Latest topics | » Photo Lonsdales HorseYesterday at 10:10 pm by ciroferrara » Soldier 13th regiment of foot Natal new photo Yesterday at 8:32 pm by ciroferrara » Private 1941 Samuel MacClue / McClune 1/24th RegimentMon Sep 09, 2024 1:33 pm by Dash » Lieutenant & Adjutant Spencer Frederick Chichester, 2nd 21stMon Sep 09, 2024 11:56 am by Rory Reynolds » In search of the 80th FootSun Sep 08, 2024 6:39 pm by Julian Whybra » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:43 pm by Dash » THE DISTINGUISHED CONDUCT MEDALThu Sep 05, 2024 11:16 pm by Julian Whybra » 61451 John Evans. Able Seaman.Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:15 pm by Matthew Turl » 9312 Sapper H Cuthbert 5th Field Coy REWed Sep 04, 2024 11:53 am by Julian Whybra » Who’s who in this photo?Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:44 pm by ianwood » Sir Robert William Jackson Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Memorial to WolseleySun Sep 01, 2024 8:47 pm by John Young » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaSun Sep 01, 2024 7:51 am by Julian Whybra » On this day 28th August, 1879Sun Sep 01, 2024 7:28 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Ducat - N.N.C. Help with plotting his careerThu Aug 29, 2024 6:58 pm by Rory Reynolds » Army Pay Department PersonnelSun Aug 25, 2024 11:51 pm by Julian Whybra » Baron Von SteitencronSun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am by Julian Whybra » Troop Despatch Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:15 pm by Eddie » Private 35/1430 James Priddle 1/13th RegimentSat Aug 24, 2024 8:09 am by Roobie257 » Zulu powder hornFri Aug 23, 2024 5:22 pm by Rob D » Telescope v. field glassesFri Aug 23, 2024 7:07 am by Julian Whybra » A Hungarian soldier in the Zulu War (?)Wed Aug 21, 2024 5:14 am by 90th » 90th foot sgt T. Collins 214Tue Aug 20, 2024 3:04 pm by johnman » Zulu "Corps"Tue Aug 20, 2024 11:43 am by Hobbes » amaKwenke amabuthoTue Aug 20, 2024 11:23 am by Hobbes » A story regarding Younghusband's charge. Hearsay or a possibility? Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:48 pm by Danny1960 » Hill of the Sphinx for sale open to offersSat Aug 17, 2024 6:44 pm by ciroferrara » Information help please Fri Aug 16, 2024 4:44 pm by Roobie257 » Capt. Geo. ShepstoneTue Aug 13, 2024 4:14 pm by Julian Whybra » Thomas William george 58th regiment 1880’s SATue Aug 13, 2024 12:05 pm by Alstar » Private John Scott 24th Regiment a fugitive at largeSun Aug 11, 2024 7:50 pm by Julian Whybra » Sergt. Woods N.N.C.Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:41 pm by Julian Whybra » Who led the Naval Brigade at Gingindlovu ?Thu Aug 08, 2024 9:32 pm by Herbert West » Herbert's Zulu war modelsThu Aug 08, 2024 7:06 pm by Herbert West » Studies in the Zulu War volumesWed Aug 07, 2024 2:31 pm by Julian Whybra |
September 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | | | | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Command and Control | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Command and Control Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:02 pm | |
| Something to chew over for the new year!
I have been reading Prof. Mary Beard's excellent new book on the history of ancient Rome called "SPQR". At one point she is talking about the battle of Cannae in 216 BC when Hannibal defeated the Roman army. She says:
'Hannibal's mystical battle plans, still on the syllabus of military academies, that amounted to little more than a clever version of getting around the back of an enemy - one trick ancient generals used that offered the best chance of encircling the opposition and the only reliable way of killing or capturing them in large numbers".
Ring any bells?
She goes on to say " It is hard to see how more sophisticated tactics could have been deployed in an ancient battle with more than 100,000 men on the field, how the commanders could have issued effective instructions to their armies or even how they could know what was going on."
Seems to me there are direct parallels to the Zulu attack at Isandhlwana. There could be virtually no control of events by Indunas once the attack was launched, either with their regiments or with each other - there are limits as to what you can do from a distant hill waving a stick. So we need to factor that in when analysing the sequences of attack.
Another question arises about how experienced those indunas were in controlling such a battle. We tend to accept that these men were old and tested warriors who were capable of out-thinking the opposition. But to what extent was isandhlwana a unique challenge for the Zulu commanders? When was the last time a Zulu army of somewhere between 20,000 and 30,000 men been put into the field? Had it ever been? Not against the Boer's surely, and how long since they had fought with other tribes on this scale? Had these commanders ever experienced such a thing?
Was this Hannibal's elephants simply rampaging out of control (you try calling them back!) or was it a surgical strike?
2,000 years and what had changed?
Steve |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:25 pm | |
| The same could be said for the British unless your saying total control was had by British commanders over the British and colonial troops. Me thinks the British commanders had about as much control over their men as the indunas had over theirs. |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:08 am | |
| Steve Just to be bloody difficult and start the year of well: I don't buy the conventional view of an out of control army charging across the hills. Without doubt the intervention of Raw started a series of events that had the Umcityu jump the gun and charge forward followed by probably 60 percent of the army. BUT by the time the impi reached the ridge formations were peeling of for the left and right horns and the chest was pretty much formed up. that didn't happen by any form of group osmosis. There had to have been a level of control to combine the attacks. There was very definitely an initial flat out charge and had to have settled down to a more determined half jog. SD and I think at least one other account mentions the rate of advance. We could assume that in that settling down distance over a few kilometres the various Indunas regained control, to a degree, and positioned the various elements. So with those Zulu regiments crashing down onto a pretty solid and unwavering 'thin red line', unwavering equals disciplined, how would you justify your comparison CTSG? Unless of course your referring to the control Chelmsford neglected to impose? Cheers |
| | | rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:11 am | |
| Frank/CTSG
My main point is this. By definition, it was always an out of control army. Some adjustments could be made as individual elements advanced, and one element could emulate another as it saw what they were doing. But in the sense of overall command (and in particular if any major change in tactics was required) they had no means of making it happen. For example, once the right horn was behind the mountain there was no way of them knowing what was going on out on the plain. The same must be true of other Zulu regiments at either end of the extended formations. I genuinely do not know the answer to my question about whether this set of commanders had ever had to manage anything on this scale before. I don't think they had, but I could be wrong. That is another major reason why it was all a bit gung ho.
As to the British, that is another question. They certainly had more control during the battle, and as an army they had far more means of control and communication available to them - whether they used them well (or at all) is another matter. I do have a question about the British, but I will put that on pause for a moment while we put the Zulu to rights.
Steve |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10904 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:29 am | |
| What you say certainly makes good sense to me Steve . I also doubt the Zulu commanders had ever commanded an army of that size in a battle , possibly less than half that number say at Ndondakusuka in 1856 or thereabouts ? , not sure of the spelling , and who actually commanded besides Cetswayo , Ntshingwayo and some of the older indunas at Isandlwana were most likely there , I think Ntshingwayo was on Mbuyazi's side ? 90th |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:35 am | |
| Steve I would agree that the horns were never in a position to be effectively controlled which makes my long held argument on the position of the reserve even more tenable. So from that point of view yes to a degree you had an out of control attack but 'out of control' in its broadest sense rather than a 'willy nilly'. In terms of the Zulu last mass battle, Im open to correction but I would probably put that as the battle of Ndondakusuka in 1856, round 12 or 13 regiments commanded by Cetswayo. John Dunn was involved in that one on the wrong side, going back to and earlier discussion it was his massed rifles that destroyed Cetswayos initial attack. Over 5000 dead in that battle but interestingly the horns were never out of sight as at iSandlwana so probably grist for your mill Steve.
Cheers |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:36 am | |
| Sorry Gary, posts crossed |
| | | rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:34 pm | |
| Yes, I agree, out of control in its widest sense. I think it does make your alternative view of the position of the reserve more tenable (it was, in practice, out-with the control of the commander). It also tends to support the idea that a fully manned camp could have disrupted the attack to the point where the Zulu commanders were unable to respond. The addition of Durnford's men was never going to be enough to do this, but had those wandering about with Chelmsford been present they certainly might. My conclusion is that the battle was was not won by superior Zulu tactics but by sheer weight of numbers applied in a pretty haphazard way. Only a handful (how many, a dozen?) of the Zulu army had ever experienced anything like it and that had been 25 years before.
Steve |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10904 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:08 pm | |
| I also agree , sheer weight of numbers decided the Victor . 90th |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:19 pm | |
| Interesting point made about Durnfords men making the difference. I would tend towards the oft repeated call of 'if the men were massed' possibly in a square or up against the mountain. The volley fire would have destroyed the Zulu charges. At the Ndondokusuka battle Dunns 200 beat of, then drove back the right horn of the uThulwane, iSanqu, etc. Cetswayos army that day by the way was close to 20 000 strong. Will always believe that it was the right and left horns that won the battle of iSandlwana.
Interesting question: Who was the white man that fought for Cetswayo at Nondakusuka |
| | | rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:25 pm | |
| |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:33 pm | |
| Just a tad before my time, not by much mind you I will tell you that in all my reading Ive only ever heard his name mentioned once. |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:19 pm | |
| Zulu's would they have needed commanding, the order to attack surly would have been sufficient considering the Zulu traditional form of attack. The horns knew what they had to do as well as the chest their main aim would have been to complete the encircling around the enemy. If the timing was wrong the formation doesn't work. I can't think of the Battle, possibly Nyezane, but I believed the Zulu's failed because they didn't complete the formation. So would they have needed to be command when on the formation move. |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10904 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Command and Control Wed Jan 11, 2017 12:14 am | |
| Hi CTSG The Zulu didn't get their attacking strategy right at Kambula either , courtesy of Wood & Buller goading the ingobamakosi ( Right Horn ) into attacking before the left horn was in position . Had they attacked in unison it may well have been another massacre ! . Wood himself stated it was '' A close run thing '' . 90th |
| | | littlehand
Posts : 7076 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 55 Location : Down South.
| Subject: Re: Command and Control Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:16 pm | |
| - Chelmsfordthescapegoat wrote:
- Zulu's would they have needed commanding, the order to attack surly would have been sufficient considering the Zulu traditional form of attack. The horns knew what they had to do as well as the chest their main aim would have been to complete the encircling around the enemy. If the timing was wrong the formation doesn't work. I can't think of the Battle, possibly Nyezane, but I believed the Zulu's failed because they didn't complete the formation. So would they have needed to be command when on the formation move.
I'll go with this. |
| | | | Command and Control | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |