Latest topics | » In search of the 80th FootYesterday at 6:39 pm by Julian Whybra » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Yesterday at 4:43 pm by Dash » THE DISTINGUISHED CONDUCT MEDALThu Sep 05, 2024 11:16 pm by Julian Whybra » 61451 John Evans. Able Seaman.Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:15 pm by Matthew Turl » 9312 Sapper H Cuthbert 5th Field Coy REWed Sep 04, 2024 11:53 am by Julian Whybra » Who’s who in this photo?Tue Sep 03, 2024 12:44 pm by ianwood » Sir Robert William Jackson Mon Sep 02, 2024 10:24 am by Julian Whybra » Memorial to WolseleySun Sep 01, 2024 8:47 pm by John Young » Lieutenant & Adjutant Spencer Frederick Chichester, 2nd 21stSun Sep 01, 2024 7:52 pm by Rory Reynolds » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaSun Sep 01, 2024 7:51 am by Julian Whybra » On this day 28th August, 1879Sun Sep 01, 2024 7:28 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Ducat - N.N.C. Help with plotting his careerThu Aug 29, 2024 6:58 pm by Rory Reynolds » Army Pay Department PersonnelSun Aug 25, 2024 11:51 pm by Julian Whybra » Baron Von SteitencronSun Aug 25, 2024 10:32 am by Julian Whybra » Troop Despatch Sat Aug 24, 2024 10:15 pm by Eddie » Private 35/1430 James Priddle 1/13th RegimentSat Aug 24, 2024 8:09 am by Roobie257 » Zulu powder hornFri Aug 23, 2024 5:22 pm by Rob D » Telescope v. field glassesFri Aug 23, 2024 7:07 am by Julian Whybra » A Hungarian soldier in the Zulu War (?)Wed Aug 21, 2024 5:14 am by 90th » 90th foot sgt T. Collins 214Tue Aug 20, 2024 3:04 pm by johnman » Zulu "Corps"Tue Aug 20, 2024 11:43 am by Hobbes » amaKwenke amabuthoTue Aug 20, 2024 11:23 am by Hobbes » A story regarding Younghusband's charge. Hearsay or a possibility? Sun Aug 18, 2024 5:48 pm by Danny1960 » Hill of the Sphinx for sale open to offersSat Aug 17, 2024 6:44 pm by ciroferrara » Information help please Fri Aug 16, 2024 4:44 pm by Roobie257 » Capt. Geo. ShepstoneTue Aug 13, 2024 4:14 pm by Julian Whybra » Thomas William george 58th regiment 1880’s SATue Aug 13, 2024 12:05 pm by Alstar » Private John Scott 24th Regiment a fugitive at largeSun Aug 11, 2024 7:50 pm by Julian Whybra » Sergt. Woods N.N.C.Fri Aug 09, 2024 4:41 pm by Julian Whybra » Who led the Naval Brigade at Gingindlovu ?Thu Aug 08, 2024 9:32 pm by Herbert West » Herbert's Zulu war modelsThu Aug 08, 2024 7:06 pm by Herbert West » Studies in the Zulu War volumesWed Aug 07, 2024 2:31 pm by Julian Whybra » 80th Foot Information RequestTue Aug 06, 2024 6:28 pm by Bill8183 » Henderson and the NNH at Rorke's Drift Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:53 pm by SRB1965 » Hamilton Browne's birthdayMon Aug 05, 2024 2:41 pm by Julian Whybra |
September 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | | | | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | One in Ten had a Rifle. | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
Dave
Posts : 1603 Join date : 2009-09-21
| Subject: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:20 am | |
| I was Just flicking through the pages of "Narrative of the Field Operations connected with the Zulu War of 1879" On pages 23-24 there is reference to the Battle of "Inyezane" and in the area of Majia's Hill. The NNC were send up this hill to dislodge some Zulu's that had been seen. As they were getting near top a large body of Zulu's appeared on the hill some 400 yards on the left flank opening fire on the NNC troops who could not make an effective reply, as one in ten of the company,beside the european non-commissioned officers, carried rifles; the NNC to avoid being cut off made a hasty retreat.
Now I'm probably in- correct here, but I'm sure somewhere on the forum it was established that all members of the NNC were armed with rifles. It this is not the case, is it really fair to call members of the Native Troops cowards not just relating to this Battle but in all the Battles they took part in along side the British. Is it fair to expect them to stand their ground alongside soldiers who had better means to protect themselves and who could kill the enemy from a distance. |
| | | Mr Greaves
Posts : 747 Join date : 2009-10-18
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:10 am | |
| I would have thought, the NNC and other native units would have been far happier using the weapons they were accustomed too which would have been the same as the Zulu’s they were fighting. They probably fled because of the overwhelming number just as the British and other colonial units had.
Mr G. |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10904 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: One in ten had a rifle Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:28 pm | |
| Hi Dave. I'm assuming your thread is titled '' One in ten had a rifle '' . I can tell you that the NNC ( Natal Native Contingent ) did indeed have only one rifle between 10 and if I remember correctly the native who had the rifle was only given 5 rounds !!. Which no doubt was squeezed off as quickly as possible !!. We have never established that all the members of the NNC were issued a rifle . We have indeed established what you have written , ie ; One rifle per 10 NNC . This is mentioned in many books on the AZW. Hope this helps. cheers 90th. |
| | | 24th
Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:08 pm | |
| There was a brief disussion here. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Durnford’s Natal Native Horse had the Westley Richards carbine rifle, |
| | | Neil Aspinshaw
Posts : 553 Join date : 2009-10-14 Location : Loughborough
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:31 pm | |
| 24th Actually a mix, of Terry carbines, .50" Westley Richards Monkey tails,.450" but predominant Snider in .577". Bullet head evidence from the battlefields does back up this mix. It is often stated that Durnford armed his men with Swinburns chambering conventional Mk3 Martini Ammo, unlikely, as it was the S-H was cost prohibitive at the time. What snippet from Isandwana that do survive is that Durnford was clearing the jammed cartridges with a flick of his good hand, it can only be a bash of the front of an open Snider block to clear the breech.
Believe me, a jammed Martini takes more than a "flick".
|
| | | 24th
Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 8:20 pm | |
| Thanks Neil. Was all the mounted native units armed with rifles. I guess an assegai and shield on horse back would have been as much good as an ash tray on a motorbike. |
| | | Mr Greaves
Posts : 747 Join date : 2009-10-18
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 10:57 pm | |
| I also expect there would have been some uncertainty with regards that if they had been trained how to use the rifles and had all be issued with them, would they have stayed with the British or moved back over to the Zulu side. Too much information could have been dangerous. Just a thought. |
| | | 24th
Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Wed Jul 27, 2011 11:42 pm | |
| I do believe there were accounts of the NNC at Isandlwana removing their red bandannas in the hope of being mistaken for Zulu’s by the Zulu’s if you know what I mean. |
| | | Drummer Boy 14
Posts : 2008 Join date : 2011-08-01 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: One in Ten had a Rifle. Mon Sep 05, 2011 8:23 pm | |
| The Imperial Mounted Infantry – a scratch cavalry force raised from volunteers from infantry battalions who could ride – were not ‘armed with unwieldy Martini-Henry rifles’ (p. 68) but with Swinburne-Henry carbines.
From Iann Knights reveiw of The heroism and tragady of the Zulu war 1879 |
| | | | One in Ten had a Rifle. | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |