Latest topics | » Brothers SearsToday at 2:30 am by Eddie » Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.Yesterday at 4:15 pm by rai » A Bullet BibleMon Oct 07, 2024 11:41 am by Eddie » Shipping - transport in the AZWSun Oct 06, 2024 10:47 pm by Bill8183 » 1879 South Africa Medal named 1879 BARSun Oct 06, 2024 12:41 pm by Dash » A note on Captain Norris Edward Davey, Natal Volunteer Staff.Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:16 pm by Julian Whybra » Isandlwana papers he,d by the RE museum Sun Oct 06, 2024 6:06 am by 90th » An Irish V.C. conundrum?Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:51 am by Julian Whybra » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableFri Sep 27, 2024 9:12 am by Julian Whybra » William Moore / William Potter 24th RegimentThu Sep 26, 2024 3:04 pm by Dash » Stalybridge men in the 24thThu Sep 26, 2024 2:24 pm by Dash » Grave of Henry SpaldingWed Sep 25, 2024 3:24 pm by Kenny » Thomas P Kensole and James J MitchellMon Sep 23, 2024 4:04 pm by Samnoco » flocking stands to historical accuracySun Sep 22, 2024 8:05 pm by GCameron » Private 25B/483 Joseph Phelan 1/24th RegimentFri Sep 20, 2024 5:22 pm by Dash » Updated list of Zulu War Veterans who came to Australia or New ZealandFri Sep 20, 2024 12:31 am by krish » A story regarding Younghusband's charge. Hearsay or a possibility? Thu Sep 19, 2024 3:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Nine of the 24thThu Sep 19, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Colour Sergeant 2296 James Hannon HawkinsThu Sep 19, 2024 8:00 am by Samnoco » S.S. Solway Campbell/O'Keefe/Quigley 24th RegimentWed Sep 18, 2024 8:56 pm by Dash » Private 25B/2185 Owen Salmons alias Martin MacNamara? 1/24thWed Sep 18, 2024 8:44 pm by Bill8183 » Fort Evelyn and the grave of the 58th Regiment Drum MajorSun Sep 15, 2024 5:59 pm by 1879graves » Telescope v. field glassesSun Sep 15, 2024 10:20 am by 90th » Photo Lonsdales HorseTue Sep 10, 2024 10:10 pm by ciroferrara » Soldier 13th regiment of foot Natal new photo Tue Sep 10, 2024 8:32 pm by ciroferrara » Private 1941 Samuel MacClue / McClune 1/24th RegimentMon Sep 09, 2024 1:33 pm by Dash » Lieutenant & Adjutant Spencer Frederick Chichester, 2nd 21stMon Sep 09, 2024 11:56 am by Rory Reynolds » In search of the 80th FootSun Sep 08, 2024 6:39 pm by Julian Whybra » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:43 pm by Dash » THE DISTINGUISHED CONDUCT MEDALThu Sep 05, 2024 11:16 pm by Julian Whybra » 9312 Sapper H Cuthbert 5th Field Coy REWed Sep 04, 2024 11:53 am by Julian Whybra » Who’s who in this photo?Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:44 pm by ianwood » Sir Robert William Jackson Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Memorial to WolseleySun Sep 01, 2024 8:47 pm by John Young » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaSun Sep 01, 2024 7:51 am by Julian Whybra |
October 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » A Bullet BibleSun Oct 06, 2024 8:02 pm by Eddie » Shipping - transport in the AZWSun Oct 06, 2024 3:23 pm by Bill8183 » Isandlwana papers he,d by the RE museum Thu Oct 03, 2024 3:01 pm by Danny1960 » An Irish V.C. conundrum?Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:17 am by Julian Whybra » A note on Captain Norris Edward Davey, Natal Volunteer Staff.Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:25 pm by lydenburg » Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.Thu Sep 26, 2024 10:12 am by Samnoco » Grave of Henry SpaldingWed Sep 25, 2024 12:43 pm by Richard Spalding » Stalybridge men in the 24thTue Sep 24, 2024 6:48 pm by Dash » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableFri Sep 20, 2024 4:54 pm by Julian Whybra |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics! | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
lydenburg
Posts : 15 Join date : 2017-06-19
| Subject: Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics! Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:37 am | |
| Whilst reading through an 1879 volume of the satirical magazine "Punch", I came across the following in its 5th April number. It is quite "informed" as well as being cynical and readers to this site - if they don't already know it - might find it amusing and interesting!
"Lord Chelmsford before entering on the Zulu "campaign" published a handy little pamphlet for the information of his officers and men, in which he gave rules for conducting hostilities in Africa. From the desponding and doleful tone of some of his recent despatches, his Lordship's retirement from his command seems not an impossible contingency. It would be a pity if his Lordship should carry out this intention till he has appended an additional chapter to his instructive and (when followed) no doubt useful brochure, something to this effect:
Chapter Last: How to ensure a Defeat and how to behave under it.
Having carefully perused and mastered the above rules for successfully engaging the Zulus, all that now remains will be deliberately to march in their teeth. Knowing that a strongly-fortified camp is the key and nucleus of defence against this vigilant and active enemy, the commanding officer should quietly move out with the bulk of his force, leaving the tents unentrenched and the waggons unparked "in laager". He may, at the same time, send verbal orders that the camp is to be defended. If the enemy presents himself, he cannot do wrong to follow him up. It will be time enough when the enemy proves himself to be a Will-o-the-Wisp, whose object has been to mislead and draw away the opposing force, and treat him accordingly. While advancing, he had better not weaken his force by detaching scouting or reconnaissance parties and should turn a deaf ear to all such disquieting reports as that firing is going on in the direction of the camp he has left behind him. There will be no harm if, in order to show the sense of the responsibility of his position, he later in the day orders one of his Staff to go to the top of a hill with a telescope, and look towards the camp. He will, of course, be satisfied by the assurance of the Staff officer "that he thinks it's all right". If late in the evening he sees reasons to suspect that the enemy have been playing him a trick, as savages will, his best course will probably be to fall back on his camp, and should he find the camp destroyed, the stores plundered and its defenders slaughtered to a man, it will be his duty to put up with this extremely disagreeable state of things with all the equanimity he can command. Now is the time for extreme caution. Should there be reason to conclude that the enemy is moving off, and that he must be encumbered with spoil, the best plan will be to let him go unmolested. On the other hand, should he come across a handful of men who have held a position of the utmost importance against overwhelming odds for a long winter's night, he may safely "thank them very much". After this, he should lose no time in instituting a strict Official Inquiry into how the mischief has come about. Should it be proved by "supplementary testimony" (furnished by officers of his personal staff) that the Commander in Chief is not responsible and that someone else has been to blame, all the better for the Commander in Chief, and all the worse for somebody else. Having brought matters to this point, he will stand aside and wait for events. Should the Colonists chafe and the indignant British Lion growl, he may suggest that an officer of rank be sent out immediately to assist him and, if need be, to take his place. He may at the same time remeber that for a very long time he has not been at all well. Lastly, should the growl of the British Lion get so loud as to be annoying, if he feels that more responsibility is being thrown upon him than he can bear, there will be nothing for it but to pack up his cocked hat and writing desk and come home! |
| | | SRB1965
Posts : 1238 Join date : 2017-05-13 Age : 59 Location : Uttoxeter - the last place God made and he couldn't be bothered to finish it.....
| Subject: Re: Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics! Wed Apr 03, 2024 5:17 pm | |
| Interesting because despite the CoI findings only being released in March, it mentions the 'verbal' order to entrench the camp.....
|
| | | | Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics! | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |