Latest topics | » Lieutenant Robert Henry Nelson, Baker’s Horse. Yesterday at 6:56 pm by 1879graves » Read and write? Thu Dec 07, 2023 5:48 pm by ADMIN» Marius Jespersen from Faroe Islands Tue Dec 05, 2023 3:53 pm by briannorris@sos.co.za » Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot  Tue Dec 05, 2023 8:52 am by briannorris@sos.co.za » Newspaper men (journalists) in the AZW Mon Dec 04, 2023 10:42 am by Stefaan » John Ford Webster in court Sun Dec 03, 2023 7:40 am by Eddie » The Messenger Sun Dec 03, 2023 7:31 am by Eddie » George Hocking Sat Dec 02, 2023 8:17 pm by 1879graves » Mainwaring 1879 map. Wed Nov 29, 2023 7:38 pm by SRB1965 » NNH losses at Isandlwana Wed Nov 29, 2023 12:49 pm by WeekendWarrior » Did Grant leave another account of the RB? Tue Nov 28, 2023 7:35 am by SRB1965 » Who paid the ferryman or men? Tue Nov 28, 2023 6:45 am by Stefaan » It's all Sir Garnet....except for the Doctor  Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:43 pm by Julian Whybra » Lance Corporal William Halley, Rorke's Drift Defender Sun Nov 26, 2023 3:40 pm by Julian Whybra » Trooper Christian Hayhow, Natal Carbineers Fri Nov 24, 2023 10:48 pm by aussie inkosi » Identification Fri Nov 24, 2023 2:04 pm by SRB1965 » Sporting guns Fri Nov 24, 2023 6:38 am by Stefaan » Commenwealth War Graves Commission Thu Nov 23, 2023 9:10 am by Kenny » Capt Francis Emberton. Wed Nov 22, 2023 4:08 am by Guest57 » List of Zulu War Veterans who emigrated to Australia and New Zealand Tue Nov 21, 2023 7:31 pm by John Young » Spare Weapons at Rorke's Drift Tue Nov 21, 2023 8:29 am by John Young » Captain The Honourable Julian Grenfell Mon Nov 20, 2023 7:50 pm by 1879graves » Lieutenant Richard Hawes MacCarthy, 2nd/4th Regiment  Mon Nov 20, 2023 6:55 am by krish » Grave of James Ruck Sun Nov 19, 2023 6:08 pm by Eddie » Eye Witness RD Sun Nov 19, 2023 5:08 pm by Eddie » Bettingtons Horse  Sun Nov 19, 2023 2:35 pm by John Young » Wanted - Looking For Zulu Items Mon Nov 13, 2023 5:48 pm by sekukuni » A farewell message Mon Nov 13, 2023 10:09 am by Julian Whybra » In deference to other online platforms discussing the history of the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 Sun Nov 12, 2023 3:50 pm by Julian Whybra » Drivers of the waggons? Sat Nov 11, 2023 11:22 pm by Julian Whybra » Old School Members Retreating.  Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:18 pm by ADMIN» Biscuit boxes at iSandlwana Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:53 pm by SRB1965 » NO TORTURE OF 'LITTLE DRUMMER BOYS' (OR ANYONE ELSE) AT ISANDLWANA Fri Nov 10, 2023 6:28 pm by Julian Whybra » Zulu accounts of certain aspects of Isandlwana  Fri Nov 10, 2023 5:52 pm by SRB1965 » Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ? Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:37 am by Julian Whybra |
December 2023 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
John Young

Posts : 3210 Join date : 2013-09-08 Age : 67 Location : Слава Україні! Героям слава!
 | Subject: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 2:00 pm | |
| Does anyone know how much ammunition was carried in an artillery limber?
If so what was the breakdown of ammunition between the varying types?
In hope,
JY |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8573 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 2:43 pm | |
| Major DD Hall South African Military history Society
"their empty jam tins to the Gunners, who were then able to make more case shot for their guns.
Isandlwana - 22nd January, 1879 Section N/5 Battery Two 7 prs Rocket Battery Three rocket troughs N/5 Battery (less one section) accompanied Lord Chelmsford on his abortive reconnaissance in force, and took no part in the battle. The Rocket Battery, with its equipment carried on mules, then accompanied Col Durnford's force when it also moved out of camp; but the battery was unable to keep up with the remainder. When firing was heard to their left, the Rocket Battery and its escort turned in that direction, but they were almost immediately engulfed by the Zulus. There was only time to get off one rocket before the enemy was upon them. Maj Stuart Smith, the Captain (or second in command) of N/5 Battery, returned from Lord Chelmsford's force before the Zulus attacked, and took command of the artillery left behind. This only amounted to one section of two guns-and fifty men left in camp. The Zulus advanced very rapidly when they attacked. The guns opened fire, but it was soon necessary to change to case shot, which is not normally used at ranges greater than 300 m. The two guns were quite incapable of stopping the Zulu masses. After a round or two, the order was given to retire. Maj Stuart Smith was wounded, and there were other casualties as well. There was no time for the men to take their seats on the guns and limbers when the guns moved off, and they had to run alongside the guns. The intention was to take up another position at the camp, but the Zulus were there first. The guns went straight through the camp, losing more men on the way. Eventually, they became stuck in a ravine, and the drivers, who now alone remained, were pulled off their horses and killed. There was no time to spike* the guns. {*To spike a gun, a spike (like a nail) was hammered into the vent, thus preventing the firing of the gun.} N/5 Battery had lost Maj Stuart Smith, 61 NCOs and men, two guns, 24 horses, 30 mules and 534 rounds of ammunition. The Rocket Battery lost Maj Russell, six men and all its equipment. Any help John?
|
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8573 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 2:46 pm | |
| And
PostSubject: Zulu War Artillery Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:54 pm Reply with quote
Good evening
This is the kind of information I found for the 9 PDRS RML gun in theThe South African Military History Society.
Military History Journal Vol 3 No 5 - June 1976 AMMUNITION — PART II 9-PR 8 cwt RML by MAJOR DD HALL
Shell, RML, shrapnel, 9 pr. It is possible that the fairly extensive use of shrapnel by the Royal Artillery resulted from the number issued to each gun. There were 96 shrapnel shells per gun, compared with 48 common smells and 4 case shot. The shrapnel shell had its interior filled with 63 bullets embedded in resin. Shrapnel was used against scattered troops and skirmishers in open, fairly level ground, beyond the effective range of case. It was considered to be merely case adapted to long ranges. Although the shell could be fired to 3200 m (3500 yds) at 11deg 27min elevation, the time fuze was effective only to 9 seconds which meant a shrapnel range of only 2 650 m (2 900 yds). |
|  | | Frank Allewell

Posts : 8573 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 76 Location : Cape Town South Africa
 | Subject: Re: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 2:47 pm | |
| I think the second post emanated from Pascall |
|  | | John Young

Posts : 3210 Join date : 2013-09-08 Age : 67 Location : Слава Україні! Героям слава!
 | Subject: Re: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:27 pm | |
| Frank,
Thanks that, I had the information in the first post, but I can’t say I’d seen that in the second post previously.
I know that Richard Harrison wrote a piece in the Royal Engineers Professional Papers, where he compared the British artillery with that of other armies, where he gave such information.
Regards,
JY |
|  | | John Young

Posts : 3210 Join date : 2013-09-08 Age : 67 Location : Слава Україні! Героям слава!
 | Subject: Re: Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber Mon Jan 15, 2018 5:17 pm | |
| Frank,
I followed the lead and I found Daryl Hall’s article on http://samilitaryhistory.org/vol035dh.html
The information regarding that on the limber is in a table near the end of the article.
Regards,
JY |
|  | | | Amount of ammunition carried in an artillery limber | |
|
Similar topics |  |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |