Latest topics | » The Pictorial World - March 15th 1879Yesterday at 1:13 pm by ben2000 » The lost diary of Pvt James OwenThu Jul 25, 2024 12:03 pm by miklew » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaWed Jul 24, 2024 6:16 pm by John Young » What was the uniform of field marshals/generals in the zulu war?Mon Jul 22, 2024 6:53 am by John Young » Henderson and the NNH at Rorke's Drift Sat Jul 20, 2024 12:17 pm by SRB1965 » Capt. D. Hayes 1/3rd Regt., NNCThu Jul 18, 2024 11:11 am by Julian Whybra » The Wrecked CampWed Jul 17, 2024 4:33 pm by Julian Whybra » Private N/N John Robert Branch 90th Regiment and his discovered diaryMon Jul 15, 2024 8:53 pm by 1879graves » Private John Scott 24th Regiment a fugitive at largeSun Jul 14, 2024 12:06 pm by 1879graves » 90th foot sgt T. Collins 214Sun Jul 14, 2024 10:57 am by johnman » Baron Von SteitencronWed Jul 10, 2024 3:10 pm by Julian Whybra » Sgt Joseph Windridge, Defender of Rorke's Drift - MemorialTue Jul 09, 2024 3:15 am by 90th » Writing adviceSun Jul 07, 2024 4:04 pm by Julian Whybra » South Africa 1877-79, 1 clasp, 1877-8-9 (4389 Fr. Sergt. S. Smith. O/2. Bde. R.A.)Sun Jul 07, 2024 9:30 am by rai » The trashing of the Zulu monument to the brave warriors at Isandlawana March 12, 2024 has been blamed on scrap metal scavengers.Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:41 pm by ADMIN» The Goodwill Zulu Festival: Celebrating the Welsh and KwaZulu Natal Shared Heritage.Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:27 pm by ADMIN» Any nominal role of G Coy 2/24th regiment Thu Jul 04, 2024 11:18 am by Wayne » Bassage DiaryThu Jul 04, 2024 9:31 am by Julian Whybra » Prior to Sihayo's Kraal Thu Jul 04, 2024 9:19 am by 90th » British Fort LocationsThu Jul 04, 2024 3:40 am by 90th » Sergeant 1064 Tom Hick / Hicks G Company 2/24th RegimentWed Jul 03, 2024 11:05 am by Julian Whybra » A Hungarian soldier in the Zulu War (?)Fri Jun 28, 2024 2:31 pm by Mr M. Cooper » Private 25B/279 Henry Sears Bugler E Company 24th Reg. KIA IsandlwanaThu Jun 27, 2024 1:07 pm by gardner1879 » Hamilton Browne's birthdayFri Jun 21, 2024 9:22 am by Julian Whybra » Zulu "Corps"Thu Jun 20, 2024 6:01 pm by Hobbes » Army Pay Department PersonnelThu Jun 20, 2024 11:49 am by Julian Whybra » Ntshingwayo birth dateSun Jun 16, 2024 11:37 am by Hobbes » Zibhebhu and Cetshwayo's familyWed Jun 05, 2024 9:11 pm by Julian Whybra » Smith's Store/HotelWed Jun 05, 2024 6:06 pm by Julian Whybra » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Tue Jun 04, 2024 5:20 pm by Julian Whybra » Shaka iLembeSat Jun 01, 2024 1:27 pm by Jon84 » Bugler 1415 Thomas Finn / Flin 90th Regiment Sat May 25, 2024 11:28 am by johnman » Inspector-General Evelyn Richard Hugh PollardTue May 14, 2024 10:13 am by ADMIN» Alfred Fairlie Henderson photographs.Sat May 11, 2024 8:01 am by Julian Whybra » Fairlie's Native PoliceThu May 02, 2024 9:12 pm by Hobbes |
July 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | | | | | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
New topics | » The Pictorial World - March 15th 1879Yesterday at 1:13 pm by ben2000 » The lost diary of Pvt James OwenThu Jul 25, 2024 12:03 pm by miklew » Last of the 24th at IsandhlwanaWed Jul 24, 2024 5:53 pm by miklew » What was the uniform of field marshals/generals in the zulu war?Sun Jul 21, 2024 12:30 pm by darthvaix » Henderson and the NNH at Rorke's Drift Fri Jul 19, 2024 1:29 pm by SRB1965 » Capt. D. Hayes 1/3rd Regt., NNCWed Jul 17, 2024 10:52 pm by Julian Whybra » The Wrecked CampSun Jul 14, 2024 8:51 am by 61MECH » The trashing of the Zulu monument to the brave warriors at Isandlawana March 12, 2024 has been blamed on scrap metal scavengers.Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:41 pm by ADMIN» The Goodwill Zulu Festival: Celebrating the Welsh and KwaZulu Natal Shared Heritage.Thu Jul 04, 2024 7:27 pm by ADMIN |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | Killed/wounded ratio? | |
|
+4John Chelmsfordthescapegoat tasker224 Mikran 8 posters | Author | Message |
---|
Mikran
Posts : 10 Join date : 2012-08-07 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 11:20 am | |
| A while ago I discussed the comparatively low casualy figures of the Zulus, and I also touched upon the killed/wounded ratio. Now I'm wondering if there is any evidence of how many Zulus were wounded in each battle, and throughout the war? When looking at casualty figures from other historical battles, as well as AZW British casualties that should be held as well-documented, it is strikingly clear how many were wounded compared to the number killed. For instance, at Kambula the British had almost twice as many wounded as killed (including the mortally wounded), at Ulundi the ratio was 1:5 and at Gingindhlovu 1:6. If we compare that with other battles of the era like Sedan (1870), there was a killed/wounded ratio of 1:3 for the Prussians and almost 1:5 for the French. At Gettysburg the ratio for the Union army was 1:5 and 1:3 for the Confederates (presumably more wounded Confederates died due to lack of proper field hospitals).
If we take these statistics into account, could it be that total Zulu casualties were bigger than previously thought? When the British counted dead Zulus on the battlefields, did they include those wounded who were dispatched on site? Were dead Zulus carried off the battlefield by their comrades during retreats? Could it be assumed that the Zulu killed/wounded casualty rate might have been somewhere in the area of at least 1:2 or 1:3? |
| | | tasker224
Posts : 2101 Join date : 2010-07-30 Age : 57 Location : North London
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 5:44 pm | |
| Mikran, the killed/wounded ratio from any skirmish, fight, battle etc depends on many, many, factors. In the AZW, the only way to know for sure is if records were kept, but the Zulus did not keep records. At the Somme in 1916 on the first day, the Germans inflicted a killed:wounded ratio of 1:2 on the British and Allied troops and they were going at slow moving targets in open ground with heavy artillery and machine guns from a relatively close range. Therefore, I do not think it is safe to assume that the Zulus suffered anywhere near a similar ratio in the battles of the AZW. |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 8:49 pm | |
| Mikran, Heres some information from Col: Mike Snook. Zulu War Author / Historian.
"A number of points to ponder:
The Zulus were magnificent and athletic light infantrymen well versed in the use of ground, cover and 'skirmishing' style tactics - they were not the suicidal lemmings so ridiculously portrayed at the end of Zulu where the whole Zulu nation appears to get wiped out in about two and a half minutes.
RD was substantially a night battle - the only light after 7.30 pm was that which came from the burning hospital [thatch]. Difficult to shoot anything in those conditions. Couple this with dreadful muzzle flash from the MH rifle which ruins the firer's night vision with every shot (and I don't just mean one's own shots). After the first couple of hours the rifles were too hot and people's shoulders too bruised to take a proper aim with all due regard to the principles of marksmanship.
In front of the north wall there was a great deal of cover - not least a five foot high stone wall - which ran pretty much the length of the defences and served as a ready made dead ground FUP [military jargon - forming up point]. Additonally there was a good deal of dead ground at either end of the north wall - beneath the rocky ledge beyond the hospital, at one end, and same effect down beyond the cattle kraal at the other. Beyond the cattle kraal, outside the perimeter, there was a second, much larger, stone-walled stock pen - again perfect cover for many hundreds of men. Key, then, is the fact that the Zulus were not making the long exposed approaches that one sees in Zulu. They got in close, early, and then they stayed there - most of them would have spent the battle on their bellies, crawling about behind walls and ditches, squatting on their haunches, waiting the order for their particular 'company' to try a rush on the defences
Attacks were short lived and furious - they bubbled out of cover at short range. In between times there was a great deal of musket and rifle fire being poured into the post - not only from Shiyane - but from the close cover as well. Another myth is that most of the Brit casualties were shot from Shiyane - in fact the majority occurred from fire being poured in at close range. There was a lot of snap-shooting going on at fleetingly exposed targets. Such targets are extremely difficult to hit, if the firer is jinking about too.
The Zulus were kept out of RD, in the main, by the voulme of British fire. And the bayonet only when it came to it...
You can fire an awful lot of rounds without hitting anything under the conditions I have described."
|
| | | John
Posts : 2558 Join date : 2009-04-06 Age : 61 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 8:57 pm | |
| Some good points there.. Perhaps we look to the film to much for answers... |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 9:00 pm | |
| Agree John, we forget most of the fighting was done in darkness. I know the burning hospital provided some light, but in most cases you can't shoot what you can't see!!! |
| | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-02 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 9:39 pm | |
| I think Mike makes a lot of sense!! Never thought of it that way. It would have been only natural, that the Zulu's spent most of thier time on their bellies, avoiding the shots. I'm still surprised that the rifles lasted as long at the ammo? |
| | | Ulundi
Posts : 558 Join date : 2012-05-05
| | | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-02 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Wed May 15, 2013 11:07 pm | |
| Ulundi. After prolonged use the weapon system would get fouled to the point that it was almost impossible to reload. This problem was caused by the thin rolled brass cartridge and the black powder propellant. However only one defender makes reference to this " Pte Henry Hook" That's why I said - Quote :
- I'm still surprised that the rifles lasted as long at the ammo
|
| | | 90th
Posts : 10890 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 68 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: Killed / Wounded ratio Thu May 16, 2013 6:38 am | |
| John I wouldnt look to the film to answer any questions ! :p;: , or Zulu Dawn for that matter , I'm sure some are guilty of doing so on both films . 90th |
| | | Mikran
Posts : 10 Join date : 2012-08-07 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Thu May 16, 2013 10:10 am | |
| Interesting discussion about Rorke's Drift, fighting darkness etc, but I can't really see what the last posts have to do with the topic? |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Thu May 16, 2013 11:48 am | |
| Mikran I think what CTSG is saying (from Mike Snook) is that the defenders laid down a massive amount of blanket fire during the night time. They could not see into the darkness so literally volley fired into the night at any sound. Considering the amount of cover the impi had hundreds of rounds would have impacted into the stone walls, cook house etc. Therefore the kill ratio would have been minimal. There really is no way of knowing what the wounded situation would have been. Suffice to say that Bertram Mitford mentions that on his tour there where many instances of bullet wounds. Harry Lugg also relates a story of meeting a wounded zulu after the war and exchanging stories.
Regards |
| | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-02 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: Killed/wounded ratio? Thu May 16, 2013 3:39 pm | |
| There was 400 odd, wounded Zulus killed in the melee fields, after the Battle. Possibly victims of ramdom shots |
| | | | Killed/wounded ratio? | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |