Latest topics | » Colonialism: A Moral LegacyYesterday at 7:25 pm by Julian Whybra » Punch's view of Chelmsford's tactics!Yesterday at 1:37 pm by lydenburg » Writing adviceTue Mar 26, 2024 4:26 pm by Julian Whybra » Private John Scott 24th Regiment a fugitive at largeWed Mar 20, 2024 2:53 pm by Dash » Sergeant W E Warren RA - VeteranTue Mar 19, 2024 11:32 pm by Matthew Turl » Your favourite line from Zulu or Zulu DawnTue Mar 19, 2024 6:52 pm by Julian Whybra » 100,000 posts!Tue Mar 19, 2024 4:20 pm by Julian Whybra » Zulu Dawn/Zulu - New Immortals Film The Way Forward ?Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:34 pm by jgregory » Badge on 2/60th and 3/60th foreign service helmets Sat Mar 16, 2024 1:05 pm by John Young » Corporal James Frowen Williams F Company. Fri Mar 15, 2024 11:08 am by Julian Whybra » British rations and moraleTue Mar 12, 2024 1:05 am by Julian Whybra » Blue Plaque to James Egan, alias Private HaganMon Mar 11, 2024 11:16 pm by ADMIN» A few questions regarding Rorke's Drift and IsandlwanaWed Mar 06, 2024 11:16 pm by Julian Whybra » William J Hoare 24th Regiment??Sun Mar 03, 2024 9:08 pm by Dash » Swinburn Carbine issue in AZWThu Feb 29, 2024 2:53 pm by Rob D » Australians who went to Zululand and fought in the 1879 war.Thu Feb 29, 2024 10:39 am by John Young » Philip Price Thu Feb 29, 2024 9:55 am by Julian Whybra » Alfred Fairlie Henderson Thu Feb 29, 2024 9:47 am by RoryReynolds » August Hammar Letter Dated 6th Jan 1879Thu Feb 22, 2024 10:34 pm by Stefaan » Bearing The Cross by Ken Blakeson | BBC RADIO DRAMA: Ken Blakeson's play tells the story of the Battle of Rorke's Drift and the effect it had on three of the soldiers who fought in it.Wed Feb 21, 2024 12:57 pm by Julian Whybra » Letter of officer during Zulu wars.Wed Feb 21, 2024 12:47 pm by Julian Whybra » About the second invasionTue Feb 20, 2024 11:14 pm by 90th » Zulu Festival Brecon July 2024Sat Feb 17, 2024 9:35 pm by John Young » Watford band boys killed at iSandlwanaFri Feb 16, 2024 10:26 am by Julian Whybra » Private J. McCrudden 1/13 Foot Sun Feb 11, 2024 5:10 am by 90th » Death of Michael Jayson (Zulu Dawn)Thu Feb 08, 2024 11:55 pm by ADMIN» The anniversary of 22nd January in 2024Thu Feb 08, 2024 5:51 pm by luke1997 » What was the distance?Thu Feb 08, 2024 10:46 am by Stefaan » Mrs Henry HookTue Feb 06, 2024 5:14 pm by Kenny » "With 6 good riflemen"Mon Feb 05, 2024 4:30 pm by Mr M. Cooper » What was G company supposed to do?Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:31 pm by Julian Whybra » Private 1445 Charles Meates 17th Lancers and his brother William WylieSat Feb 03, 2024 12:07 am by John Young » South Africa Medal With Clasp To Pvt J. Salter 3/60thFri Feb 02, 2024 5:12 pm by Foody » Weatherleys Border Horse FlagThu Feb 01, 2024 11:40 pm by Herbie » Edward Plantagenet Kemeys-TynteWed Jan 24, 2024 12:06 am by Edjg |
March 2024 | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
| | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | Calendar |
|
Top posting users this month | |
Zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. |
Due to recent events on this forum, we have now imposed a zero tolerance to harassment and bullying. All reports will be treated seriously, and will lead to a permanent ban of both membership and IP address.
Any member blatantly corresponding in a deliberate and provoking manner will be removed from the forum as quickly as possible after the event.
If any members are being harassed behind the scenes PM facility by any member/s here at 1879zuluwar.com please do not hesitate to forward the offending text.
We are all here to communicate and enjoy the various discussions and information on the Anglo Zulu War of 1879. Opinions will vary, you will agree and disagree with one another, we will have debates, and so it goes.
There is no excuse for harassment or bullying of anyone by another person on this site.
The above applies to the main frame areas of the forum.
The ring which is the last section on the forum, is available to those members who wish to partake in slagging matches. That section cannot be viewed by guests and only viewed by members that wish to do so. |
Fair Use Notice | Fair use notice.
This website may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorised by the copyright owner.
We are making such material and images are available in our efforts to advance the understanding of the “Anglo Zulu War of 1879. For educational & recreational purposes.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material, as provided for in UK copyright law. The information is purely for educational and research purposes only. No profit is made from any part of this website.
If you hold the copyright on any material on the site, or material refers to you, and you would like it to be removed, please let us know and we will work with you to reach a resolution. |
| | At what Point Was The Battle Lost? | |
|
+4Frank Allewell 90th Chelmsfordthescapegoat impi 8 posters | Author | Message |
---|
impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-03 Age : 44
| Subject: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:21 am | |
| Hi. I'm just trying to work out at what point the battle was lost. Was it at the point when Durnford retreated to the donga causing the firing line to become over extended, or when the Native Contingent broke and fled? Or was it a combination of both? |
| | | Chelmsfordthescapegoat
Posts : 2593 Join date : 2009-04-24
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:59 am | |
| Hi impi. Good to see you still posting. The Native Contingent, were positioned with the artillery to the far left two cannons firing towards the east. On the right of the guns there was a line of Bristish soldiers placed in extended order, which consisted of two companies of the 1/24th Regiment and one company of the 2/24th under the command of Lieutenant Pope with a large-opening between each regiment. Further to the right, and fair distance away, was Colonel Durnford with his men, who were making their last stand. The Zulus were advancing in thousands, the chest moving from the north-east, countless numbers of Zulu’s were cut down. But the British front line had to fall back. The Native Contingent were left in an advanced and secluded position by 1 pm even with their gallant defence, the Zulus had come up to within 300 yards. Ammunition was low and their firing no longer having any effect. The Zulus moved forward; forcing the Native Contingent to break and run. At this point the Zulu’s at the run poured all the way through the gap. The beginning of the fearsome slaughter. The Zulu's avanced so fast that Cavaye and Mostyn had no time to reorganization or even to give the order to fix bayonets, the Zulu’s were among them. Younghusband for a short time retreated to a terrace on the southern incline of the mountain, but it was all to soon before they joined their comrades. Hope this helps. (Good Night) |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10881 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 67 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: at what point was the battle lost. Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:39 am | |
| hi Impi. Call me a pesimist but the battle was lost once the Good Lord left the camp . Pulleine set out his forces as per instructions set down in The Good Lord's standing orders for the invasion of zululand which he gave to all the column commanders dated Dec 1878 from memory . Clearly these instructions were inadequate to say the least. There is no mention of the British Square as it was considered old hat by this stage . No mention of Laager's , entrenchments etc etc . The exact date of these instuctions is 23 /12 / 78 , almost a month to the day , we have 1500 dead British and other forces lying on the blood stained ground of Isandlwana . I will post a link and please someone purchase this , as it is very important to read and post so OTHERS on this forum can see for themselves how the disaster was inevitable . I have no idea how to post this stuff [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]Take note of the opening article , also other articles which have had airing on the forum recently , ie - Addendorf . These journals are well worth the money , many fascinating subjects concerning the zulu war . I have no qualms about reccomending the series there are 16 editions available in this form , others are available on the net , but you need to be a member to access them as far as I'm aware . If someone does have this edition can they please post the Chelmsford Article . cheers 90th. |
| | | Frank Allewell
Posts : 8572 Join date : 2009-09-21 Age : 77 Location : Cape Town South Africa
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:19 pm | |
| Impi Have to agree with 90th. However on the day of the battle the key moment was the left horn outflanking the mounted detachment. They outflanked Charlie Pope, Durbford and the mounted detachment extended the line but the Zulu just kept extended their enveloping move across the plain. Eventually they had force of numbers to push and push untill the mounted detachment had to retire in doing so they exposed Popes right flank. He had to wheel his force to try and protect the lines rear. That opened up the entire front of the camp to the left flank. The extreme left was defended for a while by the Durnford /Pullen stand. Effectivly the battle was then over. There was no ammo shortage, the firing line wasnt to spread out. If it had been merely a frontal assault the firing line could have held all day. Those two horns of the buffalo did exactly what iShaka designed them for.
Regards |
| | | mons14
Posts : 101 Join date : 2009-10-28
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:28 pm | |
| A short excerpt from Mike Snook's book which I think plays well into this thread:
'...There was a very brief moment when the situation in front of the camp could have been saved. Had Durnford's command rallied enmass in the saddle, and ammunition had been brought up quickly, then the right might have been held, enabling the 24th to complete its withdrawl in good order, though G Company was doomed in any scenario. The fact is, though, that Durnford lost control, and most of his men fled the field. These early fugitives behaved reprehensibly, for the issue was not yet settled beyond a doubt. From the very instant that Durnford's men failed to rally, however defeat became inevitable.'
mons |
| | | ADMIN
Posts : 4349 Join date : 2008-11-01 Age : 64 Location : KENT
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:02 pm | |
| Hi Mons14. Its this based on fact. Or what may have happen. - Quote :
- " Durnford lost control, and most of his men fled the field"
|
| | | mons14
Posts : 101 Join date : 2009-10-28
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:36 pm | |
| The author, like all Isandlwana authors/historians develop conclusions based on surviving facts and logical speculation. Sadly the whole battle of Isandlwana is largely left to speculation.
So yes, strickly speaking this is what might have happened. At the end of the day, what you choose to believe is your own choice. However the following passage is what I thought was most important to this thread,
From the very instant that Durnford's men failed to rally, however defeat became inevitable
This statement is in keeping with what most historians believe is true: The moment of Durnford's retreat, and the opening up of the right is the moment that battle left British control.
Here are some numbers that seem to help support the authors conclusions, now I know not all of these men were directly with Durnford - I think it was just the 1st. Bn. 1st. Regt. NNC, but the numbers of thoes survived is pretty large:
Natal Mounted Police Strength: 2 Officers and 34 men. Killed: 2 Officers and 25 men Survived: 0 Officers and 10 men
1st Bn. 1st Regt. NNC Strength: 5 Officers 318 men Killed: 2 Officers and 10 men Survived: 2 Officers 308 men
1st. Bn. 3rd Regt. NNC Stength: 11 Officers 231 men Killed: 8 Officers and 28 men Survived: 2 Officers 208 men
2nd Bn. 3rd Regt. NNC Strength: 9 Officers and 328 men Killed: 9 Officers and 28 men Survived: 0 Officers and 300 men
Natal Native Mounted Contingent Stength: 6 Officers and 257 men Killed: 1 Officer 27 men Survived: 5 Officers and 200 men
On a side note - wouldnt it have been fantastic if all thoes survivors would have been interviewed after the fact....How much more would we know to today???
mons |
| | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-03 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:08 pm | |
| He didn't have much luck at Bushman's River Pass
Where he showed great courage but received two assegai stabs, one in his side, the other in his elbow; severing a nerve thus paralysing his left under-arm and hand for the rest of his life. Durnford managed to shoot two of his assailants with his revolver and to extricate himself. His Carbineers had abandoned him, but his loyal Basuto troopers stood by him. |
| | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-03 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:15 pm | |
| Chelmsford left around 1300 men at Isandlwana did this include Durnford and his troops that were brought up from R.D I maybe reading this wrong. - Quote :
- Natal Mounted Police
Strength: 2 Officers and 34 men. Killed: 2 Officers and 25 men Survived: 0 Officers and 10 men
1st Bn. 1st Regt. NNC Strength: 5 Officers 318 men Killed: 2 Officers and 10 men Survived: 2 Officers 308 men
1st. Bn. 3rd Regt. NNC Stength: 11 Officers 231 men Killed: 8 Officers and 28 men Survived: 2 Officers 208 men
2nd Bn. 3rd Regt. NNC Strength: 9 Officers and 328 men Killed: 9 Officers and 28 men Survived: 0 Officers and 300 men
Natal Native Mounted Contingent Stength: 6 Officers and 257 men Killed: 1 Officer 27 men Survived: 5 Officers and 200 men Are these the men that were with Durnford at Isandlwana. If you keep seeing me coming and going. Her in-doors is up-stairs ironing. Thought she was coming down. |
| | | joe
Posts : 600 Join date : 2010-01-07 Location : UK
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:46 pm | |
| Impi, I think it was just the 1st Bn 1st Rgt that was with Durnford, as Mons14 said before, corect me if im wrong.
And I think it was just the British soldiers who were counted in the 1300, again im happy to be corrected
thanks joe |
| | | impi
Posts : 2308 Join date : 2010-07-03 Age : 44
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:21 am | |
| Thanks Joe. How many British Soldiers took part in the battle of Isandlwana. |
| | | 24th
Posts : 1862 Join date : 2009-03-25
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:53 am | |
| At what point was the Battle Lost !
It was when the last British Soldier was killed.
|
| | | mons14
Posts : 101 Join date : 2009-10-28
| Subject: Re: At what Point Was The Battle Lost? Thu Aug 05, 2010 2:21 am | |
| I've checked a couple books now, and can confirm that Durnford had the 1st Bn. 1st Regt. NNC with him during the battle. So of the 5 Officers 318 men of this unit, 2 Officers 308 men survived the battle. Provides us with very strong evidence that supports Mike Snooks very well grounded position that: " Durnford lost control, and most of his men fled the field"Below is the casualty numbers for Isandlwana - [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] |
| | | 90th
Posts : 10881 Join date : 2009-04-07 Age : 67 Location : Melbourne, Australia
| Subject: what point was the battle lost. Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:06 am | |
| hi Mons14 / impi. I have looked up the 1st Batt 1st Regt NNC in the John Young book ' They Fell Like Stones ' according to it From that Regt he had only 2 Coy's , D and E , about 240 men. cheers 90th.
|
| | | | At what Point Was The Battle Lost? | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |