» Hassard Fairfax Charles.
Yesterday at 12:10 pm by rai
» Captain/ Sub Assistant Commissary Joseph Stead Army Commissariat Department
Yesterday at 11:49 am by rai
» Captain Archibald Graham Wavell 9th Regiment
Yesterday at 9:42 am by rai
» Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry Dinner, pre-October 1927
Yesterday at 9:00 am by Julian Whybra
» Replica Medals
Yesterday at 8:54 am by Julian Whybra
» Private 50B/371 Henry Ushen / Usher 57th Regiment
Yesterday at 8:43 am by rai
» Surruier Captain RE?
Yesterday at 2:08 am by Eddie
» Alfred Saxty
Yesterday at 1:25 am by 90th
» Private 3235 W J Blackmore 3/60th Regiment
Fri Mar 31, 2023 11:20 am by rai
» Commander Edward Duffett Naval Brigade
Thu Mar 30, 2023 11:42 am by rai
» Lance Corporal 13747 John Watson 30th Company Royal Engineers
Thu Mar 30, 2023 10:46 am by rai
» Sapper 13977 Henry Joseph Higgs 5th Company Royal Engineers
Wed Mar 29, 2023 11:21 am by rai
» Bugler 116 Sam Styles 90th Regiment
Wed Mar 29, 2023 10:33 am by rai
» Private 2074 William Barker, 1st King's Dragoon Guards
Tue Mar 28, 2023 11:59 am by rai
» Private 1246 Ernest? Mitchell 2/4th Regiment
Tue Mar 28, 2023 11:32 am by rai
» Corporal 25B/1139 Jonathan Smart 2/24th
Tue Mar 28, 2023 10:23 am by rai
» Private 1734 Edwin Charles Clarke 57th Regiment
Tue Mar 28, 2023 9:51 am by rai
» Private 65B/2370 Henry Francis Jarvis 94th Regiment Bronkhorst Spruit survivor
Tue Mar 28, 2023 9:30 am by rai
» Private 45/517 Francis Kerslake / Kersdake 2/3rd Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 12:10 pm by rai
» Private 11/2903 George Henry Squibb 2/4th Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 11:44 am by rai
» Sapper 13520 Charles Benford 30th Company Royal Engineers
Mon Mar 27, 2023 10:30 am by rai
» Corporal 45/1026 John Henry Jacobs 2/3rd Regiment
Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:53 am by rai
» Corporal Albert Smart Natal Mounted Police
Mon Mar 27, 2023 9:44 am by rai
» James Cumberland
Mon Mar 27, 2023 7:41 am by rai
» Captain H M Saunders 58th Regiment
Sun Mar 26, 2023 12:22 pm by John Young
» Private 115 Richard Suggett / Suggell 2/21st Regiment
Sun Mar 26, 2023 10:35 am by rai
» Private 2137 Thomas Edwards 17th Lancers , Valentine Baker, Corporal 1558 Thomas Bailey 17th Lancers
Sun Mar 26, 2023 10:28 am by rai
» Thomas Edwards
Sun Mar 26, 2023 9:43 am by rai
» Captain Alfred Godwin Godwin-Austen, 24th (2nd Warwickshire) Regiment of Foot
Sun Mar 26, 2023 9:03 am by rai
» Major-General CHERRY-GARRARD,
Sat Mar 25, 2023 11:18 am by ADMIN
» Sergeant 2195 Walter C Low / Lott 17th Lancers
Sat Mar 25, 2023 10:40 am by rai
» Private 1934 J Brewer and Private 1919 J Bathe 99th Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:39 am by rai
» Private 1118 William Laws, 90th Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:22 am by rai
» Time keeping at isandlwana
Sat Mar 25, 2023 9:20 am by Frank Allewell
» Lieutenant R T H Law 77th (East Middlesex) Regiment
Sat Mar 25, 2023 8:25 am by rai
|Top posting users this month|
|Fair Use Notice|
|Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
Saul David 1879
Posts : 1095
Join date : 2009-01-14
Location : East London
|Subject: Chelmsford’s replacement Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:54 pm|| |
Chelmsford was going to be relieved of his command, by Sir Garnet Wolseley for the defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana, and because an invasion of Natal seemed likely as a result. However Chelmsford defeated the Zulus at the Battle of Ulundi just before the arrival of his replacement, which effectively ended the Zulu campaign.
Was Chelmsford disobeying direct orders? If he was going to be relieved of his command should he not have waited in Natal until Wolseley arrived?
Or was he trying to make things right in the eyes of the public back in England before he came home. Chelmsford receive all the credit for Ulundi, and he was awarded the GCB
|Saul David 1879|
Posts : 527
Join date : 2009-02-28
|Subject: Re: Chelmsford’s replacement Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:10 am|| |
Lord Chelmsford did disobey orders, he received a confidential message from Sir Garnet Wolseley, and the message ordered Chelmsford not to engage in any serious actions until he arrived.
Lord Chelmsford’s was about 24 miles from the Royal Kraal at Ulundi. Sir Garnet Wolseley arrived in Cape Town on 28 June. Lord Chelmsford, had no intention of letting Sir Garnet Wolseley acquire the honour of his labours, and did not reply to the telegram.
Sir Garnet Wolseley send a second message on the 30 June which read:
"Concentrate your force immediately and keep it concentrated. Undertake no serious operations with detached bodies of troops. Acknowledge receipt of this message at once and flash back your latest moves. I am astonished at not hearing from you."
Sir Garnet Wolseley, keen to snatch triumph from Chelmsford, intended to sail to Port Durnford and link up with the 1st Division along the coast. From there he hoped he could move the Division forward and get to Ulundi in time to lead the attack.
A last message was dispatched to Lord Chelmsford explaining that Wolseley would be joining 1st Division and that Lord Chelmsford should withdraw if he was compelled to. However rough seas meant that Sir Garnet Wolseley had to travel much of the way by road. As Wolseley was riding north from Durban, Lord Chelmsford was preparing to engage the enemy - Wolseley's frantic efforts to reach the front were unsuccessful.
Posts : 7076
Join date : 2009-04-24
Age : 54
Location : Down South.
|Subject: Re: Chelmsford’s replacement Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:38 am|| |
It appears Chelmsford was quite good a disobeying orders, even his own, taking into account the fortification of Isandlwana, It seems he was just a glory hunter.
Posts : 2594
Join date : 2009-04-24
|Subject: Re: Chelmsford’s replacement Sun Jun 14, 2009 12:57 pm|| |
You have to take into account; That Chelmsford was under pressure by the British Government, they were looking for a scapegoat for the Isandlwana disaster, by this time Sir Bartle Frere had taken a back seat and, if Chelmsford had came home without putting things right so to say, his military career would have been demolished my the news papers of that day.
There was no way he was going to let someone else take the glory of the last battle that ended the campaign.
Posts : 10737
Join date : 2009-04-07
Age : 66
Location : Melbourne, Australia
|Subject: chelmfords final battle Sun Jun 14, 2009 3:08 pm|| |
im with ctsg on this one , you cant blame frederick for trying to right his wrongs , i think we all would have done the same thing , i know i would have !!.
Posts : 2558
Join date : 2009-04-06
Age : 60
Location : UK
|Subject: Re: Chelmsford’s replacement Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:24 pm|| |
Look what happened to Sir Bartle Frere. He died a broken man. I heard his memorial stone in St Paul’s was paid for by public donations.
|Saul David 1879|
Posts : 527
Join date : 2009-02-28
|Subject: Re: Chelmsford’s replacement Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:35 pm|| |
John good point. And you are correct with refrence to the memorial stone. Trouble was he was in to deep remember the heading above.
Lord Chelmsford invaded Zululand without the knowledge of the British Government in the hope that he could Capture Cetshwayo, the Zulu King, before London discovered that hostilities had begun.
|Permissions in this forum:||You cannot reply to topics in this forum|