper"]Steve, that is a very good post at 8.51pm, well done. Steve, Good, very good! I am off topic, but I always wait your essay on your relative, do you remember? As Mister Young with the photography of Cetewayo (your hypothesis: it is not Cetewayo ). As Brett Hendey with his essay on the trooper of the NMP who was disturbed afin his return in the camp the evening of the 22 January. Cheers. Frédéric |
|  | | rusteze

Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:29 pm | |
| Frederic/ Martin
I do not claim credit, it's all there if you look. There has been a joint effort over the last few days to try and put some fresh ideas into the mix. And perhaps we are getting somewhere. I did not think Snook would help us, but he does. I only went back to Sonia Clarke's book because Gary pointed me at it. Frank very helpfully set out for us the relevant source material. Frederic, you clarified the Clery question. So lets keep going cos others have contributions to make. Here endeth the lesson!
Frederic
You have the memory of an elephant.
Steve |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | |  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:03 pm | |
| Frank,
Your essay is very valuable for the understanfing of the order to DURNFORD the 22 January. Years after years, month after month, we see the sames mistakes about this order... I think it's useful to post your essay on the section of this forum "AZW essays" to be a reference for all the members. Encore merci pour votre article. Cheers
Frédéric
|
|  | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat

Posts : 2594 Join date : 2009-04-24
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:04 pm | |
| - rusteze wrote:
- Thanks for posting that CTSG, it is an interesting analysis, but you have to look carefully at what Snook is saying.
1. He says "a winning outcome was possible, regardless of the circumstances created by operational decision making". In other words, despite what Chelmsford intended, and had precipitated by splitting his force, it was just possible that the attack could have been repulsed if an approach such as that set out by Snook had been adopted. He knows this was not likely to happen because he said earlier that the mistakes made by Chelmsford early that morning had already set the inevitable defeat in motion.
2. He is careful to say that if flanks etc could be secured it was all just about achievable. I think that is a huge "if" and to be fair I think he does as well.
3. He than talks about the arrival of Higginson's report that "the enemy were retiring everywhere". And the hot headed lack of judgement displayed by Durnford in setting off in pursuit.
But is that why Durnford set off in pursuit, or was he just following Chelmsford's instructions when it came to fighting the Zulu?
In a letter to Alison from Clery on 13 April 1879 Clery says this about Chelmsford's approach:
"There were two things to my mind that greatly contributed to what has proved to be faulty in all Lord Chelmsford's plans, and these were the misleading experience he had of Kafir warfare in the Piri Bush: secondly the smallness of the force he knew the government would give him for any Zulu War................. On the 12 January, when we went to attack Sihayo, I was sending some mounted men rather widely to flank, when Crealock said to me in a remonstrating way "Do not do that as it will cause what actually happened in the last war - the enemy to take fright and bolt before we can get at them" Again the General issued an order that artillery was never to open fire until the enemy were within 600 yards for fear of frightening them and so deterring them from coming on, or making a bolt. I mention all this to show you that what was left undone was not the result of negligence so much as design. The idea was never entertained of being apprehensive that the enemy would come on and attack, but on the contrary, that he would not come on and attack, and that we should have to hunt him up."
So when Durnford hears that the enemy are retreating everywhere he adopts the exact approach favoured by Chelmsford and his staff. Go after them and make absolutely sure you bring them to battle.
What Snook is telling us is what he would have done. Which is fine. But it bares no relationship to what Chelmsford intended or the prevailing view of the abilities of the enemy.
Steve Steve, we have to understand, that the camp was never presumed to be under threat, from the moment they arrived at Isandlwana to the moment Lord Chelmsford left. Dartnell was under no illusion that he though he had found the main Zulu army. A messenger was dispatched to take the news back to the camp. At first Lord Chelmsford for whatever reason, refused to go to Dartnell's assisitence, but after some deliberation he change his mind. Orders were then issued to get ready for the off. Various orders were issued. Pulleine was ordered to defend the camp, and Col Durford was order to move to the camp. In my eyes the reason Durnford was order to the camp, was to fill in the gaps left by the men, who had left with Chelmsford. At that point there was nothing for Durnford to do apart from move to the camp, and have breakfast with Pulleine, and await further orders. If Lord Chelmsford had something in mind for Durnford, he would have sent orders with Gardner, when Gardner he took orders to Pulleine to pack up camp. Lord Chelmsford is accused of not scouting. While at Isandlwana, do we have anything to say the Zulus were in the valley at that time, fact is we don't know when they arrived. What we do know it's that the Zulus intended attacked the camp on the 23rd. But which time the camp would have packed up and moved on. Durford sent out scouts, who unfortunately discovered the Zulu army, and has we know open fire on them, causing them to rise up and attack. The attack was now in full swing. Even when Durnford knew the camp was under attack he chose to meet them in the open, instead of forming a defensive stand in the camp, where there was a good supply of ammunition and a hill that would form a natural rear defence. It was his action that caused the men to be scattered all over the battlefield, along with the lack of ammunition and mass panic all accumulated to the disaster. What I find most mysterious is why did Durnford take command, if he had no intention of staying, or as he says he would not interfere with Pulleine's command, well he did when he took command. He had his own independent command yet chose to take Pulleines command. Why? Martin questions, if Durnford had been in command, why did he not just take the two companies, possibly because at that point, he had chose to leave, and had handed command back to Pulliene. It was Melville who remonstrated with Durnford, reminding him of Pullienes orders to defend the camp. It was Durnfords fall back, that caused the problems ultimately the loss of the camp. Durnford's particular cocktail of vulnerabilities meant that exactly the wrong man, had arrived in exactly the wrong place, at exactly the wrong time for her Brittanic Majesty's Army. |
|  | | John

Posts : 2558 Join date : 2009-04-06 Age : 60 Location : UK
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:11 pm | |
| Martin, if as you say Durnford left the camp to protect LC rear, why did he go off in the opposite direct? |
|  | | ADMIN

Posts : 4321 Join date : 2008-11-01 Age : 64 Location : KENT
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:45 am | |
| |
|  | | Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 1:13 am | |
| Right here i go again! when i made my last comment to ctsg, it was in good faith, and in the spirit of the debate and the topic heading, now i will be the first to admit that my style of responding is not to everybodys taste!, but in my opinion ctsg's post although respectful and with good intention, contained aspects that i certainly took issue with, and hoped to develop to debate the issues in a normal straight forward manner..so when i posted what i did, the three phrases i chose was taken as something completely different than what i intended! i was in point of fact giving ctsg ' a heads up in advance ' of the area's i was concerned with! that idea was strangled at birth so to speak when the topic was shut down as it was.. i feel no sense of frustration, tomorrow as they say, is another day..if we can learn to put any differences aside i'm sure this debate can be fruitful, i will have another go later today at the post of ctsg's.. xhosa |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:27 am | |
| - 24th wrote:
- littlehand wrote:
- springbok9 wrote:
- impi
Yes. Cheers Springbok never asked, what was you in Hospital for. Just a routine checkup. He was just getting a MOT before he hitting the Battlefield on the 22nd Jan. Littlehand Just a couple of Stents. 24th You have no idea how close to the truth you are. Cheers all |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 5:40 am | |
| - rusteze wrote:
- Hi Les
I'm not sure he had an agenda. He studied the ground so closely that it was almost inevitable that he would end up telling us (indirectly) what he would have done to bring about a different conclusion. The difference with LWOTF is that he is dealing with an historic victory by his own Regiment. You know what I mean Martin - before you tell me it wasn't.
Steve Steve its impossible for any regular visitor to the battlefield, and I fortunately count myself among that group, to not spend time reflecting on what did happen. A few years back I took Snooks book with the mandatory bottle, a bag of Biltong and sat on top of Mahlabamkosi. 4 hours later I hadn't moved, bottle and bag were empty but I had visualised ever step of that battle. The book is a classic, but only for the troop movements built up. The rest is regimental pride and protection. Ive sat for many many hours and built up the battle in my minds eye. First time visitors tend to look at whats there rather than what WAS there. Once you've spent a few hours the movements of the companies, the Zulus all start to fit together, its why most authors/historians come back to the same/similar conclusions....................except idiots like me of course. And I do agree with very large swaths of the Colonels theories. Cheers |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:04 am | |
| Bonjour à tous, About the CLERY hypothesis:
In the essay by Frank, no evidence proves that the sentence " DURNFORD strengthens the camp" is inscribed in the order received by Pulleine from CLERY. Cheers. Frédéric |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:09 am | |
| - ymob wrote:
- Bonjour à tous,
About the CLERY hypothesis: In the essay by Frank, no evidence proves that the sentence "DURNFORD strengthens the camp" is inscribed in the order received by Pulleine from CLERY. Cheers.
Frédéric With the exception of the testimony of CLERY of course! Cheers |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8435 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:16 am | |
| Frederic The comment, strengthen the camp were made by Clery referring to the original instructions issued by Chelmsford. Cheers
|
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:17 am | |
| - springbok9 wrote:
The book is a classic, but only for the troop movements built up. Cheers Bonjour Frank, Valid for the downtrend of the Pope Compagny (G / 2-24th)? Cheers. Frédéric[/quote] |
|  | | ymob

Posts : 2268 Join date : 2010-10-22 Location : France
 | Subject: Re: Durnford was he capable. 4 Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:33 am | |
| - springbok9 wrote:
- Frederic
The comment, strengthen the camp were made by Clery referring to the original instructions issued by Chelmsford. Cheers
 I know that. But it seems to me that we have ONLY the testimony of CLERY: No other testimony corroborate the testimony of CLERY on THIS POINT ("strengthen the camp") , isn't it? Cheers. |
|  | | | Durnford was he capable. 4 | |
|
Similar topics |  |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |