» Hassard Fairfax Charles.
Yesterday at 12:10 pm by rai
» Captain/ Sub Assistant Commissary Joseph Stead Army Commissariat Department
Yesterday at 11:49 am by rai
» Captain Archibald Graham Wavell 9th Regiment
Yesterday at 9:42 am by rai
» Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry Dinner, pre-October 1927
Yesterday at 9:00 am by Julian Whybra
» Replica Medals
Yesterday at 8:54 am by Julian Whybra
» Private 50B/371 Henry Ushen / Usher 57th Regiment
Yesterday at 8:43 am by rai
» Surruier Captain RE?
Yesterday at 2:08 am by Eddie
» Alfred Saxty
Yesterday at 1:25 am by 90th
» Private 3235 W J Blackmore 3/60th Regiment
Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:20 am by rai
» Commander Edward Duffett Naval Brigade
Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:42 am by rai
» Lance Corporal 13747 John Watson 30th Company Royal Engineers
Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:46 am by rai
» Sapper 13977 Henry Joseph Higgs 5th Company Royal Engineers
Wed Mar 29, 2023 11:21 am by rai
» Bugler 116 Sam Styles 90th Regiment
Wed Mar 29, 2023 10:33 am by rai
» Private 2074 William Barker, 1st King's Dragoon Guards
Tue Mar 28, 2023 11:59 am by rai
» Private 1246 Ernest? Mitchell 2/4th Regiment
Tue Mar 28, 2023 11:32 am by rai
» Corporal 25B/1139 Jonathan Smart 2/24th
Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:23 am by rai
» Private 1734 Edwin Charles Clarke 57th Regiment
Tue Mar 28, 2023 9:51 am by rai
» Private 65B/2370 Henry Francis Jarvis 94th Regiment Bronkhorst Spruit survivor
Tue Mar 28, 2023 9:30 am by rai
» Private 45/517 Francis Kerslake / Kersdake 2/3rd Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 12:10 pm by rai
» Private 11/2903 George Henry Squibb 2/4th Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 11:44 am by rai
» Sapper 13520 Charles Benford 30th Company Royal Engineers
Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:30 am by rai
» Corporal 45/1026 John Henry Jacobs 2/3rd Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:53 am by rai
» Corporal Albert Smart Natal Mounted Police
Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:44 am by rai
» James Cumberland
Mon Mar 27, 2023 7:41 am by rai
» Captain H M Saunders 58th Regiment
Sun Mar 26, 2023 12:22 pm by John Young
» Private 115 Richard Suggett / Suggell 2/21st Regiment
Sun Mar 26, 2023 10:35 am by rai
» Private 2137 Thomas Edwards 17th Lancers , Valentine Baker, Corporal 1558 Thomas Bailey 17th Lancers
Sun Mar 26, 2023 10:28 am by rai
» Thomas Edwards
Sun Mar 26, 2023 9:43 am by rai
» Captain Alfred Godwin Godwin-Austen, 24th (2nd Warwickshire) Regiment of Foot
Sun Mar 26, 2023 9:03 am by rai
» Major-General CHERRY-GARRARD,
Sat Mar 25, 2023 11:18 am by ADMIN
» Sergeant 2195 Walter C Low / Lott 17th Lancers
Sat Mar 25, 2023 10:40 am by rai
» Private 1934 J Brewer and Private 1919 J Bathe 99th Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:39 am by rai
» Private 1118 William Laws, 90th Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:22 am by rai
» Time keeping at isandlwana
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:20 am by Frank Allewell
» Lieutenant R T H Law 77th (East Middlesex) Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 8:25 am by rai
|Top posting users this month|
|Fair Use Notice|
|Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
Zulu's account of Isandlwana.
Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 54
Location : Down South.
|Subject: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:37 pm|| |
Posts : 61
Join date : 2010-02-01
Age : 72
Location : Devon, UK
|Subject: Re: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Sun Mar 14, 2010 9:59 pm|| |
This is possibly an account of someone who heard the story about the "fish that got away"
There was an account given by Mehlokazulu son of Sirayo (local chief at Isandlwana) who was with the Zulu left horn that was published 27 Sept 1879. His account is pretty consistent in detail with that of other witnesses on both sides.
There is lots of physical evidence that contradicts this account. Lots of cartridge cases found far out and the solar eclipse contradict the assertion that the men were at dinner when the attack occurred.
Posts : 600
Join date : 2010-01-07
Location : UK
|Subject: Re: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:33 am|| |
yes i agree with you that there is alot of evidence against that acount, but just think that accoun might explain why there was such huge losses because the british were suprised. There is also a bit of evidence for this account aswell lke the main one tha tents were never struck.
just think what if that was the actual story and the account we hear is just a huge cover up because they didnt want the public to know just how humiliatiing it really was.
Although i do still agree that the british were prepared and standing ready to fight as in the film zulu dawn, but is that the real story and hiw it really happens and it asks many questions
Posts : 747
Join date : 2009-10-18
|Subject: Re: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:14 am|| |
We can't dismiss any accounts told by the Zulu's. The Zulu giving this account is only stating what he saw and what he was told. The Zulu''s had nothing to lose by lieing the day was there's. He is suggesting that the battle was won due to the surprise attack, so what but what would the out-come have been if the British had been prepared. The tents would have been struck, defensive positions would have been organised, ammunition points established. The British have it the past fought and won against greater odds than that of Isandlwana because they were ready. So for me there is some foundation to this account.
Posts : 8423
Join date : 2009-09-21
Age : 76
Location : Cape Town South Africa
|Subject: Re: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:03 pm|| |
Interesting reading Littlehand.
Its no suprise, the quotes from Popes diary. The regiments were stood to and then stood down. Many accounts of that, including complaints that breakfsat was served for lunch and it was cold.
There are far and away to many accounts of the troops forming up in there defensive line. Plus the evidence of the graves and findings of the amunition, amunition box bands etc.
The concept of a mass cover up cant really be entertained with any amount of cedibility.
Especially coming from an UNAMED source.
My arguments against this source are: Whilst the grass in January is long and green, the aproaches to the firing lines are uphill. Even sneaking through the grass the troops would be looking down on the Zulu. To get to the plain the Zulu would have to descend from the nqutu plateau. Again impossible without being seen.
As a possible explanation for the "eye witness account". If he was in the right horn, it would be possible for him to have crept along the Manzimyama stream bed then up the slope behind the mountain, over the sadddle and at that point he would have been virtually in the camp area. No tents struck and highly possible caught the odd few soldiers finishing lunch and in shirt sleeves.
I say possible, not probable.
We also need to be aware that for some time after the battle, even up to present day, all sorts of theories, eye witnesses etc have been dragged forward to try and explain the most vexing questions. The news papers of thime were full of different accounts, one even proffesed to have a map drawn by a survivor showing a huge trench into the heart of the camp.
The source is unsubstantiated guys.
Posts : 600
Join date : 2010-01-07
Location : UK
|Subject: Re: Zulu's account of Isandlwana. Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:10 pm|| |
Its a very though provoking accoun tisnt it. I think if the british were prepared then they would have still lost but not to such a huge degree. If they had time to prepare then they would have had a better chance of winning the battle and maybe would have had time to order a more strategic retreat and maybe more than the 55 or so would have surived and would be no need for a second invasion-thats just based on the zulu account
the british didnt really have an y chance of winning 30,000 zulus to 900 british isnt really good odds to have is it.
Which starts another question- if chelmsford hadnt left with over half the invasion force and stayed at isandlwana would the outcome of the battle have been any different
Zulu's account of Isandlwana.
|Permissions in this forum:||You cannot reply to topics in this forum|