Latest topics | » 100,000 posts!Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN» Your favourite line from Zulu or Zulu DawnSat Mar 16, 2024 2:47 pm by jgregory » Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ?Sat Mar 16, 2024 2:34 pm by jgregory » Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Sat Mar 16, 2024 11:05 am by John Young » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Fri Mar 15, 2024 9:08 am by Julian Whybra » British rations and moraleMon Mar 11, 2024 11:05 pm by Julian Whybra » Blue Plaque to James Egan, alias Private HaganMon Mar 11, 2024 9:16 pm by ADMIN» A few questions regarding Rorke's Drift and IsandlwanaWed Mar 06, 2024 9:16 pm by Julian Whybra » William J Hoare 24th Regiment??Sun Mar 03, 2024 7:08 pm by Dash » Swinburn Carbine issue in AZWThu Feb 29, 2024 12:53 pm by Rob D » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:39 am by John Young » Philip Price Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:55 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds » August Hammar Letter Dated 6th Jan 1879Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:34 pm by Stefaan » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:57 am by Julian Whybra » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:47 am by Julian Whybra » About the second invasionTue Feb 20, 2024 9:14 pm by 90th » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young » Watford band boys killed at iSandlwanaFri Feb 16, 2024 8:26 am by Julian Whybra » Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot Sun Feb 11, 2024 3:10 am by 90th » Death of Michael Jayson (Zulu Dawn)Thu Feb 08, 2024 9:55 pm by ADMIN» The anniversary of 22nd January in 2024Thu Feb 08, 2024 3:51 pm by luke1997 » What was the distance?Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:46 am by Stefaan » Mrs Henry HookTue Feb 06, 2024 3:14 pm by Kenny » "With 6 good riflemen"Mon Feb 05, 2024 2:30 pm by Mr M. Cooper » What was G company supposed to do?Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:31 pm by Julian Whybra » Private 1445 Charles Meates 17th Lancers and his brother William WylieFri Feb 02, 2024 10:07 pm by John Young » South Africa Medal With Clasp To Pvt J. Salter 3/60thFri Feb 02, 2024 3:12 pm by Foody » Weatherleys Border Horse FlagThu Feb 01, 2024 9:40 pm by Herbie » Edward Plantagenet Kemeys-TynteTue Jan 23, 2024 10:06 pm by Edjg » How many started?Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:10 am by Julian Whybra » Firing Line formationMon Jan 22, 2024 2:32 pm by Julian Whybra » Why did Maj. Spalding have to go ?Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:40 pm by Stefaan » Grape-shot at close range.Mon Jan 15, 2024 7:42 am by SRB1965 » Books Hlobane & KambulaTue Jan 09, 2024 10:08 am by John Young |
March 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » 100,000 posts!Sun Mar 17, 2024 11:14 am by ADMIN» Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Fri Mar 15, 2024 8:27 pm by Rob Herrick » British rations and moraleWed Mar 06, 2024 9:24 pm by Hobbes » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:47 am by RoryReynolds » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Fri Feb 23, 2024 2:23 am by peterfarrell » About the second invasionSat Feb 17, 2024 9:53 pm by Hobbes » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 7:35 pm by John Young » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Thu Feb 15, 2024 4:46 pm by Will M » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:24 am by ADMIN |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance | |
|
+3Julian Whybra Frank Allewell aussie inkosi 7 posters | |
Author | Message |
---|
Tig Van Milcroft
Posts : 128 Join date : 2022-02-21
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Tue Mar 29, 2022 1:57 pm | |
| Frank, I also have niggles about that message. It says everything and nothing, everything if you think the main Zulu Impi is advancing and nothing if it refers to a small force of Zulus advancing. It does capture the paucity of accurate information in the posession of Pulleine at the time (8-05am) of the Zulu intentions. It should though have caused a reaction from Chelmsford who until this point had no reservations as to the security of his flank in this direction.
If as I pointed out in an earlier post Chelmsford had co-ordinated Vedette information to go through himself rather than be filtered by the Camp he would have a better perspective of the relative threats to the entire force.
Chelmsford had allowed a very large Zulu force to insert itself undetected between the two elements of his divided command and failed to co-ordinate the flow analysis and assessment of intelligence received, of which there was much of substance.
|
| | | Tig Van Milcroft
Posts : 128 Join date : 2022-02-21
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Tue Mar 29, 2022 2:16 pm | |
| This thread started off about the action on and around the Spur. I have looked at Ansteys map and Mainwaring maps, of the two Ansteys map looks much the most accurate when I compare to the (I hope) real world of Google. Vedette A and the NNC Piquet are marked, though I do not know if there is a real world actual posiiton established for the NNC Piquet. The position marked on Ansteys map provides much better visibility to the NW than the N & NE, but the Vedette A could compensate for this.
Referencing Clery on Minor Tactics, the Piquest requires patrolling from and a relatively speaking strong and defensable position sometihng like a Kraal would serve somewhere atop the Spur and close to the trackway. The strength of the piquet sufficient to provide support to patrols under fire, to defend itself against attack and or to be able to conduct a fighting retreat to the main body. This would require the piquet position to have one or both flanks secured, which suggest a positon close to the trackway and the escarpement edge.
There does not appear to have been much patrolling going on by the NNC, they were probably all together in the piquet, this would of course limit the intel quite a lot. For anybody used to receiving reports from a Regular Army piquet this may well lead to a misintepretation of what actually was going on.
This Piquet positioning and logic outlined in Minor Tactics is similar to infantry support to advancing cavalry such as Durnford requested before leaving camp, which begs a further question as to what level of support Durnford was actually requesting of Pulleine. I suggest that this could be a little as a company told off to give fire support to a retreating cavalry, not requiring a loss of contact with the main camp defense. |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Tue Mar 29, 2022 5:21 pm | |
| Frank Pulleine's behaviour comes back to adherence to Clery's order: "...but keep your cavalry still far advanced", "keep your cavalry still far advanced", and "keep a sharp look out with your Cavalry" i.e. NOTHING added about 'sending out cavalry patrols or reconnaissance'. Pulleine simply believed what LC - Clery - Crealock were saying viz. that the main impi lay on the track ahead and they left that morning to intercept it. |
| | | aussie inkosi
Posts : 426 Join date : 2013-09-16 Age : 58 Location : MELBOURNE
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:13 am | |
| - Tig Van Milcroft wrote:
- Aussie, Back home. Your points include some assumptions that may or may not be correct, we will probably never know. But to eleborate.
That 5000 Zulus were moving north of the camp was the reason the Durnford instructed a reconnaissance. 5000 Zulus were not likely to overcome the firepower available in the camp. Even less so if their position and strength was understood before there approached it.
Until Durnford's arrival in camp a reconnaissance was not possible because there were so few mounted troops left by Chelmsford. That infers that there was no serious threat to camp anticipated by the commanding officer Chelmsford. Orders were left to "defend the camp" though I have not seen a transcript of the full order. No experienced officer would leave a camp denuded of reconnaissance troops, and with more than half of its firepower mobilised to attack a "stronghold" 12 miles remote formt he camp, if there was any risk of the full force of the enemy army could be applied to the camp in its absence. That was the mindset of everybody engaged in the British force prior to Raw's discovery.
Pulleine himself may have instructed a similar reconnaissance if he had the forces able to carry it out prior to Durnford's arrival, I think this is likely, he had experience of mounted forces and their uses.
The only point of difference was the disagreement about taking Imp Infantry. The outcome would have been very different if RAW,Durnford Barton and Roberts had drawn 5000 Zulus in to attack the camp rather than the 20,000 that actually did.
To take you second point about standing back to back etc, Pulleine could have ordered this, at any time after receving Raws report. He did not, the responsibility for not doing so is his. That is not to say that what you suggest was or was not the best option. The "drawing of men out of camp" caused few casualties amongst Imp Forces and we know many more in the Zulu forces, especially those facing the retreating Basutos in the Dongas. Concentration may still have been an option even late on, before it became the last ditch option for individual companies prior to complete rout.
The "Back to back" stance you describe would be completely appropriate, if you believe you were deploying in advance to face 20,000 Zulus, that was sinmply not the case here. Pulleine deployed to "Defend the camp" not the the forces. To lose the camp and livestock aone would destroy the ability of the force to move, to lose the ammunition and supplies would be to lose the force. The "Defend the Camp" order was the reason for the loss of the men Pulleine never had enough men to achieve the task, though he possibly could have ensured the survival of some of his troops.
I am still of the view that reconnaissance in force to determine what the Zulu forces intentions were was the sensible thing to do given the "mindset" described above. If the whole force had been present instead of the most pwerful part conducting operations 12 miles away to no effect, we would be having a different discussion. Sorry for the delay Tig, Van broke down then one of my machines. Nightmare week thus far Those 5,000 that moved behind Isandlwana were there to close the back door, and cause other sorts of grief, all Durnford done when he heard of it is to place a look out on top of Isandlwana, nothing after that, its then next mentioned by Melvill when its to late. Durnfords purpose of moving Raw and Roberts to the valley beyond Mkwene was to sweep it from Zulus, and that is what the Zulu wanted. Once the discovery was made there was only 15 minutes until they got to Mkwene its to late to strike the tents down. Weather you do a recon or sweep the valley from Zulus it still requires men to leave the camp and that was the Zulu intention. Craftiness is the best word to describe it. |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:11 pm | |
| Aussie "...that is what the Zulu wanted." How can you possibly write this? There is no source describing what the Zulus wanted and they would have had no idea what Durnford would do once he'd arrived in camp - if, indeed, they even noticed he HAD arrived in camp. From their morning observations they would have realized that there were few mounted troops left in camp and any manoeuvring they did carry out could not possibly have been with the intention of 'luring out' the few such men who were there.
|
| | | aussie inkosi
Posts : 426 Join date : 2013-09-16 Age : 58 Location : MELBOURNE
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:56 pm | |
| Julian
There is no source describing what the Zulus wanted and they would have had no idea what Durnford would do once he'd arrived in camp That is Why those 600 retired, Julian you are looking for sources the source is in the location of the discovery.
The Zulu saw Durnford enter the camp read Davies and then they devised a plan to get him to leave the camp. |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 1:50 pm | |
| Aussie "...the source is in the location of the discovery." As you well know, that is not a source; it is wishful thinking. No historian worth his salt would endorse it.
"The Zulu saw Durnford enter the camp read Davies and then they devised a plan to get him to leave the camp." And that is pure supposition on your part. We can't invent facts to order.
Last edited by Julian Whybra on Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
| | | WeekendWarrior
Posts : 268 Join date : 2017-07-21 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 6:26 pm | |
| I wonder if Durnford was actually Ntshingwayo in disguise. |
| | | aussie inkosi
Posts : 426 Join date : 2013-09-16 Age : 58 Location : MELBOURNE
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 9:00 pm | |
| Julian The reason no Historian has endorsed its because they still have the Zulu in the historical location, the facts are in the testimonies which have been interpreted incorrectly,
Julian , facts are Durnford responded to a Zulu retirement move, nothing can change that.
Its probably best I stop trying to convince anyone
The Zulu did such a great job that over 140 years after the fact it is still hidden |
| | | Julian Whybra
Posts : 3945 Join date : 2011-09-12 Location : Billericay, Essex
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:56 pm | |
| "...facts are Durnford responded to a Zulu retirement move, nothing can change that."
Of course not, but that is not what you're trying to prove. You are wanting to say, as a fact, that the Zulu deliberately retired in the full knowledge that Durnford would chase after them. It isn't a fact and how could they possibly know what Durnford, or Pulleine come to that, would do (after all, the Zulus didn't know who had seniority). Indeed, they didn't know what orders LC had left for the camp. |
| | | aussie inkosi
Posts : 426 Join date : 2013-09-16 Age : 58 Location : MELBOURNE
| Subject: Re: James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance Wed Mar 30, 2022 11:56 pm | |
| |
| | | | James Hamer testimony concerning time and distance | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |