Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
WWW.1879ZULUWAR.COM
Lord Chelmsford Said .Buller is ‘one of the finest soldiers of the century’, so modest and reticent –that it was difficult to say for what individual deed he had got the Victoria Cross as he had been doing acts worthy of it all along the line
Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution.
Why LC has not joined Dartnell with all the troops in the camp of Isandhlwana !?
Cheers
PTR
90th
Posts : 10077 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 64 Location : Melbourne, Australia
Subject: Why LC .... Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:28 am
The easy answer is speed ! , he wanted to get there quickly , he didnt have time to pack the camp , especially at 2.30 am or thereabouts in the dark , which was I think when he received the message . 90th
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Why LC ... Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:36 am
Dartnell was not in danger, he demanded only white troops to attack the Zulu in front of him! LC could join with all his troops ...
90th
Posts : 10077 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 64 Location : Melbourne, Australia
Subject: Why LC ........... Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:21 am
LC was afraid the zulu's would move , he wanted to hit them quickly and hard , he couldnt do that if he's taking the whole column with him ! . 90th.
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Why LC ... Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:30 am
And then, if the Zulus had come, it would have been to attack the complet troops of the camp on the march! LC would have had his decisive battle and in much better conditions than those of Isandhlwana !
90th
Posts : 10077 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 64 Location : Melbourne, Australia
Subject: Why LC .... Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:35 am
Hi Rascal . I still find it hard to accept that the zulu wasnt more proactive and attempted to fight the slow moving columns , I think that would've been there ONLY chance of success . Then again they did try it at Inyezane with no success ! The success would probably been only short lived , but many more troops would've died . 90th
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Why LC ... Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:57 am
The British were not moving at Inyezane !!!
90th
Posts : 10077 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 64 Location : Melbourne, Australia
Subject: Why LC Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:22 am
Some of them were crossing the river as they were moving in two divisions . The Gatling gun was in the second division and had to be rushed forward from memory. 90th
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Why LC ... Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:15 am
Oh! In the past you had told me that some soldiers were bathing in the river when the NNC discovered the Zulu!
90th
Posts : 10077 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 64 Location : Melbourne, Australia
Subject: Why LC ...... Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:17 am
Rascal I doubt that very much ! . 90th
Guest Guest
Subject: Re: Why LC ... Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:50 am
In all cases, they had to return to the shore all speed to dress without dry ...
When you're naked in a river and you're told that impis arrive, you must beat them speed records in swimming and running:D
Home 
Gallery 
Search 
Register 
Log in 
