Latest topics | » Brothers SearsToday at 2:30 am by Eddie » Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.Yesterday at 4:15 pm by rai » A Bullet BibleMon Oct 07, 2024 11:41 am by Eddie » Shipping - transport in the AZWSun Oct 06, 2024 10:47 pm by Bill8183 » 1879 South Africa Medal named 1879 BARSun Oct 06, 2024 12:41 pm by Dash » A note on Captain Norris Edward Davey, Natal Volunteer Staff.Sun Oct 06, 2024 12:16 pm by Julian Whybra » Isandlwana papers he,d by the RE museum Sun Oct 06, 2024 6:06 am by 90th » An Irish V.C. conundrum?Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:51 am by Julian Whybra » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableFri Sep 27, 2024 9:12 am by Julian Whybra » William Moore / William Potter 24th RegimentThu Sep 26, 2024 3:04 pm by Dash » Stalybridge men in the 24thThu Sep 26, 2024 2:24 pm by Dash » Grave of Henry SpaldingWed Sep 25, 2024 3:24 pm by Kenny » Thomas P Kensole and James J MitchellMon Sep 23, 2024 4:04 pm by Samnoco » flocking stands to historical accuracySun Sep 22, 2024 8:05 pm by GCameron » Private 25B/483 Joseph Phelan 1/24th RegimentFri Sep 20, 2024 5:22 pm by Dash » Updated list of Zulu War Veterans who came to Australia or New ZealandFri Sep 20, 2024 12:31 am by krish » A story regarding Younghusband's charge. Hearsay or a possibility? Thu Sep 19, 2024 3:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Nine of the 24thThu Sep 19, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Colour Sergeant 2296 James Hannon HawkinsThu Sep 19, 2024 8:00 am by Samnoco » S.S. Solway Campbell/O'Keefe/Quigley 24th RegimentWed Sep 18, 2024 8:56 pm by Dash » Private 25B/2185 Owen Salmons alias Martin MacNamara? 1/24thWed Sep 18, 2024 8:44 pm by Bill8183 » Fort Evelyn and the grave of the 58th Regiment Drum MajorSun Sep 15, 2024 5:59 pm by 1879graves » Telescope v. field glassesSun Sep 15, 2024 10:20 am by 90th » Photo Lonsdales HorseTue Sep 10, 2024 10:10 pm by ciroferrara » Soldier 13th regiment of foot Natal new photo Tue Sep 10, 2024 8:32 pm by ciroferrara » Private 1941 Samuel MacClue / McClune 1/24th RegimentMon Sep 09, 2024 1:33 pm by Dash » Lieutenant & Adjutant Spencer Frederick Chichester, 2nd 21stMon Sep 09, 2024 11:56 am by Rory Reynolds » In search of the 80th FootSun Sep 08, 2024 6:39 pm by Julian Whybra » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Sun Sep 08, 2024 4:43 pm by Dash » THE DISTINGUISHED CONDUCT MEDALThu Sep 05, 2024 11:16 pm by Julian Whybra » 9312 Sapper H Cuthbert 5th Field Coy REWed Sep 04, 2024 11:53 am by Julian Whybra » Who’s who in this photo?Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:44 pm by ianwood » Sir Robert William Jackson Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Memorial to WolseleySun Sep 01, 2024 8:47 pm by John Young » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaSun Sep 01, 2024 7:51 am by Julian Whybra |
October 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » A Bullet BibleSun Oct 06, 2024 8:02 pm by Eddie » Shipping - transport in the AZWSun Oct 06, 2024 3:23 pm by Bill8183 » Isandlwana papers he,d by the RE museum Thu Oct 03, 2024 3:01 pm by Danny1960 » An Irish V.C. conundrum?Tue Oct 01, 2024 10:17 am by Julian Whybra » A note on Captain Norris Edward Davey, Natal Volunteer Staff.Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:25 pm by lydenburg » Ford Park Cemetery, Plymouth.Thu Sep 26, 2024 10:12 am by Samnoco » Grave of Henry SpaldingWed Sep 25, 2024 12:43 pm by Richard Spalding » Stalybridge men in the 24thTue Sep 24, 2024 6:48 pm by Dash » Studies in the Zulu War volume VI now availableFri Sep 20, 2024 4:54 pm by Julian Whybra |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | 2100 Members | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
90th
Posts : 10909 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: 2100 Members Fri Jan 15, 2016 12:26 pm | |
| Currently we are 2096 , I think within 3 or 4 days we'll hit the 2100 mark ! 90th |
| | | rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:41 pm | |
| Gary What would be really welcome is if we could persuade more than 1% of them to post something! Steve |
| | | waterloo50
Posts : 600 Join date : 2013-09-18 Location : West Country
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Fri Jan 15, 2016 11:53 pm | |
| The new members numbers are great, and I agree with rusteze on the his comment about getting more people to post but I think that the reason new members don't is because sometimes this forum can be a little intimidating, especially if people are new to the subject. I have seen several new members make a post, they normally introduce themselves and start by asking a question, unfortunately the response that they get is often something along the lines of 'We have discussed this before, take a look at this link or they are ignored, you may not realise it but that happens quite a lot. I'm not accusing anyone of anything here but sometimes the forum can be a little negative, now, you may be thinking to yourselves that Waterloo is bitching and moaning again but the truth is I am still in contact with a few people that are newish members that no longer feel that they wish to participate, recently we lost a member who had a relative killed at Isandlwana, he is himself still in the military and his ideas and thoughts were quite valuable, but as he has told me, he just can't be bothered to post anymore, he felt that his posts were being pushed aside and that people did not want to engage in a conversation with him. I am hoping that after he reads this he will come back onto the forum to validate what I am saying. I have thought about my own experiences as a new member on the forum and the biggest problem was and perhaps still is my lack of knowledge, what would really help perhaps is something along the lines of a new thread for new members to discuss the basics of the AZW, there are plenty of knowledgeable people on this forum that new members could turn to for advice and information. We have got access to some professional historians/Authors and people like Frank who have good access to the sites along with a wealth of information. The new thread could be treated as a beginners introduction to the AZW. Wouldn't it be better to respond to a new members post with an invitation to discuss the basics of the AZW in a beginners thread. I would have found it really helpful if someone had said to me, why don't you join the discussion thread called 'An introduction to the AZW'. that would have been really helpful instead of me trying to work at Diploma level in a class full of Masters and Phd students.
I hope that makes sense. |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:36 am | |
| People will join in if they want to. Most join to look for information about a particular thing or person. There could be many reasons why new members don't post, the first step is always the hardest. And no doubt the many heated debates is enough to to put anyone off. I think the ones that post are good enough, even with the small number that post, something new always seems to come to light, something that's draws a lot of interest. One day it will come to light, that the Good Lord Chelmsford did an excellent job during this small campaign. |
| | | Dave
Posts : 1603 Join date : 2009-09-21
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 9:09 am | |
| This Forum 69974 Messages have been posted by the small number that contribute. Now in anyone's book that's not bad.
Victorian War forum 5804 Members. 52708 messages posted.
RDVC 608 Members. 27664 Messages posted. |
| | | waterloo50
Posts : 600 Join date : 2013-09-18 Location : West Country
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:32 am | |
| - Chelmsfordthescapegoat wrote:
- People will join in if they want to. Most join to look for information about a particular thing or person.
There could be many reasons why new members don't post, the first step is always the hardest. And no doubt the many heated debates is enough to to put anyone off. I think the ones that post are good enough, even with the small number that post, something new always seems to come to light, something that's draws a lot of interest. One day it will come to light, that the Good Lord Chelmsford did an excellent job during this small campaign. Hello CTSG Absolutely agree with you on 'the first step is always the hardest' and without a doubt some of the debates do get a bit heated, it takes a strong will to continue sometimes, people can over step the mark with their comments but you soon learn to shrug it off and continue on. When your new to the subject every bit of info is interesting and there have been some very good points raised on the forum, I didn't realise that it was possible to go into a subject in such depth as happens here. With regards to Lord Chelmsford, I expect that you are enjoying the debate ( Exactly was Lord Chelmsford Guilty of) I don't know that anyone has managed to clearly answer that yet. Kindest Regards Waterloo |
| | | Dave
Posts : 1603 Join date : 2009-09-21
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:41 am | |
| CTSG knows LC as to shoulder a portion of the blame! If I recall, I think CTSG said LC was to blame, for his choice of officers.
|
| | | waterloo50
Posts : 600 Join date : 2013-09-18 Location : West Country
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:42 am | |
| - Dave wrote:
- This Forum 69974 Messages have been posted by the small number that contribute.
Now in anyone's book that's not bad.
Victorian War forum 5804 Members. 52708 messages posted.
RDVC 608 Members. 27664 Messages posted. Spot on with the figures but if you remove even a small percentage of the regular posters on this site then the numbers drop significantly and that may well be the case for other sites. The good thing about this forum is there is always someone posting something and hats off to those that start new topics, they are needed. Sometimes people ask questions that have already been discussed, I don't think that there is anything wrong going over old ground especially when new evidence comes to light, in some respects revisiting some of the older threads can be beneficial especially for new members. |
| | | waterloo50
Posts : 600 Join date : 2013-09-18 Location : West Country
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:47 am | |
| - Dave wrote:
- CTSG knows LC as to shoulder a portion of the blame!
If I recall, I think CTSG said LC was to blame, for his choice of officers.
At the moment, unless anything new has been added, I haven't read the Exactly what was LC guilty of' thread yet, the main gripe seems to be about the officers, it will be interesting to see how that develops. |
| | | rusteze
Posts : 2871 Join date : 2010-06-02
| Subject: Re: 2100 Members Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:27 am | |
| Something we might consider. People are understandably reluctant to post for the first time for all the reasons discussed. But they might be happy just to indicate (perhaps from a tick list) what they are particularly interested in. This could even be made a condition of joining. Others could then offer up some thoughts on those subjects and that might encourage a response. We need to make it easier to participate
Steve |
| | | | 2100 Members | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |