Latest topics | » Goldsmid DivorceYesterday at 2:11 pm by Eddie » Hlobane and Kambula by Col J M Cowper 2/4th Imperial Mounted Infantry?Yesterday at 9:49 am by ForlornHope » info on private williamsWed Jan 15, 2025 10:10 pm by Tim Needham » The Funeral of General Smith-Dorrien.Tue Jan 14, 2025 5:31 pm by Julian Whybra » Studies in the Zulu War Vol. VTue Jan 14, 2025 5:26 pm by Julian Whybra » What was your first Zulu War book.Tue Jan 14, 2025 3:29 pm by jgregory » London LettersMon Jan 13, 2025 11:53 pm by Petty Officer Tom » Statement about Archibald ForbesMon Jan 13, 2025 4:15 pm by Eddie » We Fired the Martini-Henry | Rifle of the Zulu WarSun Jan 12, 2025 10:55 pm by ADMIN» Artillerymen Buried at Fugitives Drift?Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:04 pm by Julian Whybra » The Battle of Ulundi Talk.Sun Jan 12, 2025 4:02 pm by ADMIN» Important "lost" artifact that should be at Brecon?Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:06 pm by ForlornHope » Animals at Rorkes Drift ?Sun Jan 12, 2025 9:34 am by SRB1965 » 9312 Sapper H Cuthbert 5th Field Coy RESun Jan 12, 2025 9:27 am by Julian Whybra » 25B/671 Pte. J. Machin 2/24th Regiment, KIA IsandlwanaSat Jan 11, 2025 9:46 am by jgregory » Did Ntishingwayo really not know Lord C wasn't at home Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:09 pm by Julian Whybra » Harry Richard Farquhar Sun Jan 05, 2025 3:09 pm by Eddie » Veterinary Surgeon GloverFri Jan 03, 2025 11:02 pm by 90th » The Passing of Lady Ellen Baker.Thu Jan 02, 2025 9:47 am by John Young » Happy New Year to the incredible communityWed Jan 01, 2025 9:01 am by Julian Whybra » Isandlwana casualty Tue Dec 31, 2024 10:04 am by Gibraltar » Christmas and 2025Tue Dec 31, 2024 12:17 am by 90th » Rorke's DriftSun Dec 29, 2024 4:41 pm by Eddie » Journal of the Royal Navy in the Zulu WarThu Dec 26, 2024 8:45 pm by z.oz » New Member - Zulu Film ScreenplayTue Dec 24, 2024 11:03 am by Coghill » Surgeon Major P. Shepherd Army Medical Department.Tue Dec 24, 2024 9:35 am by Julian Whybra » Anderson, A. 2622 2-24thMon Dec 23, 2024 3:04 pm by Julian Whybra » Lieut. R. F. Dixon NMRTue Dec 17, 2024 10:30 pm by Julian Whybra » Medal group to Henry Fanshawe Davies , Lt - Gen.Mon Dec 16, 2024 11:23 pm by 90th » Private 1148 John Edwin Camille 99th RegimentSun Dec 15, 2024 3:17 pm by gardner1879 » Rorke's Drift Diorama - 1:72 ScaleSun Dec 15, 2024 9:54 am by ArendH » Summerland, B. 1867 Private 1/24thSun Dec 08, 2024 6:11 pm by Dash » Royal Marine Light Infantry, ChathamSat Dec 07, 2024 3:55 pm by Petty Officer Tom » Private James Powell - 24th Regiment Wed Dec 04, 2024 4:00 am by 90th » George Champney Palmes - Medal at auctionTue Dec 03, 2024 5:34 pm by Dash |
January 2025 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
|
| They were really at Isandhlwana ? | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:17 am | |
| Hi all
The Zulu regiments Mbubi, amaShutu and amaKwenke ,were really at Isandhlwana ?
I'm reluctant to include these regiments within any formal list without the reinforce-ment of any firm primary (Zulu ) or secondary sources .
The only writer worth including here is A.W.Lee ,sometime Bishop of Zululand , who in his book published in 1949 ( Lee ,op.cit.,p.74.)recounted his experiences and meeting with various Zulus including Mehlokazulu in the early years of the twentieth century and it ought be remembered that bishop Lee lived and worked among the zulus , and wrote , albeit thirty years later ,from the vantage point of first - hand meetings with warriors who participed in the events of 1879.
There is another author who mentions these three regiments as being present at Isandhlwana ?
Cheers
Pascal The Rascal |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10921 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: They were really at Isandlwana Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:48 am | |
| Hi Rascal . Mbubi ( iMbube ) if they are the same unit they formed part of the right horn at Isandlwana according to Ian Knight in Zulu Rising . I've found the other two you named , but cant find if they were at Isandlwana or not . Cheers 90th . |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:55 am | |
| Hi Marsupial After Lee, they were all three at Isandhlwana, and after other modern authors, none of the three were And why they would not have the right to be there? Cheers Pascal The Rascal |
| | | littlehand
Posts : 7076 Join date : 2009-04-24 Age : 56 Location : Down South.
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:52 pm | |
| |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:22 am | |
| Little hand
Thank you, but it misses and some are not in their place . |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Mon Aug 05, 2013 10:58 am | |
| My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.
Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?
numbers present Left horn
Left of the left horn -ibuto uThulwane-numbers present:10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu.
Centre of the left horn-ibuto uVe -numbers present:13 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 650 men-Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana.
Centre of the left horn-ibuto umHlanga-numbers present :20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men -Source as a maximun figure based on Knight's list.
Right of the left horn-ibuto inGobamakhosi-numbers present : 80 amaviyo of 70 warriors= 5600 men -Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:19 am | |
| My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.
Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?
Chest
Left of the Chest-ibuto umBonambi-numbers present:30 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1500 men -Source based on the evidence of Mehlokazulu.
Left of the Chest-ibuto amaShutu-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source as a maximun figure based on A.W.Lee.
Left of the Chest-ibuto umXapho -numbers present:15 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 750 men-Source based on the evidence of Mehlokazulu.
Centre of the Chest-ibuto umCijo+ibutho unQakamamatye -numbers present:70 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 3500 men-Source based on the evidence of Mehlokazulu.
Centre of the Chest-ibuto uMtulisazwi -numbers present:30 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1500 men-Source based on the evidence of Mehlokazulu.
Right of the left horn-ibuto inGobamakhosi-numbers present : 80 amaviyo of 70 warriors= 5600 men -Source based on the evidence of Mpatshana and Mehlokazulu |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Mon Aug 05, 2013 11:38 am | |
| My opinion on the composition and numbers of the Main Zulu impi opposing the British Column N°.3 in January 1879.
Definitely ? Likely ? Why not ?
Right horn
Left of the right horn -ibuto Nokenke-numbers present:20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men -Source based on the evidence of Mehlokazulu.
Right of the right horn-ibuto uDududu -numbers present:20 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 1000 men-Source based on the evidence of Sihlahla.
Right of the right horn-ibuto Mbubi-numbers present :10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -Source as a maximun figure based on A.W.Lee.
Right of the right horn-ibuto umKhulutshane-numbers present :2 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 100 men -As an absolute maximun.
Right of the right horn-ibuto umsikaba-numbers present : 10 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 500 men -As an absolute maximun figures based on Knight's list.
Right of the right horn-ibuto Isanqu -numbers present:6 amaviyo of 50 warriors= 300 men-Source based on the evidence of Sihlahla. |
| | | Guest Guest
| | | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Tue Aug 06, 2013 1:27 pm | |
| No opponents? This is great |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10921 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: They were really at Isandlwana ? Tue Aug 06, 2013 2:57 pm | |
| Hi Rascal . As Springbok and I have said to you over the last year or so , the information you seek more than likely doesnt , or never existed in the first place . After all , it was only a 6 month war against a perceived primitive opponent . Those involved would never have believed in their wildest dreams that this small war would have the fascination it does 134 years on ! Marsy ! |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Tue Aug 06, 2013 3:35 pm | |
| Yes Marsupial but if the truth is aillor with sources that I give, I should not be far! |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: They were really at Isandhlwana ? Wed Aug 07, 2013 11:08 am | |
| In fact, I wonder if the Zulus were not many more at Isandhlwana, what was said ! |
| | | | They were really at Isandhlwana ? | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |